Title: Getting Promoted in the Clinical Sciences at Duke
1Getting Promoted in the Clinical Sciences at Duke
- Ann Brown MD MHS
- Associate Vice Dean for Faculty Development
- 10/27/08
2Contact
- Office for Faculty Development
- Phone 684-4139
- Email brown066_at_mc.duke.edu
- Web facdev.medschool.duke.edu
3This presentation will cover
- Guidelines for promotion on each of the 5 tracks
- Examples of promotable achievements
- Choosing a track
- Switching tracks
- Tenure clocks
- Documenting your achievements
- Timeline for promotion review process
4Why have Pathways?
- Pathways designed to help faculty succeed within
the framework of institutional needs - Many ways to develop a career at Duke
- Create a consistent set of expectations
- Provide guidance to APT Committees
APT Appointment, Promotions Tenure.
5Guidelines Apply To
- Clinical Departments
- MDs
- PhDs
- MD/PhDs
- Other terminal degree holders in the clinical
departments - (Basic Science Departments have a different
process. See the following web links
medschool.duke.edugtfacultystaffgtSchool of
Medicine APTgtBasic Sciences-APT)
6What is Tenure?
- Tenure is a promise of continued employment,
absent malfeasance - A specific salary isnt promised
- For Clinicians who belong to the PDC
- Full professor 30K
- Associate professor 25K
- For faculty who do not belong to the PDC, tenure
may have a different meaning -
7What are the Pathways?
- There are five pathways (revised 2006)
- Standard Tenure Clock (10 years)
- 1 Clinical / Administrative / Educators
- 2 Clinician Researchers
- 3 Research focused faculty
- Non-clocked term appointments
- 4 Clinicians
- 5 Researchers
Basic Science Department tenure clock is 7 years
8What are the Ranks?
- Medical Instructor (incubator status, tenure
clock not active) - Assistant Professor
- Associate Professor
- Associate Professor with Tenure
- Professor
- Professor with Tenure
Tracks 4 and 5 only
9What are the Criteria?
- Varies with track
- The selection of a given track defines the
promotion expectations - Track 1 Clinical / Administrative / Educational
expectations - Track 2 Mixed Research Clinical
- Track 3 Research
- Track 4 Clinical
- Track 5 Research
10What are the Criteria?
- Tenure-eligible pathways require scholarship
- Scholarship, Research and Creative Activity means
the systematic investigation in some field of
knowledge undertaken to discover or establish
facts or principles, and the scholarly effort to
interpret, integrate or synthesize research
findings or the preparation and execution of
creative projects
11Changing Tracks
- Not casual consult with chair
- Transfer within Tracks 1-3 relatively easier
- Transfer from Tracks 4 or 5 to Tracks 1-3
requires Deans office due to tenure implications
12Changing Tracks
- Tenure clock starts with first appointment at
Assistant Professor rank regardless of track
13Path 1 Clinician / Administrator/ Educator
- Designed to reward physicians who see patients
(typically 75) and do some research,
administration, or education - Primary focus publications reputation
- Referral patterns
- National committees professional organizations
- Review articles, case reports, chapters
14Path 1 Clinician / Administrator/ Educator
- Also appropriate for faculty who spend the
majority of their time on a combination of
clinical care, administration, and/or teaching - Similar to Track 4, but difference is stronger
emphasis on scholarly activity in Track 1
15Path 1
- Grants
- Clinical volumes
- Teaching or administrative accomplishments
- Tenure clock applies must initiate tenure review
by the start of 10th year - Earlier review okay
16Path 1
- Examples of promotable activities for
- Educational Program or Residency Director
- Publish program innovation and evaluation
- Publish review of educational challenge, and
novel approach to addressing it. - Leadership positions in national residency
program directors group - position on national board (American Board of XX,
ACGME - Clinician
- Publish case series, review in major text
- Membership in national board, esp. leadership
positions - leadership in national organizations within the
field - Requests to present on clinical issues as
national meetings of import - Editing text books in the field, major review
issues in journals, etc.
