Ohio Statewide Model

1
Ohio Statewide Model

• Passenger Transit
• Calibration

Pat Costinett Greg Erhardt Rebekah Anderson
2
Ohio Statewide Model

• Needs Study Conducted in 1998/99
• Primary Goals
• reducing / minimizing / avoiding roadway
  congestion and delay
• sustaining and improving the state economy
• freight planning, particularly with regard to the
  management of truck traffic and the potential for
  shifting it to other routes and modes

3
Ohio Statewide Model

• Secondary Goals Include
• supporting multi-modal/inter-modal options for
  travel, passenger and freight
• improving conditions for non-auto (and
  non-single-occupant auto) mode services
• Passenger Models Are Applied Disaggregately and
  Are Tour-Based

4
Ohio Integrated Land Use/Economic/ Transport Model
5
Passenger Mode Choice Models

• Short Distance Tours Under 50 miles
• Walk or Drive to MPO Transit
• Long Distance Tours Inside Model Area
• Allow all Transit Alternatives
• Long Distance Tours E-E or I-E
• Apply Static Mode Shares by Distance

6
Mode Choice
High Speed Rail only in future-years
0.65
0.5
0.5
Transit-Drive
HSR-Drive
HSR-Walk
Transit-Walk
Air
Auto
7
Networks

• Highway
• Including Ohio Turnpike
• Transit
• MPO Transit
• Greyhound
• Amtrak
• High Speed Rail
• Air

• Freight
• Highway
• Rail

8
Ohio Networks
9
Ohio Transit Networks - Local
1098 Local Transit Lines
10
Greyhound and Amtrak - 2000
55 Greyhound Routes 4 Amtrak Trains Added Links
to Connect Greyhound and Amtrak Stations
11
Air Network

• Used 1999 10 Airline Ticket Sample to Select
  City-Pairs that Have More than 10 Trips/Day
• Ft. Wayne Cvd
• Dayton Cvd
• Cincinnati - Cvd

12
Ohio Hub Study

• MWRRI Completed Update in 2004
• Ohio Hub Study Undertaken to Complement the MWRRI
  2005 with 2007 Update
• 2 Scenarios
• Modern Scenario 79 mph speeds
• High Speed Scenario 110 mph speeds

13
Ohio Hub

• Pittsburgh Cleveland Toledo Ft. Wayne
• Cleveland Columbus Cincinnati
• Pittsburgh Columbus Ft. Wayne
• Columbus Toledo

14
Internal Mode Choice

• Asserted based on review of literature
• Cannot determine access mode from survey

15
External Mode Choice
Increases Air share as a function of distance
16
2000 Validation Efforts

• System Ridership by MPO Good Data
• Greyhound Ridership by City Pair - Annual
• Amtrak Ridership by City Pair Annual

17
2000 Validation 4/30/07
18
2000 Validation 5/2/07
19
2000 Validation 5/4/07
20
2000 Validation 5/2/07
21
2000 Validation 5/4/07
22
2000 Validation 5/2/07
23
2000 Validation 5/4/07
24
2030 Calibration Efforts

• Mode / Line Totals
• Passenger Miles / Average Trip Lengths
• Annual Passengers by City Pair

25
2000 High Speed Rail 5/2/07
26
2000 High Speed Rail 5/2/07
27
2000 High Speed Rail 5/2/07
28
2000 High Speed Rail 5/2/07
29
2000 High Speed Rail 5/2/07
30

• Rebekah Anderson 614-752-5735
• Ohio DOT
• Greg Erhardt 415-243-4638
• Pat Costinett 206-382-5218
• PB