STATISTICS REVIEW - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

STATISTICS REVIEW

Description:

... found that the more pregnancies a woman had, the lower her rate of breast ... Receiver Operating Curves (R.O.C.)- 1 - Specificity. Sensitivity. STATISTICS ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:117
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: nya4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: STATISTICS REVIEW


1
STATISTICS REVIEW
  • Robert V. Wetz, M.D.
  • Associate Director of Medicine
  • Department of Medicine
  • Staten Island University Hospital

2
DATA COLLECTION
  • Accuracy- the ability of a measurement to be
    correct, on the average. It correctly measures
    what its supposed to measure.
  • Precision- (reproducibility, reliability) the
    ability of the measurement to give the same
    results on repeated testing.

3
DATA COLLECTION
  • Validity-
  • Internal results are applicable to the study
    population
  • External results can be extrapolated to the
    general population.
  • Responsiveness- can the instrument detect small
    but clinically significant changes.

4
DATA COLLECTION
  • Incidence- number of NEW cases in a population at
    risk.
  • Prevalence- number of EXISTING cases in a defined
    population
  • At point in time point prevalence
  • Over a period of time period prevalence
  • Prevalence incidence x duration
  • Cumulative incidence number of new cases over a
    period of time.
  • Prevalence Now Cumulative incidence
    cured/expired people.

5
DATA COLLECTION
  • Mean
  • Median
  • Range
  • Standard Deviation (SD) the spread from the
    mean.
  • 1 SD about the middle 68 of data
  • 2 SD about the middle 95 of data

6
DATA COLLECTION
  • 95 Confidence Intervals (CI) 1.96 SE from the
    mean. SE SD/?n
  • The larger the study population (n) the SMALLER
    the confidence intervals. The smaller the CI,
    the more likely the result is the true result.
  • Null hypothesis results are by chance
  • Alternate hypothesis results are real
  • Reject the null hypothesis if the results are
    statistically significant.

7
TYPES OF DATA
  • Nominal- naming of categorical variables that
    have no measurement.
  • Example- Skin Color
  • Yellow 1
  • Black 2
  • White 3
  • Red 4

8
TYPES OF DATA
  • Dichotomous- split into two.
  • Examples-
  • 1 living 2 dead
  • 1 normal skin color 2 abnormal skin color
  • 1 well 2 sick

9
TYPES OF DATA
  • Ordinal- variables that are able to be put in
    order but are NOT continuous.
  • Example-
  • Edema 1, 2, 3, 4
  • Murmurs I/VI to VI/VI
  • Resp. Distress absent, mild, mod., severe

10
TYPES OF DATA
  • Continuous- variables that a measured on a
    continuous scale.
  • Example-
  • Weight
  • Height
  • Blood Pressure
  • Serum glucose level

11
TYPES OF DATA
  • Continuous Scales can be of two types
  • Interval- distance between variables are equal
    but the zero point is arbitrary and not a true
    zero. Ex. Fahrenheit scale.
  • Ratio- as above but zero is the true zero
    point.
  • Example-
  • Weight 0 is the absence of weight
  • Kelvin 0 is the absence of heat
  • Blood pressure 0 is no pressure

12
TYPES OF STUDIES
  • Case-control-
  • Strengths- useful for rare conditions relatively
    inexpensive short duration yields odds ratio
  • Weaknesses- potential sampling bias limited to
    one-outcome variable does NOT yield prevalence,
    incidence or relative risk

13
TYPES OF STUDIES
  • Cross-sectional-
  • Strengths- short duration can study several
    outcomes controls subject selection controls
    measurements yields prevalence
  • Weaknesses- does not establish cause unmeasured
    diff. between groups

14
TYPES OF STUDIES
  • Cohort-
  • Strengths- establishes sequence of events avoids
    bias in measuring predictors yields incidence,
    relative risk, and excess risk
  • Weaknesses- relatively expensive long duration
    requires large sample size not useful for rare
    outcomes

15
TYPES OF STUDIES
  • Prospective Cohort- take a group of people
    (cohort), identify risk factors (variables) and
    follow into the future for outcomes.
  • Retrospective Cohort- take a group of people
    (cohort) from the past, identify risk factors
    (variables) and collect outcome data from the
    present time.

16
TYPES OF STUDIES
  • Meta-analysis- pooled data from different
    studies.
  • Strengths- increases statistical power for
    outcomes helpful when studies disagree
  • Weaknesses- quality of secondary data study
    differences

17
TYPES OF STUDIES
  • Experimental (Randomized Control)-
  • Strengths- strongest evidence for cause and
    effect able to mask
  • Weaknesses- expensive long duration not
    suitable for many questions not useful for rare
    outcomes limited generalizability (external
    validity)

18
TYPES OF ERROR
  • Types of Bias-
  • Measurement bias-
  • Examples- weighing people with clothes on or
    using lab data from different labs
  • Selection bias- happens if patients are allowed
    to choose intervention or placebo group.
  • Sickest patients will enter trials more often and
    potentially worsen the results.

19
TYPES OF ERROR
  • Types of Bias-
  • Recall bias- people who had an adverse event are
    more likely to recall past info. because they
    think about it more.
  • Example- A mother of a child born with an anomaly
    is more likely to remember different exposures or
    pregnancy problems than a mother of a normal
    child.

20
TYPES OF ERROR
  • Types of Bias (in cross-sectional study)-
  • Late-look bias- fewer pts. with severe dz.
    because they died before detection.(Neyman)
  • Length bias- people with less aggressive dz. are
    selected because they live longer.
  • Lead-time bias- find dz. in earlier stage by
    screening asymptomatic pts., regardless of
    aggressiveness. Makes pts. seem like theyre
    living longer with their disease.

