The Changing Face of ILL: PatronInitiated Borrowing and Traditional Interlibrary Loan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

The Changing Face of ILL: PatronInitiated Borrowing and Traditional Interlibrary Loan

Description:

1. How many journal articles were requested by Alliance members from within and ... 3. How many libraries would have been able to supply each article? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Mark980
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Changing Face of ILL: PatronInitiated Borrowing and Traditional Interlibrary Loan


1
The Changing Face of ILLPatron-Initiated
BorrowingandTraditional Interlibrary Loan
  • Lynn Chmelir, Washington State University
  • lchmelir_at_wsu.edu
  • Nancy Nathanson, Orbis Cascade Alliance
  • nnathans_at_oregon.uoregon.edu
  • Sarah Beasley, Portland State University
  • beasleys_at_pdx.edu

2
Patron-InitiatedBorrowing
  • End user sends an electronic request directly to
    a lending library without staff mediation at the
    borrowing library.

3
Overview
  • Part One Books
  • Orbis
  • Cascade
  • Summit
  • Traditional Interlibrary Loan
  • Part Two Articles
  • Article Supplier Analysis Project
  • Innovative Interfaces Development Effort
  • Orbis Cascade Alliance Council Decision
  • Part Three
  • Efficiencies of patron-initiated borrowing

4
Orbis 1993-20025-20 Public and Private
Institutionsin Oregon and Washington
  • First replication of OhioLINK
  • Patron-initiated borrowing via an Innovative
    Interfaces Union Catalog
  • Institutional cooperation backed up by an
    excellent delivery service

5
Experience at Linfield College
  • Union catalog became the default catalog
  • Large initial net borrower
  • 97/98 1,438 loans 4 of consortium total
  • 4,908 borrows 13 of consortium
    total
  • 3,470 net borrows
  • Load leveling changed that
  • 98/99 8,028 loans 10.6 of consortium total
  • 6,385 borrows 8.4 of consortium total
  • 1,643 net loans
  • Traditional Interlibrary Loan for books
    diminished
  • sharply

6
Change in Net Lending97/98 to 98/99
7
Cascade 2000-20036 Washington Public
Institutions
  • Central Washington University
  • Eastern Washington University
  • The Evergreen State College
  • University of Washington
  • Washington State University
  • Western Washington University
  • Another Replication of IIIs OhioLINK software,
    now named INN-Reach
  • Cascade Borrowing and Traditional Interlibrary
    Loan
  • Chmelir, L. (2005), Patron-Initiated Borrowing
    and Traditional ILL the Cascade Experience.
    Interlending and Document Supply. Vol. 33 No. 1,
    pp. 35-41.

8
ILL and Cascade Book Loans 98/99-02/03Traditio
nal ILL down 21Book transactions up 272
9
Transactions for booksUp an average of 272
from 98/99 to 02/03
10
ILL and Cascade Book Loans71 via Cascade in
02/03
11
ILL Copies 99-03Remained virtually unchanged
12
Cascade Net Loans 2002/03
13
Summit 2003-Orbis Cascade Alliance26-33
Public and Private Institutionsin Oregon and
Washington
14
Transactions of Former Cascade Libraries via
Summit
15
Cascade LibrariesGrowth in Patron-Initiated
Transactions 00/01 75,330 04/05 190,975 5
year increase 153
16
Cascade Net Lending via Summit03/04 .92 Net
Borrower04/05 1.02 Net Lender
17
Economies of Patron Initiated BorrowingARL
Study in 2004
  • Higher fill rates
  • Faster turnaround time
  • Lower unit costs
  • Borrowing 2.89 versus 17.50 (17)
  • Lending 3.27 versus 9.27 (35)
  • Jackson, M. (2004). Assessing ILL/DD Services
    New Cost-effective Alternatives, with Kingma, B.
    and Delaney, T. Association of Research
    Libraries, Washington DC.

18
Patron-Initiated Article Requests?The CDMC
Article Supplier Analysis ProjectOrbis Cascade
Alliance
  • October 2004 Council established the Collection
    Development and Manangement Committee
  • January 2005 Council charged the CDMC to
    provide date to help it decide whether to enter
    into a development project with III to provide
    patron-initiated article delivery. They asked
    for information for a single month to answer the
    following questions
  • 1. How many journal articles were requested by
    Alliance members from within and outside the
    consortium?
  • 2. How many of them could have been filled
    from within the Alliance?
  • 3. How many libraries would have been able to
    supply each article?
  • 4. Is there potential for load balancing for
    article requests?
  • Deadline mid-April, 2005

19
Data Collection Effort
  • Developed a data collection form on Excel
  • CDMC members acted as liaisons at their libraries
  • Very short deadline
  • Summit holdings records were messy, inconsistent,
    and difficult to interpret
  • Everyone came through!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com