Title: Sustainable Development
1Sustainable Development
2Policy for Sustainable Development
- The United Nations Conference on the Human
Environment - 1st meeting of representatives from 113 countries
(500 NGOs), focusing on environmental issues
(Stockholm, 1972) - The Brundtland Report - 1987 ("Our Common
Future") - A definition for sustainable development"developm
ent that meets the need of the present without
compromising the ability of future generations to
meet their own needs - The Rio-Earth Summit - 1992
- 175 countries and gt1500 NGOs (bio-diversity,
climate change, sustainable forest management) - The Johannesburg Summit - 2002
- climate change, drinking water, and renewable
energy
3Malthus-Model (Malthus 1766-1834)
What are the policy implications?What would you
change in the modell?
4Meadows 1992
5Growth and Sustainability
- The Kuznets Curve/Hypothesis (1955)
- At low levels of development both the quantity
and intensity of environmental degradation is
limited to the impacts of subsistence economic
activity on the resource base and to limited
quantities of biodegradable waste. As economic
development accelerates with the intensification
of agriculture and other resource extraction and
the takeoff begin to exceed the rates of resource
regeneration, and waste generation increases in
quantity and toxicity. At higher levels of
development, structural change towards
information-intensive industries and services,
coupled with increased environmental awareness,
enforcement of environmental regulations, better
technology and higher environmental expenditures,
result in levelling off and gradual decline of
environmental degradation (Panayotou, 1993).
6Economic growth and sustainability
Environmental Impact per unit income
b
k
a
Y2
Y
Y1
0
Income
Quelle Common (1995)
7poltical and economic systems
The 11 Relationship Between GDP and CO2
Emissions Can be Broken
8Example IPAT Model
I environmental impact, measured in vol. or
mass units. P population A per capita income
in money units (e.g. GDP) T technology,
measured in resource demand or emission per
production unit (e.g. t/GDP).
Global CO2- Scenarios
Source UNDP (2001), WRI (2000) PPP
Purchasing Power Parity
9Economy-environment interdependence
4 Functions
e.g., indoor skiing, orswimming
4 environmental. functions 1) life support
services and which hold the functioning system
together 2) resource base (stock or flow) 3)
amenity service base 4) waste sink
e.g., sewage plant
e.g., house insulation
investment
economic activities
Common, 1995
10What should be sustainable?
- Daly (1987) Sustainability requires that all
processes operate only at their steady state
renewable resources. - Pearce et al., (1988) A necessary condition for
sustainable development is the constancy of the
natural capital stock. - Goodland and Ledec (1987) Sustainable
Development is a pattern of 'development' which
optimizes the economic and societal benefits
available in the present without jeopardizing the
likely potential for similar benefits in the
future. - Tietenberg (1984) The sustainability criterion
suggests that, at a minimum, future generations
should be left no worse off than current
generations.
11Concepts of Sustainability
- A sustainable state is one in which
- 1. utility (consumption) is non-declining
through time. - 2. resources are managed so as to maintain
production and consumption opportunities for the
future. - 3. the natural capital stock is non-declining
through time. - 4. resources are managed so as to maintain a
sustainable yield of resources services. - 5. satisfies minimum conditions for ecosystem
resilience through time. - 6. sustainable development is based on
consensus-building and institutional development.
12Consumption Time Paths
CMin minimum level of consumption that society
deems socially and morally acceptable. CSurv
biophysical minimum consumption level (poverty
line)
C(1), C(3), C(5), and C(6) are not
declining. Ranking of C-Paths by a Social Welfare
Function, assuming non-declining
consumption. What about the level of
consumption? How large should be the
non-declining level? Should be the poverty line
culturally or biophysically determined? How about
non-renewable resources and consumption?
13Weak and Strong Sustainability Criteria
- Natural capital (KN) aquifers, soil, biomass,
atmosphere,... - physical capital (KP) equipment, buildings,
infrastructure,... - human capital (KH) embodied skills to enhance
the productive potential - intellectual capital (KI) disembodied skills and
knowledge (books and other cultural constructs
that are transmitted and developed through time
by social learning processes).
14Weak and Strong Sustainability
- Production function with Labour (L), natural
capital (KN) and Human Made capital (KHM) - Strong Sustainability KN is non-declining
- Weak Sustainability the sum of KN KHM is
non-declining - Solow, Hartwick, and many other economist are
weak sustainabilists (how about you?) - substitution between KN and KHM to produce
life-support services and amenity services (e.g.,
indoor skiing)
KHM KH KP KI
15How to measure capital
- how to measure the size of the natural capital
stock? - how to define a single-valued measure of natural
capital stock? - how do we add two lakes and one forest into a
single value for natural capital (e.g., national
income accounting)? - for output of goods and services, an obvious
weight to use is relative prices (e.g. economic
accounts).
16 Norms of social justice in economics
- Question how should be benefits and costs
distributed? - horizontal equity people with equal income are
treated equally. - same net benefits within equal income groups,
different regions, etc. - vertical equity people with unequal income are
treated equally. - same net benefits between unequal income groups
in a progressive or proportional manner (not
regressive).
17 Lorenz Curves
100
income distribution e.g. between urban and rural
regions, or women and men, or lawers, or farmers,
etc.
absolute equality
80
60
income
40
20
absolute inequality
0
40
60
80
100
20
population
18 What about benefits and costs of locally
unwanted/undesirable land uses -LULU)
- Facility owner try to max. net benefits
- close to source of waste
- cheap land
- minimum future liability (minimize risk)
- Recipient community try to max. net benefits
- maximize compensation payments
- maximize safety
- Why do LULUs end up in low-income communities
- land is cheap
- lower compensation
- people want the jobs.
efficiency?
equity?
19Sustainability and Policy
- !!incentives - information - irreversibility!!
- an efficient outcome is a situation where no
individual can be made better off except at the
cost of making some other individual(s) worse off
(fairness?) - sustainable development will be enhanced if
pollution flows are reduced, recycling is
encouraged, more attention is given to the
regulation, management, and disposal of waste gt
information! - !!if all resource-use decisions were reversible,
then much of the force behind sustainability
arguments would be lost!!
20Extreme events