Political Heresy: Sedition in the United States Since 1917 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Political Heresy: Sedition in the United States Since 1917

Description:

'The absence of seditious libel as a crime is the true pragmatic test of ... with the Supreme Court's great debate from 1919 (Schenck) to 1969 (Brandenburg) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:65
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: valued53
Learn more at: http://mason.gmu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Political Heresy: Sedition in the United States Since 1917


1
Political Heresy Sedition in the United States
Since 1917
  • Comm454-001
  • Free Speech
  • Ethics
  • Instructor
  • Steve Klein

2
Political Heresy Sedition in the United States
Since 1917
  • Why is the chapter important?
  • The absence of seditious libel as a crime is
    the true pragmatic test of freedom of speech.
  • Harry Klaven Jr.

3
Political Heresy Sedition in the United States
Since 1917
  • This chapter deals with the Supreme Courts great
    debate from 1919 (Schenck) to 1969 (Brandenburg)
    over freedom of expression for political dissent
  • From bad tendency doctrine to a more liberal
    incitement rule

4
Political Heresy Sedition in the United States
Since 1917
  • Turner v. Williams, 1904
  • The first free speech case of the 20th century
  • The tendency of (John Turners) views, not actual
    action or incitement the doctrine of bad
    tendency
  • The doctrine of bad tendency was the predominant
    judicial approach in First Amendment cases up to
    1919

5
Political Heresy Sedition in the United States
Since 1917
  • Our questions
  • How has First Amendment evolved since 1919?
  • The Supreme Court gradually changed its
    philosophy over expression of political dissent
    between what two cases in 1919 and 1969?

6
Political Heresy Sedition in the United States
Since 1917
  • Schenck v. United States (1919)
  • The Court adopts the clear-and-present-danger
    doctrine
  • Yet bad tendency is practiced the Smith Act of
    1940 (prosecutions following WWII)
  • Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
  • The Court decisively rejects bad tendency
  • The Court adopts an incitement test

7
Political Heresy Sedition in the United States
Since 1917
  • 1919-1940
  • Bad tendency doctrine still overrules clear and
    present danger
  • CAPD government must PROVE speech produces a
    danger BOTH clear and present
  • CAPD not used to reverse a conviction prior to
    1940

8
Political Heresy Sedition in the United States
Since 1917
  • Yates v. United States (1957)
  • Moves away from bad tendency and toward clear and
    present danger

9
Political Heresy Sedition in the United States
Since 1917
  • Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
  • Supreme Court decisively rejects bad tendency and
    adopts an incitement test (before
    speech/expression can be suppressed, the
    government must prove incitement)

10
Political Heresy Sedition in the United States
Since 1917
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com