Performance Audit - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Performance Audit

Description:

Congressional Appropriations. Receive no competitive review ... should address its role in the process of direct congressional appropriations. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: diedra8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Performance Audit


1
Performance Audit
  • Montana University System
  • Research and Development

2
Introduction
  • Research and Development (RD)
  • Technology Transfer
  • Prioritized by the Legislative Audit Committee
    for the 2005 biennium
  • Audit objectives addressed
  • Whether the MUS manages RD resources and funding
    effectively.
  • If the MUS has an efficient and effective process
    for protecting and commercializing services,
    products, or creative works created through RD.
  • The impact of MUS RD and technology transfer
    activities on the states economy.

3
MUS Research Expenditures
4
Research Administration
Recommendation 1 The Board of Regents should
ensure consistent reporting of data relating to
research activities on MUS campuses. Recommendat
ion 2 The Board of Regents should coordinate
the use of information systems within research
administration functions. Recommendation
3 The University of Montana-Missoula should
assign pre-award staff by departmental
specialization. Recommendation 4 The
University System should develop and implement
mandatory training addressing core elements and
provide additional training as needed.
5
Congressional Appropriations
MUS Congressional Earmarks and Lobbying
Expenditures Fiscal Year 1990 to Fiscal Year 2006
6
Congressional Appropriations
  • Receive no competitive review
  • Currently receive no review from the Board
  • Earmarks have become a more important source of
    research funding
  • Recommendation 5
  • The Montana Board of Regents should address its
    role in the process of direct congressional
    appropriations.

7
Technology Transfer Functions
  • Recommendation 6
  • The Board of Regents should revise timeframes
    for technology transfer processes outlined in
    policy number 401.2.
  • Recommendation 7
  • The Board of Regents should review and refine
    methodologies for capitalizing intellectual
    property as intangible assets.
  • Recommendation 8
  • The University System should ensure technology
    transfer issues receive sufficient emphasis in
    training provision through mandatory and optional
    training.
  • Recommendation 9
  • The Board of Regents should develop a
    system-wide approach to technology transfer
    issues.

8
Economic Impact
  • Incentives to encourage invention disclosure

9
Economic Impact
  • Direct Support for Salaries and Benefits
  • Two-thirds of total expenditures
  • MSU for FY05 expended 66 million of research
    expenditures on salaries and benefits
  • Graduate and Undergraduate Students
  • 90 of PIs believe research provides
    opportunities for students
  • 52 of PIs had former students benefit from
    employment opportunities
  • MUS Links with the Private Sector
  • Access to facilities and equipment
  • Over 100 licenses

10
Performance Audit
  • Montana University System
  • Research and Development
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com