Constitutional Law October 7, 2004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Constitutional Law October 7, 2004

Description:

Article III Debate (finish) Judicial Power and SOP. Review Problems. Recap. Finished PQ ... Prescribed rule of decision (so what?) Infringes President's pardon power ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: rle
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Constitutional Law October 7, 2004


1
Constitutional LawOctober 7, 2004
  • Separation of Powers
  • Judicial Power
  • External Limits
  • Article III Debate (finish)
  • Judicial Power and SOP
  • Review Problems

2
Recap
  • Finished PQ
  • Scope of Textual Commitment (Powell)
  • Hamdi
  • Presidential Authority
  • Reviewability of Status
  • External Limits
  • Amendment
  • Appointment
  • Jurisdiction

3
ii. Klein
  • Forfeiture of property
  • Proof of noncollaboration
  • Evidentiary impact of pardon?
  • Ct. held proof of noncollaboration
  • Statute
  • proof of collaboration
  • ousted jurisdiction
  • Unconstitutional
  • Prescribed rule of decision (so what?)
  • Infringes Presidents pardon power

4
3. Judicial Power SOP
  • Limits of Jurisdiction Stripping
  • Other constitutional provisions
  • Interfere with essential functions
  • Other SOP issues
  • Administrative Adjudication
  • Broadly tolerated
  • Foreclosure of Review?
  • Impeachment, Elections, Reprisals
  • Extrajudicial Functions

5
Problem 1 Facts
  • BAD
  • Deny Recognition
  • Use of Force to Apprehend Terrorists
  • Islamias Refusal
  • Recognition
  • Agreement
  • WPR
  • Lawsuit by Opposition Groups

6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
Problem 2 Facts
  • SAFE
  • Creates NAB
  • Broad Powers
  • Profiling
  • Statutory Silence
  • No Official NAB Position
  • Civil Suit

16
Q.1. Executive Privilege
  • Essential Functions Balancing Test
  • Need For Production
  • Compare Nixon
  • Law suit, but civil plaintiff
  • Need for Secrecy
  • Undifferentiated claim?
  • In camera review

17
Q.2(a) ND Doctrine
  • Rationale and Policy
  • Intelligible Principle Test
  • ensure safety of public
  • airport security requirements
  • Historical Application/Comparison
  • Narrowing Construction

18
Q.2(b) Appointment
  • Art II Applies
  • Officer of US b/c of authority
  • By Atty General (Head of Dept)
  • Inferior officer?
  • Morrison Factors
  • Under AG
  • Broad Policy Authority
  • Broad Jurisdiction
  • Not Temporary

19
Q.2(c) Removal
  • For Cause Provision
  • Removal by AG (President Controls)
  • Not per se invalid
  • Functions
  • Predominantly pure Executive
  • Some Quasilegislative
  • Level of Officer
  • Probably Principal
  • Arguably Invalid
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com