Title: The Classical LongRun Model
1- Chapter 7
- The Classical Long-Run Model
2The Classical Long-Run Model
- Economists sometimes disagree with each other
- Actually much more agreement exists among
economists than there appears to be - Once distinction between long-run and short-run
becomes clear - Many apparent disagreements among macroeconomists
dissolve - If no time horizon is specified, however, an
economist is likely to focus on horizon he or she
feels is most important - Something about which economists sometimes do
disagree
3The Classical Long-Run Model
- Ideally, we would like our economy to do well in
both long-run and short-run - Unfortunately, there is often a trade-off between
these two goals - Doing better in short-run can require some
sacrifice of long-run goals, and vice versa - Polices that can help us smooth out economic
fluctuations may prove harmful to growth in the
long-run - While policies that promise a high rate of growth
might require us to put up with more severe
fluctuations in short-run
4Macroeconomic Models Classical Verses Keynesian
- Classical model, developed by economists in 19th
and early 20th centuries, was an attempt to
explain a key observation about economy - If we think in terms of decades rather than years
or quarters, business cycle fades in significance
- In the classical view, this behavior is no
accident - An important group of macroeconomists continues
to believe that classical model is useful even in
shorter run - In 1936, in midst of Great Depression, British
economist John Maynard Keynes offered an
explanation for economys poor performance
5Macroeconomic Models Classical Verses Keynesian
- Keynesian ideas became increasingly popular in
universities and government agencies during 1940s
and 1950s - In recent decades there has been an active
counterrevolution against Keyness approach to
understanding the macroeconomy - While Keyness ideas and their further
development help us understand economic
fluctuationsmovements in output around its
long-run trend - Classical model has proven more useful in
explaining the long-run trend itself
6Assumptions of the Classical Model
- All models begin with assumptions about the world
- One assumption in classical view that goes beyond
mere simplification - Markets clear
- Price in every market will adjust until quantity
supplied and quantity demanded are equal
7Assumptions of the Classical Model
- Well use classical model to answer a variety of
important questions about economy in long-run,
such as - How is total employment determined?
- How much output will we produce?
- What role does total spending play in the
economy? - What happens when things change?
8How Much Output Will We Produce?
- How can we disentangle web of economic
interactions we see around us? - Decide which market or markets best suit the
problem being analyzed, and - Identify buyers and sellers
- Identify type of environment in which they trade
- But which market should we start with?
- Logical start is market for resources
- Labor, land and natural resources, capital and
entrepreneurship - Well concentrate our attention on labor
- Our question is
- How many workers will be employed in the economy?
9Figure 1 The Labor Market
LS
B
A
E
H
J
10
Excess Demand for Labor
LD
100 million Full Employment
10The Labor Market
- Labor supply curve slopes upward
- Becauseas wage rate increasesmore and more
individuals are better off working than not
working - Thus, a rise in wage rate increases number of
people who want to workto supply their labor - As wage rate increases each firm will find
thatto maximize profitit should employ fewer
workers than before - When all firms behave this way together a rise in
wage rate will decrease quantity of labor
demanded - This is why economys labor demand curve slopes
downward - In classical view, economy achieves full
employment on its own
11Determining the Economys Output
- Accordingly, our classical analysis of economy is
divided into two separate questions - What would be the long-run equilibrium of the
economy if there were a constant state of
technology - And if quantities of all resources besides labor
were fixed? - What happens to this long-run equilibrium when
technology and quantities of other resources
change?
