Website: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Website:

Description:

Guide _at_ 0.22. Guide _at_ 4.69. Only Source / Footnotes below this line. Introduction ... electricity, a market for RECs can and will form, and some areas will be buyers ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: narucme
Category:
Tags: website

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Website:


1
Perspectives on Renewable Portfolio Standard
Authority
  • NARUC Summer 2007
  • July 17, 2007
  • Richard Sedano

2
Introduction
  • Regulatory Assistance Project
  • RAP is a non-profit organization, formed in 1992,
    that provides workshops and education assistance
    to state government officials on electric utility
    regulation. RAP is funded by the Energy
    Foundation, US EPA US DOE.
  • Richard Sedano was Commissioner of the Vermont
    Department of Public Service, 1991-2001

3
DSIRE www.dsireusa.org


June 2007
Renewables Portfolio Standards
ME 30 by 2000 10 by 2017 goal - new RE
MN 25 by 2025 (Xcel 30 by 2020)
VT RE meets load growth by 2012
WA 15 by 2020
  • NH 23.8 in 2025

WI requirement varies by utility 10 by 2015
goal
MA 4 by 2009 1 annual increase
MT 15 by 2015
OR 25 by 2025 (large utilities) 5 - 10 by
2025 for smaller utilities
RI 15 by 2020
CT 23 by 2020
IA 105 MW
  • NV 20 by 2015
  • NY 24 by 2013
  • NJ 22.5 by 2021
  • CO 20 by 2020 (IOUs)
  • 10 by 2020 (co-ops large munis)

IL 8 by 2013
  • PA 18¹ by 2020

CA 20 by 2010
MO 11 by 2020
  • MD 9.5 in 2022

NM 20 by 2020 (IOUs) 10 by 2020 (co-ops)
  • AZ 15 by 2025

DE 10 by 2019
  • DC 11 by 2022

VA 12 by 2022
TX 5,880 MW by 2015
State RPS
HI 20 by 2020
State Goal
  • Minimum solar or customer-sited RE requirement
  • Increased credit for solar or customer-sited RE
  • ¹PA 8 Tier I / 10 Tier II (includes
    non-renewables) SWH is a Tier II resource

Solar water heating (SWH) eligible
4
Some RPS Purposes
  • Public, structured commitment to selected
    resources that gets results
  • Impresses the public
  • Impresses qualifying resource development teams
    and inspires their confidence
  • Takes guess work out of public value of
    renewables (avoids other sources) for monopoly
    service and is competitively neutral
  • Can be part of a coherent clean energy strategy
  • Market solution (not like PURPA QF contracts)
  • Targets may stretch out in time ahead of supply

5
(Should we be saying Clean Energy Standard?)
  • Choice of resources mixed policy considerations
    (expansive as possible)
  • Truly renewable in nature
  • High efficiency DG sources
  • Tending to be locally available
  • Addressing other economic development or
    environmental or political issues
  • Energy efficiency, demand response

6
A National RPS
  • Extends purposes to all states applying uniformly
    to all customers (requirement, not a goal)
  • Applies to utilities of all ownership structures
  • Applies consistently to all states, including
    those without sufficient impetus to adopt a state
    standard
  • Would need national tracking system, which may be
    able to meld current regional systems (A REC is A
    REC is A REC, no double counting)
  • What about states that have adopted a standard
    will the national standard accommodate or
    obliterate state standards?

7
It Depends
  • National RPS can be flexible, accommodating all
    categories of most states
  • Some administrative process that is relatively
    easy to manage will keep the categories fresh
  • States should be able to qualify what they want
    for their own standard
  • National RPS can establish a minimum standard of
    renewable energy and alternative compliance,
    states can exceed it

8
State Concerns
  • Preemption (on resource and cost recovery)
  • Fed RPS wont shield states from cost concern
  • Absence of locally available renewables
  • Most states have some renewable sources, but as
    with current regional markets for electricity
    supply and demand of electricity, a market for
    RECs can and will form, and some areas will be
    buyers
  • Rates (compared with past or future?)
  • Consistency in definition (states already have
    tiers) and alternative compliance (sum, state CE
    funds)

9
Other Concern
  • Encouraging new renewable sources while crediting
    existing renewable ones
  • Underscores the game that a portfolio standard
    creates
  • Best bang for buck of ratepayer dollar focuses
    on new sources
  • Existing units use fairness argument to win a
    place in the system
  • State systems work this out (tiers seems best
    way), no national consistency

10
Other Concern
  • Deliverability does power associated with the
    REC need to be deliverable within the market
    where the REC is sold?
  • National program would probably include no
    requirement for deliverability
  • Makes market much thicker renewable rich areas
    can mine RECs for the whole country
  • May strain credulity of public, or not

11
Why Cant We All Just Get Along?
  • Growing consensus on need for alternative, clean
    generating sources gtgt imperative?
  • Question of whether lack of state actions is OK
    -- does there needs to be a base?
  • Federalism vs. Commitment
  • Federal RPS perspective Measure benefit to
    climate compared with other solutions

12
The Regulatory Assistance Project
  • RAP Mission
  • RAP is committed to fostering regulatory policies
    for the electric industry that encourage economic
    efficiency, protect environmental quality, assure
    system reliability, and allocate system benefits
    fairly to all customers.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com