Choosing a Research Question - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Choosing a Research Question

Description:

Many papers get rejected because they do not have a ... cost - ' the data were cheap and easy to obtain (e.g., AWIRS) ... Expedience: cheap, quick and easy ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: morr77
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Choosing a Research Question


1
Choosing a Research Question
  • Week 3
  • 506
  • 2000

2
The Research Process
  • Identify Research Question

Choose Method
Locate needed instrumentation
Develop Instrumentation
Develop data analytic procedures
Choose data analytic strategy
Implement Study
Communicate Findings
3
Type of Research
4
Developing a research Question
  • Questions are the engine that drive the research
    enterprise
  • method, sample, settings, variables all follow.
  • Many papers get rejected because they do not have
    a discernible question.
  • An assessment of the questions importance also
    determines publication - more than methodology or
    presentation style.

5
Choice of Question
  • Internal Factors
  • Curiosity - I wonder what would happen if?
  • Compassion -
  • Confirmability - easy replication
  • Conformity - fad
  • Predilection - skill, temperament, contacts or
    training

6
Choice of Question
  • External Factors
  • a question determined by someone other than the
    researcher
  • cost - the data were cheap and easy to obtain
    (e.g., AWIRS)
  • resource availability (opportunism)
  • reward system - certain types of research are
    rewarded
  • propinquity - what are the interests of potential
    collaborators

7
Significance comes from ...
  • Activity Contacts with colleagues and
    organisations rather than thinking in isolation
  • Intrinsic interest and motivation excitement and
    commitment

8
Lack of significance ...
  • Expedience cheap, quick and easy
  • Lack of interest in the question motivated by
    external outcome

9
Where do questions come from?
  • Theory based questions (13) (highly regarded)
  • tests of predictions
  • comparison of theories
  • Applied problem (3) (not highly regarded)
  • problems defined by and limited to a single
    organisation or tightly defined problem
  • Build on existing literature (84) (not highly
    regarded)
  • use different subject population
  • different operationalisation of 1 or more
    variables
  • include different levels of a variable studied
    previously
  • simultaneously study variables that have only
    been examined independently
  • include moderators or mediators
  • add an additional variable

10
The form of the question
  • the description of a single variable
  • operationalisation of a construct and aspects of
    its distribution
  • not as common as it should be
  • the interrelationships between variables
  • is there an association between variables?
  • is there a causal relationship
  • under what conditions are they associated and in
    what way (moderator, or mediator)
  • does variable Z add to the prediction of y after
    x has been extracted?

11
Choice of methodology
  • The research question dictates the method
  • is it true that 75 of students cheat?
  • I believe that cheating is determined by peer
    group pressure - are there high rates of
    cheating among certain types of students?
  • this is very applied and does not offer an
    explanation

12
Choice of methodology2 variables
  • Are students of low moral fibre likely to cheat?
  • introduces 2 variables if the variables are
    measured simultaneously there is little other
    than correlations can be done
  • experimental methods of some kind are needed to
    infer causality

13
Choice of methodology 3 variables
  • Do peers who vary in moral fibre influence
    cheating amongst individuals who vary in moral
    fibre
  • this introduces a whole new set of issues that
    dictates methods and analysis
  • does peer level of moral fibre influence cheating
    independently of individual level of moral fibre
  • does peer level of moral fibre influence
    individual moral fibre which in turn influences
    cheating (mediation)
  • is the strength of the moral fibre cheating
    relationship differentially influenced by level
    of peer moral fibre (moderation)
  • how well can cheating be predicted from moral
    fibre of individuals and peers
  • Such questions influence the decision on methods
    to observe or manipulate, to measure once or
    repeatedly

14
The unit of analysis
  • Should we look at the individual level or at the
    unit level, (faculty, department, university) or
    a multiple levels
  • why are there differences among faculties?
  • are all the departments within a faculty the
    same?

15
Critical minimal criteria
  • the ultimate goals of the research will be clear
    to sponsors and to consumers of the research if
    the following are specified
  • the participants, setting and variables of
    interest (extent of generalisation)
  • the nature of the relationship that is being
    investigated and when it is expected to be found
    (correlational vs causal)
  • the form of the relationship (mediation,
    moderation)
  • the unit of analysis (individual, group,
    organisation)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com