12The Production Function
- Relationship between total employment and total
production in the economy - Given by economys aggregate production function
- Shows total output economy can produce with
different quantities of labor - Given constant amounts of other resources and
current state of technology - In classical, long-run view economy reaches its
potential output automatically - An important conclusion of classical model and an
important characteristic of the economy in
long-run - Output tends toward its potential,
full-employment level on its own, with no need
for government to steer the economy toward it
13Figure 2 Output Determination in the Classical
Model
LS
15
LD
100 million
Aggregate Production Function
7 Trillion Full Employment Output
100 million
14Total Spending in a Very Simple Economy
- Imagine a world with just two types of economic
units - Households and business firms
- Circular Flow
- A diagram that shows how goods, resources, and
dollar payments flow between households and firms - In a simple economy with just households and
firms in which households spend all of their
income - Total spending must be equal to total output
- Known as Says Law
15Figure 3 The Circular Flow
Goods and Services Demanded
Resources Supplied
Total Consumption Spending
Total Income
Total Revenue of Firms
Total Factor Payments
Goods and Services Supplied
Resources Demanded
16Total Spending in a Very Simple Economy
- Says Law named after classical economist Jean
Baptiste Say (1767-1832), who popularized the
idea - In Says own words
- A product is no sooner created than it, from
that instant, affords a market for other products
to the full extent of its own valueThus, the
mere circumstance of the creation of one product
immediately opens a vent for other products - Says law states that by producing goods and
services - Firms create a total demand for goods and
services equal to what they have produced or - Supply creates its own demand
17Some New Macroeconomic Variables
- Planned investment spending (IP) over a period of
time is total investment spending (I) minus
change in inventories over the period - IP I ? inventories
- Net taxes (T) are total government tax revenue
minus government transfer payments - T total tax revenue transfers
- Household saving (S)
- Its often useful to arrive at household saving
in two steps - Determine how much income household sector has
left after payment of net taxes - Household sectors disposable income
- Disposable Income Total Income Net Taxes
- Part that is not spent is defined as saving (S)
- S Disposable Income C
- Total Spending
- Total spending is sum of purchases made by
household sector (C), business sector (IP), and
government sector (G) - Total spending C IP G
18Some New Macroeconomic Variables
- Saving and net taxes are called leakages out of
spending - Amount of income that households receive, but do
not spend - There are also injectionsspending from sources
other than households - A governments purchases of goods and services
- Planned investment spending (IP)
- Total spending will equal total output if and
only if total leakages in the economy are equal
to total injections - Only if sum of saving and net taxes is equal to
sum of planned investment spending and government
purchases
19The Classical Model A Summary
- Began with a critical assumption
- All markets clear
- In classical model, government neednt worry
about employment - Economy will achieve full employment on its own
- In classical model, government neednt worry
about total spending - Economy will generate just enough spending on its
own to buy output that a fully employed labor
force produces
20Using the Theory Fiscal Policy in the Classical
Model
- Could government increase economys total
employment and total output by raising total
spending? - Two ideas for increasing spending come to mind
- Government could simply purchase more output
itself - More goods, like tanks and police cars, or more
services, like those provided by high school
teachers and judges - Government could cut net taxes, letting
households keep more of their income - So they would spend more on food, clothing,
furniture, new cars, and so on - Fiscal policy is a change in government purchases
or in net taxes - Designed to change total spending in the economy
and thereby influence levels of employment and
output - Idea behind fiscal policy sounds sensible enough
- But does it work?
- Not if economy behaves according to classical
model
21Using the Theory Fiscal Policy With A Budget
Deficit
- What would happen if the government which is
running a deficitattempted to increase
employment and output by increasing government
purchases - Crowding out is a decline in one sectors
spending caused by an increase in some other
sectors spending - In classical model a rise in government purchases
completely crowds out private sector spending so
total spending remains unchanged - In classical model, an increase in government
purchases has no impact on total spending and no
impact on total output or total employment - Opposite sequence of events would happen if
government purchases decreased - Total spending and total output would remain
unchanged
22- Chapter 8
- Economic Growth and Rising Living Standards
23The Importance of Growth
- Why should we be concerned about economic growth?
- When output grows faster than population, GDP per
capita will rise - When output grows more slowly than population,
average standard of living will fall - Measuring standard of living by GDP per capita
may seem limiting - Still, many aspects of our quality of life are
counted in GDP such as - Food, housing, medical care, education,
transportation services, and movies and video
games - Economic growth is especially important in
countries with income levels far below those of
Europe, Japan, and United States - Other than emigration, economic growth is their
only hope - Growth is a high priority in prosperous nations,
too - When output per capita is growing, its at least
possible for everyone to enjoy an increase in
material well-being without having to cut back
24The Importance of Growth
- When output per capita stagnates, material gains
become a fight over a fixed pie - The more purchasing power my neighbor has, the
less is left for me - In 1950s and 1960s, economic growth in wealthier
nations seemed to be taking care of itself - All of that changed starting in 1970s
- Economic growth became a national and
international preoccupation - Over most of postwar period, output in more
prosperous industrialized countries grew by 2 or
3 per year - Beginning in mid-1970s, all of these nations saw
their growth rates slip - In late 1990s and early 2000s, only United States
and United Kingdom returned to their previous
high rates of growth - Other industrialized countries continued to grow
more slowly than their historical averages - Seemingly small differences in growth rates
matter a great deal
25What Makes Economies Grow?
- Useful way to start thinking about long-run
growth - Look at what determines our potential GDP in any
given period - Real GDP depends on
- Amount of output average worker can produce in an
hour - Number of hours average worker spends at the job
- Fraction of population that wants to work
- Size of population
- Amount of output the average worker produces in
an hour is called labor productivity, or
productivity - Measured by taking total output (real GDP) of
economy over a period of time and dividing by
total number of hours that everyone worked during
the period to produce that output - Productivity Output per hour Total output
Total hours worked
26What Makes Economies Grow?
