Title: Fostering HigherOrder Mathematical Thinking Using Technology
1Fostering Higher-Order Mathematical Thinking
Using Technology
Lingguo Bu lb04f_at_fsu.edu Rob Schoen
rschoen_at_zeno.math.fsu.edu Faculty Advisor Dr.
Maria Fernandez Florida State University Februar
y 25, 2005
2What does research say?
- Harold Wenglinskys findings
- Eighth graders whose teachers used computers
mostly for simulations and applications--general
ly associated with higher-order
thinking--performed better on NAEP than students
whose teachers did not. Meanwhile, 8th graders
whose teachers used computers primarily for
drill and practice--generally associated with
lower-order thinking--performed worse. - (Education Week on the Web, retrieved January
7, 2005). - Refer also to the National Educational Technology
Plan.
3Learning Theory Bruners Three Modes of
Cognitive Representation
- Enactive (motor responses)
- Iconic (images)
- Symbolic (language, mathematical notations,
computational models)
Adults and kids alike learn best using
representations appropriate for their age and,
most importantly, their level of cognitive
development.
4Mathematical Values of Sierpinskis Triangle
- Geometrically, it provides opportunity for
learners to explore symmetry, similarity,
transformation, etc. - Algebraically, it is rich in patterns, relations,
and measurement. - Cognitively, it affords a connection between
geometry and algebra, generating
thought-provoking discourse in the classroom. - Computationally, it invites reflections and
fosters learner ownership.
5Multiple Approaches
- Lecture Lets talk about it.
- Hand-on Project Lets Cut.
- Paintbrush Lets draw on the computer.
- Computation Lets try programming.
6The Lecture Approach
- Instructor-centered presentation
- Little or no learner participation
- Little interaction between learners and the
instructor. - Result knowledge with little understanding or
chance for knowledge transfer. - Benefit time management and faster coverage of
the lesson text.
7Paper and Scissors
- We observed two types of construction building
and removing. - Benefits engages learners, provides hand-on
reference, generates discourse - Drawback instruction time and lower-order
understanding.
8The Paintbrush Approach
- Using the painting tool, we observed two types of
behavior representing two types of understanding. - Replication (Copy Paste)
- representing a partial view of the fractal as an
outgrowing self-similar figure. - Recursive Division
- representing a partial view of the fractal as an
evolving structure on a microscopic scale.
9Paintbrush Replication(copypaste)
10Paintbrush Recursive Division
11A Computational Approach
- To Draw a Sierpinski Triangle
- if it is the deepest level, draw a filled
triangle - otherwise
- Draw a sierpinski triangle in the lower-left.
- Draw a sierpinski triangle at the top
- Draw a sierpinski triangle in the lower-right.
12A Mathematica Implementation
13A Computational Approach
- Benefits
- Provides a scaffold for learners to explore the
various properties of the fractal toward an
in-depth understanding of the mathematics behind. - Helps develop an appreciation of mathematical
rules. - Generates a more detailed visualization of the
structure. - Enhance motivation for learners to take
initiative in their mathematical experience. - Drawbacks
- Software and hardware support.
- Experience in coding.
- Teachers knowledge of the integration of
mathematics and computing and related pedagogical
issues.
14Recommendations for Instruction
- Hands-on projects and computer-assisted
exploration provide the foundation for learning
cognitive development their roles in the
classroom are not to be overlooked as learning
aids. - Instruction might follow the sequence of
ethnomathematical knowledge, to intuitive, to
technical symbolic, and axiomatic deductive
knowledge (Kieren, T. E. 1993). - Technology, especially, the computer, could be
used at various levels of the instruction to
facilitate learners visualization and
exploration. In particular, computer simulation
and learner-initiated programming contributes to
higher-order mathematical thinking.
15Acknowledgement
- Work funded in part by Florida Department of
Education in its STTA Grant (Students
Transitioning Toward Algebra), directed Dr Maria
Fernandez and Dr. Monica Hurdal. - References
- Archer, J. (2005). The link to higher scores.
Education Week on the Web. - Bransford, John D., Ann L. Brown and Rodney
R. Cocking (ed). (1999). How People Learn
Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington,
D.C. National Academy Press. - Driscoll, M. P. (2000) . Psychology of learning
for instruction. (2nd ed.). Boston, MA Allyn
and Bacon. - Sowder, J. T. et al. (1998). Middle-grade
teachers mathematical knowledge and its
relationship to instruction. Albany, NY SUNY
Press.