21
TYPES OF ERROR
  • Confounding- confusion of 2 supposedly causal
    variables, so that the part or all of the
    purported effect of one variable is actually due
    to the other variable.
  • Example- initially it was found that the more
    pregnancies a woman had, the lower her rate of
    breast cancer. Later it was found that early age
    of pregnancy was protective and NOT the number of
    pregnancies.

22
TYPES OF ERROR
  • Type 1 report a significance and there is not
    one.
  • Type 2 report no significance and there is one.
  • To avoid Type 1 error decrease the p value,
    leaving less to chance.
  • To avoid Type 2 error increase the population
    size. (see power)

23
Powering a study
  • To interpret a p value, one needs to look at the
    power of a study.
  • Need to calculate the number of patients to
    enroll prior to starting the study.
  • Usually power of 80 or better (80 chance to
    detect a significance).
  • What can be said about a calculated p value when
    the n is very small or large?

24
STATISTICS
  • p value the chance that findings happened by
    chance. ? 0.05 (5) is considered significant.
  • Let the statistician pick the correct test to
    find the p value.

25
STATISTICS
26
Assessing Risk
27
Assessing Risk
  • Relative Risk Ratio a/(ab) c/(cd)
  • (cohort study, prospective)
  • Odds Ratio a/b c/d
  • (case-control)
  • Odds ratio tends to overestimates the risk

28
STATISTICS
  • Relative Risk Graph- (or odds ratio)

1
lt 1
gt 1
x
x
x
x
x
x
29
STATISTICS
  • Lets say a study was done on HRT and the
    incidence of breast cancer. The study had three
    arms and the relative risk and confidence
    intervals were

30
STATISTICS
  • Lets say a study was done on HRT and the
    incidence of breast cancer. The study had three
    arms and the relative risk and confidence
    intervals were
  • What if the p value for the difference between
    the estrogen alone and est. prog. groups was
    0.001 or 0.07 or 0.40?

31
STATISTICS
  • Likelihood Ratio sens./1-spec.
  • It is the power of a test to rule in
  • It is the likelihood of having the disease if the
    test is
  • Likelihood Ratio - 1-sens./spec.
  • It is the power of a test to rule out
  • It is the likelihood of having the disease if the
    test is -

32
About Likelihood Ratios
33
About Likelihood Ratios
  • LR of 2, 5, 10 increases probability by 15,
    30, 45 respectively
  • LR of 0.5, 0.2, 0.1 decreases probablity by
    15, -30, -45 respectively

34
Using LR to Affect Probability
  • Convert prevalence or pretest prob to odds
  • Pretest odds pretest prob/(1 - pretest prob)
  • Posttest odds pretest odds x LR
  • Posttest Prob posttest odds/(posttest odds 1)

35
Using LR to Affect Probability
  • Pretest prob 36 and LR 8
  • Pre odds 0.36/(1-0.36) 0.56
  • Post odds 0.56 x 8 4.5
  • Post Prob 4.5/(14.5) 0.82 or 82

36
STATISTICS
  • Receiver Operating Curves (R.O.C.)-

Sensitivity
1 - Specificity
37
STATISTICS
  • Sensitivity Specificity-
  • SpIn a Specific test rules a disease in.
  • SnOut a Sensitive test rules a disease out.
  • A screening test should be sensitive.
  • A confirmatory test should be specific.

38
STATISTICS
  • Bayes Theorem is the impact on a test result by
    the patients PRE-test probability of having the
    disease. In basic form, it is merely the formula
    for positive predictive value.

39
STATISTICS
  • Sensitivity TP / (TP FN)
  • Specificity TN / (TN FP)
  • Pos. Pred. Value TP / (TP FP)
  • Neg. Pred. Value TN / (TN FN)

40
STATISTICS
  • The 2x2 Table- (make it 3x3)

DISEASE
DISEASE -
TOTALS
TEST
TEST -
TOTALS
41
STATISTICS
  • A new rapid throat culture for strep has been
    developed. It has a sensitivity of 90 and a
    specificity of 80. The prevalence of strep
    pharyngitis in your population is 2. What is
    the likelihood that a positive test result means
    you have strep pharyngitis?
  • Use 2x2 table, find Pos. Pred. Value

42
STATISTICS
  • A new rapid throat culture for strep has been
    developed. It has a sensitivity of 90 and a
    specificity of 80. The prevalence of strep
    pharyngitis in your population is 20. What is
    the likelihood that a positive test result means
    you have strep pharyngitis?
  • Use 2x2 table, find Pos. Pred. Value

43
STATISTICS
  • In other words, for the boards
  • Pos. Pred. Value Post-test Probability
  • Prevalence Pre-test Probability
  • Incidence Absolute Risk

44
Analyzing a Diagnostic Test
100 Sensitivity Cut Point
100 Specificity Cut Point
Disease
No Disease
Sensitivity
Specificity
Negative
Positive
Treatment Decision
Typical Testing Cut Point
False -
False
45
STATISTICS
  • Relative Risk Reduction
  • Placebo Treatment
  • Placebo
  • Absolute Risk Reduction Placebo Tx
  • Number Needed to Treat 1/ARR

46
STATISTICS
  • A new study shows that pill z lowered the risk
    of stroke from 20 in the control (placebo) group
    to 10 in the treatment group. What are the RRR,
    ARR and NNT?
  • RRR 20 10/20 50
  • ARR 20 10 10
  • NNT 1/.10 10

47
STATISTICS
  • A new study shows that pill z lowered the risk
    of stroke from 2 in the control (placebo) group
    to 1 in the treatment group. What are the RRR,
    ARR and NNT?
  • RRR 2 1/2 50
  • ARR 2 1 1
  • NNT 1/.01 100
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com