Title: Global Climate Change
1Global Climate Change
2Key Policy Documents
- United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change - Kyoto Protocol
3Some Background Stuff
- Environmental problems public policy responses
take place at the juncture of the natural world
and human behavior, which can be frustrating - But, this is the hand which we have been dealt,
so
4Human Realities
- Market failure (externalities)
- Time frames
- Our life span
- Election cycle
- Jurisdictional (political) boundaries
- International
- National
5Human Realities, cont.
- Different actors, different positions
- Getting agreement on anything often requires
bargaining, compromise
6International Environmental Policy Formation
Takes Place
- In the context of national sovereignty
- Through negotiations leading to treaties among
sovereign states - In an effort to form regimes (sets of
institutions, agreed-upon behaviors, etc. aimed
at addressing a problem or issue - Conventions
- Protocols
7National Sovereignty
- Nation states may largely do as they wish within
their own boundaries - Cooperation on boundary-spanning problems is
necessary, but is often difficult to achieve - Nations may agree to cooperate with others, but
- There is no authoritative international
legislative body - There is no authoritative international executive
- So, as a general rule, nation states may not be
compelled to do that which they do not wish to
do, or not do that which they do wish to do
8Conventions
- What?
- Multiparty treaties
- Aimed at establishing cooperation in responding
to a specific issue or set of issues - May be joined by additional nations after having
been adopted
9Some Important Terms
- Signatories - The nations which have signed the
treaty - Parties - The nations which have signed
ratified the agreement (i.e. are full
participants in the agreement) - Secretariat -- The administrative body which is
responsible for implementing the agreement (may
be UN body, e.g. UNEP, or free standing, e.g.
Climate Change)
10Some Important Terms, cont.
- Framework conventions
- Establish basic procedures, or rules of the
game for dealing with a problem - May include a little substance (but not much)
- Frequently provide for a regular Conference of
Parties (COP) - Meetings of nations party to the treaty (,
often, other interested parties) to discuss
implementation, progress, enforcement,
modifications, etc.
11Some Important Terms, cont.
- Protocols Follow up agreements which deal with
substance - e.g. Vienna Convention on Ozone (1985) Montreal
Protocol (1987 1990) - Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992)
Kyoto Protocol (1997) - NGOs IGOs
12NGOs (Non-governmental Organizations )
- Private interest groups (e.g. Greenpeace)
- Often lobby/pressure national governments
international meetings - Have been very active in climate change
- Have a (sort of) formal role in Kyoto
13IGOs or INGOs (International Governmental
Organizations )
- International bureaucracies, often affiliated
with the United Nations - Can play an important role
- Agenda-setting
- Implementation
- Funds handling
14A Few Important IGOs
- United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP)
- United Nations Development Program (UNDP)
- Global Environment Facility (GEF)
- A funding entity designed do aid developing
nations afford the costs of environmental
protection - Originally got its funding from World Bank UNEP
15Negotiating Environmental Treaties
- Environmental treaties are negotiated on an ad
hoc basis - Participants are self-selected
- One nation, one vote
- Nation states negotiate vote
- NGOs do not - but they can lobby (depending on
circumstances) participate in discussions
16Negotiating Environmental Treaties, cont.
- North South (developing nations v. developed
nations) disputes are common, and have influenced
the climate change debate - Treaties with global implications may be
negotiated by a minority of nations - Treaty negotiations may not include key nations
- Treaties which are in force may not include key
nations
17Nation States Environmental Treaties
- Their international positions arise from
- Domestic political factors
- National (self?) interest
- Perceived costs, risks ( benefits) of an
environmental regime - International politics
- Subnational actors (states, cities)
- Existing commitments (treaties, etc.)
- Scientific evidence
18Nation States Environmental Treaties, cont.
- They play various roles in making international
environmental policy - Lead state
- Supporting State
- Swing state
- Veto state
19The U.S. International Climate Change Policy
- We participated in the negotiations leading up to
the Framework Convention on Climate Change the
Kyoto Protocol - We signed both treaties
- We have ratified the Framework Convention, but
not the Kyoto Protocol ( President Bush has
indicated that he will not push to do so)
20U.S. Treaty Processes
- Ratification
- If he wishes to try for ratification, the
president must submit the treaty to the Senate
for ratification approval - The Foreign Affairs committee (, possibly, other
committees) review it, , if they wish to do so,
send it to the full Senate for vote - A two-thirds majority is necessary for
ratification - Clinton, Bush Kyoto
21U.S. Treaty Processes, cont.
