Title: Ch 7 Trade Regulation
1Ch 7 Trade Regulation Industrial Policies
- The Protective system...is conservative, while
the Free Trade system works destructively. It
breaks up old nationalities and carries
antagonism of proletariat and bourgeoisie to the
uttermost point. In a word, - the Free Trade system hastens the Social
Revolution. - In this revolutionary sense alone, gentlemen,
- I am in favor of Free Trade.
-
- Karl Marx
2Ch 7 Trade Regulations
- Smoot Hawley Act (1930)
- Peak in US protectionism
- Raised tariff rate to 52.8
- Originally intended to help US farmers
- Legislators from farm states put together tariff
package, but needed manufacturing states
support. - Urban states added their own tariffs to bill.
- Evolved into raising tariffs on over 800 items.
- Worlds largest open market in 1920s closed the
door in the 1930s. - Import prices increased 50.
- Many economists believe Smoot Hawley worsened the
depression plunge. - Other nations retaliated.
- US Exports 1929 5.4 billion
- 1932 1.6 billion
- Hoover defeated by FDR in 1932, Smoot Hawley
dismantled immediately. - FDR proposed legislation to liberalize trade in
1934.
3Ch 7 Trade Regulations
- Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act (1934)
- Negotiation authority
- Transferred power to reduce tariffs from Congress
to president. - Allowed him to negotiate reductions bilaterally.
- Tariff reductions could be up to 50.
- Reductions had to be met by trade concessions in
other country. - Item by item basis.
- Generalized reductions
- Further developed most favored nation concept.
- Under MFN, once tariff is negotiated with one
country, deal is automatically extended to all
MFNs. - Two exceptions to MFN clause
- Developing nations can get tariff considerations
not granted to industrialized. - Nations in regional trading arrangements (ie,
NAFTA) can treat member nations differently than
nonmembers. - Between 1934 and 1947, agreements were reached
with 29 nations, tariffs reduced 25.
4Ch 7 Trade Regulations
- Bilateral negotiations had problems
- Under MFN principle, once Country A had
negotiated with Country B, reductions were
automatically extended to other MFNs. When
Country A goes to negotiate with Country C,
theres nothing to offer because tariffs are
already reduced. - All negotiations were revolving around tariffs,
but nations were using other non-tariff trade
barriers not covered in MFN negotiations. - Nations enjoyed the prosperity and healthier
economies they were seeing from trade reductions,
wanted more. But they needed another way.
5Ch 7 Trade Regulations
- General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (1947)
- Set of bilateral agreements among contracted
member nations to decrease trade barriers and
place all nations on equal footing in trade
relationships. - Began with 18 members in 1947, reducing tariffs
on over 45,000 goods. - Primarily, GATT established rules of conduct of
international trade that still exist in form of
World Trade Organization.
6Ch 7 Trade Regulations
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
(1947) Principles
- Trade to be conducted in a non-discriminatory
manner. - Trade policies apply to all nations.
- MFN status extended to all GATT members.
- Did not eliminate nations ability to
discriminate. Still permitted under preferential
trading arrangements.
- Banned use of quantitative restrictions (quotas)
- Unless nation has balance of payments problems.
- Developing nations have more freedom to use
quotas. - Domestic agricultural support programs are okay.
- Set up framework for conflict resolution
- No enforcement power.
- Provided forum for nations to come together. If
nations talk, they may not fight.
7Ch 7 Trade Regulations
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
(1947) From 1947 to 1961, GATT held five rounds
of negotiations with fairly substantial
reductions.
- Kennedy Round (1964-1967)
- Negotiations shifted from item-by-item to
across-the-board. - Tariffs reduced 35 on 60,000 items.
- Discussed dealing with NTBs and agricultural
products (didnt DO it, just talked about it).
8Ch 7 Trade Regulations
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
(1947) From 1947 to 1961, GATT held five rounds
of negotiations with fairly substantial
reductions.
- Tokyo Round (1973-1979)
- Addressed non-tariff barriers.
- Cut tariffs on manufactured goods by 40.
- Tariff on finished goods cut more than raw
materials (decreased degree of tariff escalation).
- Uruguay Round (1986-1993)
- By mid 80s, many GATT rules were being violated.
