Radar Imaging and Waveform Design - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Radar Imaging and Waveform Design

Description:

... flight path in the presence of noise and interference B. Yazici and M. Cheney. Conclusions ... Range-Doppler imaging and waveform design based on ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:650
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: bjhpch23mk
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Radar Imaging and Waveform Design


1
Radar Imaging and Waveform Design
  • Birsen Yazici
  • Electrical, Computer and Systems Engineering
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
  • May 26, 2005

2
Outline
  • Range-Doppler imaging and adaptive diversity
    waveform design B. Yazici and G. Xie
  • Synthetic aperture inversion for arbitrary flight
    path in the presence of noise and interference
    B. Yazici and M. Cheney
  • Conclusions

3
Filtered Backprojection Method
  • Range-Doppler imaging and waveform design based
    on simplified forward model that takes advantage
    of underlying invariant structure
  • SAR imaging based on physics based forward model
    that takes into antenna beam pattern, array
    configuration, transmitted pulse, geometric
    spreading factors and flight path

4
Range-Doppler Imaging
  • Ideal point target model
  • Ideal extended target model

Doppler stretch
Time delay
Target reflectivity function
5
Clutter/Interference and Noise Models
  • Target Object of interest
  • Clutter All unwanted reflections and other
    scatterers
  • Noise Thermal noise at the receiver

6
Problem Statement
  • How do we recover target reflectivity function
    embedded in noise and clutter?
  • What waveform(s) shall we transmit?
  • To suppress noise clutter/interference
  • For simultaneous estimation of target velocity
    and range

7
Approach
  • View received echo from target as the Fourier
    transform of the target with respect to affine
    group evaluated at the transmitted waveform
  • Fourier transform of functions defined on range
    and Doppler plans is not equal to the standard
    Fourier transforms with respect to range and
    Doppler
  • Fourier transform of functions defined on
    range-Doppler plane is a matrix valued function

8
Advantages
  • Address receiver and waveform design problems
    simultaneously
  • Bypasses the concept of ambiguity function
  • Waveform design for simultaneous estimation of
    target range and velocity
  • Provides design of clutter rejecting waveforms
  • Method of data fusion to synthesize high
    resolution range-Doppler images from multiple
    narrowband radars operating coherently

9
How to Estimate Target
  • Send sufficient number of pulses to cover the
    spectrum of the target
  • Use Fourier inversion formula for reconstruction
    Filtered back projection

10
How to Suppress Clutter/Interference
  • Perform minimum mean square error filtering based
    on the spectra of target and clutter/interference
  • Optimal MMSE filter spectrum
  • Optimal filtering

11
Range-Doppler Image
  • Implement inverse Fourier transform in different
    ways to obtain different receiver and waveform
    design algorithms
  • Only need the diagonal terms for trace sum
  • Alternatively use matrix elements of each
    transform

12
Algorithm 1
13
Algorithm 2
14
Numerical Simulations
  • Transmit waveforms derived from Laguerre
    polynomials

Target
Clutter
15
Numerical Simulations
Wiener Filter
Difference between waveforms used in Algorithm 2
and deterministic algorithm
16
Numerical Simulations
Algorithm 2
Deterministic algorithm
Algorithm 1
Comparison of Algorithm 1, Algorithm 2 and
deterministic algorithm
17
Conclusions
  • Clutter rejection can be performed either in
    transmission or reception
  • Clutter rejection in transmission reduces
    receiver complexity
  • In adaptive transmission, matching is NOT
    performed with respect to transmitted waveforms
  • No limitation in the choice of orthogonal basis,
    but should be in the range space of the Wiener
    filter to avoid redundancy
  • Algorithms applicable to MIMO scenario
  • Narrowband case
  • Discrete affine group

18
SAR inversion for arbitrary flight path in the
presence of noise and interference
19
Forward Model
20
Problem Statement
  • Received data model
  • C unwanted ground reflectivity function
  • n additive noise.
  • Problem determine from .

21
Noise and Interference Model
  • Additive noise model Stationary in fast time,
    uncorrelated in slow time
  • Target and interference model Not necessarily
    stationary

22
Image Formation
  • Form image by filtered back projection
  • Determined by minimizing the mean square
    error

23
How to solve for the filter?
  • Apply change of variables so that when the
    forward and inverse map are composed the
    resulting operator is a pseudo differential
    operator.
  • Perform stationary phase calculations to
    determine the leading order contributions to mean
    square error
  • Perform variational calculations with respect to Q

24
How to solve for the filter?
  • In general the filter is the solution of an
    integral equation
  • If we assume that the target and interference are
    stationary then,
  • Jacobian coming from the change of variables
  • When filter becomes

25
Numerical Simulations
Target
Target and interference
Deterministic FBP reconstruction
Statistical FBP reconstruction
26
Numerical Simulations
Target
Statistical FBP reconstruction
Details of statistical FBP
Deterministic FBP reconstruction
Details of deterministic FBP
Target and interference
27
Numerical Simulation
28
Conclusion
  • Microlocal reconstruction extended to a
    statistical setting
  • Bistatic and multistatic mode of operation
  • Design of flight trajectories for multistatic
    UAVs
  • Design of waveforms

29
Inversion Methods
  • Solving PDEs (Bellini et al. 1979)
  • Filtered backprojection (Tretiak et al. 1980,
    Metz et al. 1995, Kuchment et al. 1994)
  • Fourier Relation (Tretiak et al., Innouye et al.
    1989, Metz Pan, Kuchment et al.)
  • Circular harmonic decomposition (Hawkins et al.
    1988)

30
Fourier Transform of the Affine Group
  • Irreducible unitary representations of the affine
    group
  • Fourier transform
  • Fourier inversion
  • Discrepancy operator
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com