Global Climate Change - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Global Climate Change

Description:

Election cycle. Jurisdictional (political) boundaries. International. National. 5 ... Elections 'Agenda setting' 36. Is Kyoto Ratification Necessary? ... California ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: Facul74
Category:
Tags: change | climate | global

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Global Climate Change


1
Global Climate Change
  • And Public Policy

2
Key Policy Documents
  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
    Change  
  • Kyoto Protocol

3
Some Background Stuff
  • Environmental problems public policy responses
    take place at the juncture of the natural world
    and human behavior, which can be frustrating
  • But, this is the hand which we have been dealt,
    so

4
Human Realities
  • Market failure (externalities)
  • Time frames
  • Our life span
  • Election cycle
  • Jurisdictional (political) boundaries
  • International
  • National

5
Human Realities, cont.
  • Different actors, different positions
  • Getting agreement on anything often requires
    bargaining, compromise

6
International Environmental Policy Formation
Takes Place
  • In the context of national sovereignty
  • Through negotiations leading to treaties among
    sovereign states
  • In an effort to form regimes (sets of
    institutions, agreed-upon behaviors, etc. aimed
    at addressing a problem or issue
  • Conventions
  • Protocols

7
National Sovereignty
  • Nation states may largely do as they wish within
    their own boundaries
  • Cooperation on boundary-spanning problems is
    necessary, but is often difficult to achieve
  • Nations may agree to cooperate with others, but
  • There is no authoritative international
    legislative body
  • There is no authoritative international executive
  • So, as a general rule, nation states may not be
    compelled to do that which they do not wish to
    do, or not do that which they do wish to do

8
Conventions
  • What?
  • Multiparty treaties
  • Aimed at establishing cooperation in responding
    to a specific issue or set of issues
  • May be joined by additional nations after having
    been adopted

9
Some Important Terms
  • Signatories - The nations which have signed the
    treaty
  • Parties - The nations which have signed
    ratified the agreement (i.e. are full
    participants in the agreement)
  • Secretariat -- The administrative body which is
    responsible for implementing the agreement (may
    be UN body, e.g. UNEP, or free standing, e.g.
    Climate Change)

10
Some Important Terms, cont.
  • Framework conventions
  • Establish basic procedures, or rules of the
    game for dealing with a problem
  • May include a little substance (but not much)
  • Frequently provide for a regular Conference of
    Parties (COP)
  • Meetings of nations party to the treaty (,
    often, other interested parties) to discuss
    implementation, progress, enforcement,
    modifications, etc.

11
Some Important Terms, cont.
  • Protocols Follow up agreements which deal with
    substance
  • e.g. Vienna Convention on Ozone (1985) Montreal
    Protocol (1987 1990)
  • Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992)
    Kyoto Protocol (1997)
  • NGOs IGOs

12
NGOs (Non-governmental Organizations )
  • Private interest groups (e.g. Greenpeace)
  • Often lobby/pressure national governments
    international meetings
  • Have been very active in climate change
  • Have a (sort of) formal role in Kyoto

13
IGOs or INGOs (International Governmental
Organizations )
  • International bureaucracies, often affiliated
    with the United Nations
  • Can play an important role
  • Agenda-setting
  • Implementation
  • Funds handling

14
A Few Important IGOs
  • United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP)
  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP)
  • Global Environment Facility (GEF)
  • A funding entity designed do aid developing
    nations afford the costs of environmental
    protection
  • Originally got its funding from World Bank UNEP

15
Negotiating Environmental Treaties
  • Environmental treaties are negotiated on an ad
    hoc basis
  • Participants are self-selected
  • One nation, one vote
  • Nation states negotiate vote
  • NGOs do not - but they can lobby (depending on
    circumstances) participate in discussions

16
Negotiating Environmental Treaties, cont.
  • North South (developing nations v. developed
    nations) disputes are common, and have influenced
    the climate change debate
  • Treaties with global implications may be
    negotiated by a minority of nations
  • Treaty negotiations may not include key nations
  • Treaties which are in force may not include key
    nations

17
Nation States Environmental Treaties
  • Their international positions arise from
  • Domestic political factors
  • National (self?) interest
  • Perceived costs, risks ( benefits) of an
    environmental regime
  • International politics
  • Subnational actors (states, cities)
  • Existing commitments (treaties, etc.)
  • Scientific evidence

18
Nation States Environmental Treaties, cont.
  • They play various roles in making international
    environmental policy
  • Lead state
  • Supporting State
  • Swing state
  • Veto state

19
The U.S. International Climate Change Policy
  • We participated in the negotiations leading up to
    the Framework Convention on Climate Change the
    Kyoto Protocol
  • We signed both treaties
  • We have ratified the Framework Convention, but
    not the Kyoto Protocol ( President Bush has
    indicated that he will not push to do so)

20
U.S. Treaty Processes
  • Ratification
  • If he wishes to try for ratification, the
    president must submit the treaty to the Senate
    for ratification approval
  • The Foreign Affairs committee (, possibly, other
    committees) review it, , if they wish to do so,
    send it to the full Senate for vote
  • A two-thirds majority is necessary for
    ratification
  • Clinton, Bush Kyoto