17Path 2 Clinician / Researcher
- Designed to reward physicians who see patients
and do 50 research - Natural home for Clinical Investigators
- Primary focus publications reputation
- Referral patterns
- National committees professional organizations
- Manuscripts higher standard than Path 1
18Path 2
- Grants
- Clinical volumes lower standard than Pathway 1
- Teaching or administrative accomplishments count
but are secondary to research and clinical care
expectations
19Path 3 Primary Research
- Designed for faculty who typically do 75
research - Natural home for Lab-focused MDs and PhDs
- Primary focus publications reputation
- History of funding
- Publications
- Nationally significant research
20Path 3
- Grants Peer reviewed (NIH, Selective
foundations) - Publications expect to be placed in major
journals - Teaching or administrative accomplishments count
but are secondary to research objectives
21Path 4 Clinician
- Designed for faculty who typically do 75
clinical work - As with Track 1, combinations of clinical work,
teaching and administration also fit here - Natural home for pure clinicians
- Primary focus clinical care
- Referral patterns
- National committees professional organizations
- reputation
22Path 4
- Only 4 ranks
- Assistant Professor
- Associate Professor
- Professor
- Professor with Tenure
- Professor with Tenure for a small number of
faculty with national/international repute - No tenure clock
23Path 4
- Can only transfer to Tracks 1-3 during the first
ten years in Path 4
24Path 4
- Grants very secondary
- Publications much less critical, although they
enhance clinical reputation
25Path 5 Researcher
- Designed for faculty who typically do 80
research - Natural home for PhDs in clinical departments
- Primary focus publications funding
- Publications high level journals
- Consistent funding annual appointments
26Path 5
- Teaching or administrative accomplishments count
but are are secondary to research objectives - Most teaching in the context of the research work
27Preparing for Promotion
- Process takes about 1 year
- You should play an active role in the process of
deciding when to go up for promotion - You can bring this up with your Chair/Chief
28Promotion and Tenure Review
- Annually meet with your Chair or Chief to
review your progress. - Are you on the best Track for what you want to
do? - Does your current CV communicate effectively
about your activities? - What areas of your portfolio should be
strengthened?
29Promotion and Tenure Review
- 5 Years be formally reviewed by your
departmental APT committee 5 years after initial
appointment to Assistant Professor. - 10 years - Tenure review should begin no later
than the 10th year on tenure track. - Any time - you may request a promotion/ tenure
review at any time.
30Promotion and Tenure Review Timeline
DAPT Committee forwards recommendation to Chair
Faculty member submits dossier to DAPT Committee
Faculty member invited to submit dossier
Chair forwards to Clinical APT Committee
Final action
3 months
6 months
6 months
1 month
Chair notifies faculty member of DAPT
recommendation
DAPTDepartmental APT
31Dossier
- Curriculum vitae in Duke Format
- Find format at medschool.duke.edu-gt
- Faculty Staff-gt
- General Information-gt
- Curriculum Vitae
- List of publications most representative of your
published work - Evaluators
- External to Duke (at least 6)
- Internal to Duke
- Individuals you dont want contacted
- Personal intellectual statement
32Who does the review?
- Departmental APT Committee
- Department Chair
- School of Medicine Clinical APT Committee
- Dean
- Medical Center Executive Committee
- Trustees
33What should you expect?
- Should have periodic reviews of your progress
- Chair, Division Chief, or Mentor
- One year notice if not to be tenured
- Term appointments may be one year at time
- Rights as faculty are listed in the Faculty
Handbook on the Web - Medschool.duke.edu
- Faculty Staff
- Faculty Handbook
34Secondary Appointments
- Many faculty have 2ndary appointments in another
department - 2ndary department asked to name a faculty member
to act as an ad hoc reviewer within the primary
departments review - 2ndary appointments are to encourage interaction
so departmental participation will be the key
for parallel promotion
35Questions?
- Resources
- Department
- Administrative Liaison
- Faculty Liaison
- Faculty Handbook and APT Guidelines
- http//medschool.duke.edu/
- Select Faculty Staff on Left Bar
- Duke Advantages for Faculty
- http//www.provost.duke.edu/faculty/
- Office for Faculty Development
36Examples for discussion
- What track would be appropriate for
- A CFM faculty member who is 25 clinical, 50
teaching and administration - A Student Advising Dean who is 25 clinical, 75
administrative - A Physical Therapy faculty member who has
seasonal teaching obligations
37(No Transcript)