- Implementing legislation
- Many treaties are not complete in of
themselves. The Congress must pass further
(implementing) legislation before we really begin
to perform our treaty obligations (e.g. the
Montreal Protocol the 1990 Clean Air Act
Amendments) - Goes through ordinary legislative procedures
- Simple majorities (50 plus one) in both houses
- Committees
- Presidential approval
22U.S. Treaty Processes, cont.
- After implementing legislation has been adopted
it may be subjected to court challenge - It must be implemented by the bureaucracy
- Assignment to a specific agency
- Funding, etc.
- Rule-making procedures are complex, so are
enforcement actions
23Things To Remember About U.S. Policy Making
Processes
- There are a lot of opportunities to kill proposed
policies (e.g. a treaty ratification), proponents
must win in all venues, opponents need only win
in one - Even winning in the Congress White House does
not guarantee success
24Factors Influencing U.S. Climate Change Policy
- American preference for incremental approaches to
policy making - Concerns re.
- China, India ( other developing nations)
- Impact on our economy
- Partisanship
- Political Seasons
- Other political agenda items
- Interest groups
- And many other factors
25Climate Change Convention
- Negotiated prior to 1992 Earth Summit, but
opened for signing at that conference - 40 Annex 1 nations (largely industrialized)
agreed to take the lead role in cutting projected
2000 emissions back to 1990 levels. - No deadlines
- No post-2000 targets
26Climate Change Convention, cont.
- Entered into force in 1994 when the necessary 50
nations had ratified - Weak on specifics due to
- U.S. opposition
- Developing nations opposition to having emissions
controls applied to themselves - Support for a stronger treaty appeared early (at
first COP)
27Kyoto Protocol Provisions
- Annex 1 (industrialized) nations
- Agreed to reduce their overall greenhouse gas
emissions by at least 5.2 below 1990 levels
between 2008 2012 - Some differentiation on target reductions among
those nations (see Table 2) - Developing nations
- No targeted reductions
- No opt-in clause whereby developing nations
could voluntarily adopt emissions reduction
targets
28Kyoto Provisions, cont.
- Flexibility mechanisms (for cost control)
- Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)
- Developed nations may finance projects that
reduce 3rd world emissions, thereby gaining
credits applicable to their own mandatory limits - E.g Carbon sinks
- Joint Implementation
- Similar to CDM, but involves western,
market-oriented nations and former Soviet bloc
nations (economies in transition)
29Kyoto Provisions, cont.
- Emissions trading
- Annex 1 nations which have achieved their
commitments can sell excess emissions credits to
other Annex 1 nations which are having
difficulties in meeting their credits - A U.S. initiative, based on similar provisions in
1990 Clean Air Act amendments
30Bringing Kyoto Into Force
- Needed to be ratified by 55 nations, representing
55 of 1990 CO2 emissions - U.S. is biggest emitter, our refusal to ratify
made it difficult to assemble the required number
of right ratifications, and - Encouraged some nations to seek special deals in
return for their ratification (e.g. Russia
Ukraine need not reduce below their 1990 levels)
31Some Issues With Kyoto
- Are the regimes goals mechanisms sufficient to
accomplish goals? In a meaningful time frame? - Will emissions trading be effective at the
international level? - Weak enforcement mechanisms
- Special treatment for Russia (not required to
reduce below 1990 levels, lots of unused
Soviet-era industrial capacity, etc.)
32Some Issues, cont.
- Compliance
- Reporting, etc. is weak, may be difficult to tell
when a nation is not complying - What to do if a nation is not complying?
- Developing nations
- Some are not big contributors to the problem, but
others are - Makes it more difficult to persuade national
leaders to agree to the treaty
33Some Issues, cont.
- Can the regime be effective without U.S. (
Australia) ratification
34The U.S. Current Policy
- Based on
- Some questioning of the existence of climate
change - Belief that human activity doesnt cause it
- Belief that it will not be disruptive, etc.
- Kyoto will not go to the Senate
- Voluntary controls
35Kyoto The U.S.
- Could Still Be Ratified
- Things can change rapidly (e.g. acid rain 1990
CAAA) - Elections
- Agenda setting
36Is Kyoto Ratification Necessary?
- State-level action is always possible
- California
- Federal legislation, even in the absence of
ratification, could accomplish worthwhile
objectives - Incremental change can accomplish a lot
- Politics is different, may be an easier sell
- E.g.s carbon taxes, subsidies for clean
technologies initiatives
37(No Transcript)