21
U.S. Treaty Processes, cont.
  • Implementing legislation
  • Many treaties are not complete in of
    themselves. The Congress must pass further
    (implementing) legislation before we really begin
    to perform our treaty obligations (e.g. the
    Montreal Protocol the 1990 Clean Air Act
    Amendments)
  • Goes through ordinary legislative procedures
  • Simple majorities (50 plus one) in both houses
  • Committees
  • Presidential approval

22
U.S. Treaty Processes, cont.
  • After implementing legislation has been adopted
    it may be subjected to court challenge
  • It must be implemented by the bureaucracy
  • Assignment to a specific agency
  • Funding, etc.
  • Rule-making procedures are complex, so are
    enforcement actions

23
Things To Remember About U.S. Policy Making
Processes
  • There are a lot of opportunities to kill proposed
    policies (e.g. a treaty ratification), proponents
    must win in all venues, opponents need only win
    in one
  • Even winning in the Congress White House does
    not guarantee success

24
Factors Influencing U.S. Climate Change Policy
  • American preference for incremental approaches to
    policy making
  • Concerns re.
  • China, India ( other developing nations)
  • Impact on our economy
  • Partisanship
  • Political Seasons
  • Other political agenda items
  • Interest groups
  • And many other factors

25
Climate Change Convention
  • Negotiated prior to 1992 Earth Summit, but
    opened for signing at that conference
  • 40 Annex 1 nations (largely industrialized)
    agreed to take the lead role in cutting projected
    2000 emissions back to 1990 levels.
  • No deadlines
  • No post-2000 targets

26
Climate Change Convention, cont.
  • Entered into force in 1994 when the necessary 50
    nations had ratified
  • Weak on specifics due to
  • U.S. opposition
  • Developing nations opposition to having emissions
    controls applied to themselves
  • Support for a stronger treaty appeared early (at
    first COP)

27
Kyoto Protocol Provisions
  • Annex 1 (industrialized) nations
  • Agreed to reduce their overall greenhouse gas
    emissions by at least 5.2 below 1990 levels
    between 2008 2012
  • Some differentiation on target reductions among
    those nations (see Table 2)
  • Developing nations
  • No targeted reductions
  • No opt-in clause whereby developing nations
    could voluntarily adopt emissions reduction
    targets

28
Kyoto Provisions, cont.
  • Flexibility mechanisms (for cost control)
  • Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)
  • Developed nations may finance projects that
    reduce 3rd world emissions, thereby gaining
    credits applicable to their own mandatory limits
  • E.g Carbon sinks
  • Joint Implementation
  • Similar to CDM, but involves western,
    market-oriented nations and former Soviet bloc
    nations (economies in transition)

29
Kyoto Provisions, cont.
  • Emissions trading
  • Annex 1 nations which have achieved their
    commitments can sell excess emissions credits to
    other Annex 1 nations which are having
    difficulties in meeting their credits
  • A U.S. initiative, based on similar provisions in
    1990 Clean Air Act amendments

30
Bringing Kyoto Into Force
  • Needed to be ratified by 55 nations, representing
    55 of 1990 CO2 emissions
  • U.S. is biggest emitter, our refusal to ratify
    made it difficult to assemble the required number
    of right ratifications, and
  • Encouraged some nations to seek special deals in
    return for their ratification (e.g. Russia
    Ukraine need not reduce below their 1990 levels)

31
Some Issues With Kyoto
  • Are the regimes goals mechanisms sufficient to
    accomplish goals? In a meaningful time frame?
  • Will emissions trading be effective at the
    international level?
  • Weak enforcement mechanisms
  • Special treatment for Russia (not required to
    reduce below 1990 levels, lots of unused
    Soviet-era industrial capacity, etc.)

32
Some Issues, cont.
  • Compliance
  • Reporting, etc. is weak, may be difficult to tell
    when a nation is not complying
  • What to do if a nation is not complying?
  • Developing nations
  • Some are not big contributors to the problem, but
    others are
  • Makes it more difficult to persuade national
    leaders to agree to the treaty

33
Some Issues, cont.
  • Can the regime be effective without U.S. (
    Australia) ratification

34
The U.S. Current Policy
  • Based on
  • Some questioning of the existence of climate
    change
  • Belief that human activity doesnt cause it
  • Belief that it will not be disruptive, etc.
  • Kyoto will not go to the Senate
  • Voluntary controls

35
Kyoto The U.S.
  • Could Still Be Ratified
  • Things can change rapidly (e.g. acid rain 1990
    CAAA)
  • Elections
  • Agenda setting

36
Is Kyoto Ratification Necessary?
  • State-level action is always possible
  • California
  • Federal legislation, even in the absence of
    ratification, could accomplish worthwhile
    objectives
  • Incremental change can accomplish a lot
  • Politics is different, may be an easier sell
  • E.g.s carbon taxes, subsidies for clean
    technologies initiatives

37
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com