- Discussed major growth sectors of trade
(services, intellectual property) that had not
been addressed. - Established World Health organization
9Ch 7 Trade Regulations
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
(1947) From 1947 to 1961, GATT held five rounds
of negotiations with fairly substantial
reductions.
- Doha Round (2001- present)
- Focus on more fair system of trade for developing
countries. - Divide between the rich, developed countries, and
the major developing countries (represented by
the G20 developing nations). - Agricultural protectionism, especially with
Europe's Common Agricultural Policy, is the most
significant issue upon which agreement has been
hardest to negotiate.
10Ch 7 Trade Regulations
World Trade Organization (WTO) 1/1/95
- Headquartered in Geneva.
- Maintains GATT principles, resolves disputes.
- Every nation has one vote, none more powerful
than any other. - Wider scope than GATT, including intellectual
property, services, investment. - Administers tariff agreements.
- Serves as watchdog, some enforcement power.
11Ch 7 Trade Regulations
WTO and the Environment Trade Liberalization
Harms the Environment
- Arguments against WTO trade policy
- Industry will shift production to countries with
lowest standards, especially heavily polluting
industries. - Trade should be opposed in industries that
encourage certain practices some find socially
inappropriate or unacceptable, i.e. dolphins in
fishing nets, child labor, etc. - Trade liberalization encourages trade in products
creating global pollution, i.e. free trade in
lumber promotes trade in forestry products,
harming forests.
12Ch 7 Trade Regulations
WTO and the Environment Trade Liberalization
Harms the Environment
- Arguments for WTO trade policy
- Trade stimulates economic growth. More
prosperous nations have higher demands for
cleaner environments. As people get richer, they
want a cleaner environment. - Trade and growth can encourage development and
trade of environment-friendly production
processes. - Costs of pollution control are a small fraction
of total costs, so they probably wont cause firm
relocation.
13Ch 7 Trade Regulations
Trade Remedy Laws Designed to ensure fair
trading environments.
- Escape Clause
- Way to provide relief to companies hurt by trade.
- Allows president (or his trade representative) to
modify trade concessions that are granted to
foreign countries, and to impose restrictions on
import of a product that causes harm or threatens
to cause harm to US manufacturer of similar
product. - Temporary supposed to be for 5 years only.
- Usually initiated by affected industry.
- Industry petitions US government, who
investigates claim and makes recommendation to
president.
14Ch 7 Trade Regulations
Trade Remedy Laws Escape Clause
- Must find 3 things to be true
- Increasing imports, actual or relative to US
production. - Domestic industry is being seriously injured or
threatened. - Imports are a substantial cause of the injury.
- If all three are true, International Trade
Commission (ITC) will recommend a remedy,
typically a countervailing (offset) duty.
15Ch 7 Trade Regulations
Trade Remedy Laws Section 301 Unfair Trading
Practices (1970s)
- Part of Trade Act of 1974
- Directs US trade rep (USTR) to overtly eliminate
unfair trade practices, with ultimate step being
change your ways or well keep your goods out of
the US. - In 1988, Section 301 strengthened USTRs power,
called Super 301. - USTR can now self-initiate investigations
(industry had to ask before). - Under Super 301, USTR can name nations as unfair
traders, subject to retaliatory restrictions.
16Ch 7 Trade Regulations
Economic Sanctions
- Used to preserve national security, protect human
rights, and combat international terrorism. - Restriction of exports for domestic and foreign
policy objectives. - Government mandated limitations on customary
trade. - Imposing nations hope to impair economic
capabilities of target nation so they will give
in to objectives. - Two types
- Trade (any nation can do)
- Stop exporting to target, or set zero quota on
imports. - Financial (must be strong to do)
- Limit lending or aid to target
17Ch 7 Trade Regulations
18Ch 7 Trade Regulations
Economic Sanctions
- Determinants of success
- Number of nations imposing sanctions
- Multilateral sanctions apply more pressure
- Enhances political legitimacy of the effort
- Degree of political and economic ties between
target and imposing nation - Extent of political opposition in target
- Cultural factors in target
- Citizens may identify with views of imposing
nation and support their efforts.