- Hours of the average worker can be found by
dividing total hours worked over a period by
total employment, number of people who worked
during the period - Average Hours Total hours worked Labor Force
- Fraction of population working is labor force
participation rate (LFPR) - Found by dividing labor force (all those who want
to work) by population - LFPR Labor Force Population
27Economic Growth and Living Standards
- Ultimately, growth in potential output does not
by itself account for a rise in living standards - What matters for a rising standard of living is
real GDP per capita - Whichover long-runwill equal our potential
output divided by population - Total output Productivity x Average Hours x
LFPR x Population - If we divide both sides by the population, we get
- Total output Population Productivity x
Average Hours x LFPR - In terms of percentage growth rates
- ? Output per person ? Productivity ?
Average hours ? LFPR - Notice that population drops out of the equation
- Only way to raise living standards is to increase
productivity, average hours, or labor force
participation rate
28Economic Growth and Living Standards
- In most developed countries, average hours are
slowly decreasing, not increasing - ? Output per person ? productivity ?
LFPR - To explain why U.S.or any developed countryhas
enjoyed continual rises in living standards over
long periods of time - Must look to growth in productivity and growth in
labor force participation rate
29Figure 1 An Increase in Labor Supply
A
15
B
12
LD
100
120
B
8 trillion
7 trillion
A
100
120
30Figure 2 An Increase in Labor Demand
LS
B
17
15
A
100
120
31Figure 3 The U.S. Labor Market Over A Century
W2
B
W1
A
L1
L2
32How To Increase Employment and the LFPR
- One set of policies to increase employment
focuses on changing labor supply - An often-proposed example of this type of policy
is a decrease in income tax rates - Tax cut would be just what was needed to get you
to seek work - When we extend your reaction to population as a
whole - Can see that a cut in income tax rate can
convince more people to seek jobs at any given
wage - Shifting labor supply curve rightward
- Many American workers must pay combined federal,
state, and local taxes of more than 40 out of
each additional dollar they earn - This may be discouraging work effort in United
States - In addition to tax rate changes, some economists
have advocated changes in government transfer
programs to speed growth in employment - Redesigning these programs might stimulate growth
in labor supply - This reasoning was an important motive behind the
sweeping reforms in U.S. welfare system in August
1996
33How To Increase Employment and the LFPR
- A cut in tax rates increases reward for working
- While a cut in benefits to the needy increases
hardship of not working - Either policy can cause a greater rightward shift
in the economys labor supply curve than would
otherwise occur and create growth in labor force
participation and output - Government policies can also affect labor demand
curve - Government policies that help increase skills of
the workforce or that subsidize employment more
directly shift the economys labor demand curve
to the right - Increasing employment and output
34Employment Growth LFPR vs. Population
- Increases in employment have been an important
source of economic growth in United States and
many other countries - Has been almost entirely due to increases in
population, rather than increases in labor force
participation - Labor force participation rate did account for
growth in living standards during 1970s and 1980s
as womenespecially married womenentered labor
force at much higher rates than previously - But by 1990, this source of growth in living
standards was exhausted - LFPR did not rise during 1990s and is not
projected to rise in near future - Efforts to increase living standards by raising
LFPR have two serious drawbacks - LFPR cannot create rapid growth in living
standards indefinitely, because there is a
logical upper limit of 100 - In developed economies, raising LFPR means that
people who currently do not want jobs must change
their minds and want to work
35Growth in Productivity
- We eliminated variables that could not explain
rising living standards over long-run - Ruled out population growth
- Based on logic of equation for total output per
person - Ruled out growth in average hours
- Because of upper limit on this variables growth
and high opportunity cost paid to raise hours per
worker when most of labor force is already
working full-time - Ruled out increases in labor force participation
- At least as a source of continual, rapid economic
growth - Only one variable remains
- Productivity
- Can we do anything to make productivity grow even
faster?
36Figure 4 Capital Accumulation and Labor
Productivity
D
8 trillion
7 trillion
A
100
37Growth in the Capital Stock
- One key to productivity growth is growth in
nations capital stock - Amount of capital available for average worker
- With more capital a given number of workers can
produce more output than before - Since same number of workers are working same
number of hours, but producing more output than
before, productivity rises - Growth in capital stock will increase
productivity as long as it increases amount of
capital per worker - If capital stock grows faster than labor force
then capital per worker will rise - Labor productivity will increase along with it
- But if capital stock grows more slowly than labor
force, then capital per worker will fall - Labor productivity will fall as well
38Investment and the Capital Stock
- An increase in capital stock plays a central role
in economists thinking about growth - Contributes to a rise in labor productivity and
helps to raise living standards - A stock variable measures a quantity at a moment
in time - Capital stock is a measure of total plant and
equipment in economy at any moment - Planned investment is a flow variable
- Measures a process that takes place over a period
of time - As long as investment is greater than
depreciation, total stock of capital will rise - The greater the flow of investment, the faster
will be the rise in capital stock
39Targeting Businesses Increasing the Incentive
to Invest
- One kind of policy to increase investment targets
the business sector itself - With goal of increasing planned investment
spending - Corporate profits tax
- Tax on profits earned by corporations
- Investment tax credit
- A reduction in taxes for firms that invest in
certain favored types of capital - Reducing business taxes or providing specific
investment incentives can shift the investment
curve rightward - Speeding growth in physical capital
- Increasing growth rate of living standards
40Targeting Households Increasing the Incentive
to Save
- While firms make decisions to purchase new
capital, it is largely households that supply
firms with funds, via personal saving - An increase in investment spending can originate
in household sector, through an increase in
desire to save - If households decide to save more of their
incomes at any given interest rate - Supply of funds curve will shift rightward
- What might cause households to increase their
saving? - Greater uncertainty about economic future
- Increase in life expectancy
- Anticipation of an earlier retirement
- Change in tastes toward big-ticket items
- Change in attitude about saving
- Any of these changesif they occurred in many
households simultaneouslywould shift saving
curve to the right - But government policy can increase household
saving as well - One often-proposed idea is to decrease capital
gains tax
41Targeting Households Increasing the Incentive
to Save
- Another frequently proposed measure is to switch
from current U.S. income tax - Taxes all income whether it is spent or saved
- To a consumption tax
- Would tax only the income that households spend
- Another proposal to increase household saving is
to restructure U.S. Social Security system - Provides support for retired workers who have
contributed funds to system during their working
years - Government can alter tax and transfer system to
increase incentives for saving - If successful, these policies would
- Make more funds available for investment
- Speed growth in capital stock
- Speed rise in living standards
42Shrinking the Governments Budget
- A final pro-investment measure is directed at
government sector itself - A decrease in government purchases results in
- Raising consumption and investment
- Link between government budget, interest rate,
and investment spending is major reason why U.S.
government, and governments around the world, try
to reduce and, if possible, eliminate budget
deficits - Shrinking deficit or rising surplus tends to
reduce interest rates and increase investment - Speeding growth in capital stock
- In 1990s, Congress set strict limits on growth of
government spending - Budget deficit began shrinking
43Technological Change
- Another source of growth is technological change
- Invention or discovery of new inputs, new
outputs, or new methods of production - New technology affects economy in much the same
way as do increases in capital stock - Shifts production function upward
- Since it enables any given number of workers to
produce more output - In many cases, new technology requires
acquisition of physical and human capital before
it can be used - In some instances, however, a new technology can
be used without any additional equipment or
training - As when a factory manager discovers a more
efficient way to organize workers on the factory
floor - The faster the rate of technological change
- The greater the growth rate of productivity, and
- The faster the rise in living standards
44The Cost of Economic Growth
- Why dont all nations pursue these policies and
push their rates of economic growth to the
maximum? - Promoting economic growth involves unavoidable
trade offs - Requires some groups, or nation as a whole, to
give up something else that is valued - In order to decide how fast we want our economy
to grow we must consider growths costs as well
as benefits - One of the most important things you will learn
in your introductory economics course is that
there are no costless solutions to societys
problems - What are the costs of growth?
45Consumption Costs
- Any pro-growth policy that works by increasing
investmentprivate or government, in physical
capital, human capital, or RDrequires a
sacrifice of current consumption spending - Role of this trade-off in economic growth can be
clearly seen with production possibilities
frontier (PPF) - Greater investment in physical capital, human
capital, or RD will lead to faster economic
growth and higher living standards in the future - But we will have fewer consumer goods to enjoy in
the present
46Figure 8 Consumption, Investment, and Economic
Growth
K
A
C
47Opportunity Costs of Workers Time
- Living standards will also rise if a greater
fraction of population works or if those who
already have jobs begin working longer hours - But this increase in living standards comes at a
cost - Decrease in time spent in nonmarket activities
- Thus, when economic growth comes about from
increases in the labor force participation rate
(or in average hours), we face a trade-off - Can enjoy higher incomes and more goods and
services - Will have less time to do things other than work
in the market
48Figure 9 LDC Growth and Living Standards
49Figure 10 Growth Options for LDCs