Environmental Politics: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Environmental Politics:

Description:

'Soft' politics vs. 'hard' politics (security studies, IPE) interest since 1970 ... Affect political debate and public perceptions but also science and economics ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:120
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: norr2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Environmental Politics:


1
  • Environmental Politics
  • Tragedy of the Commons and Collective Goods

2
IR Environmental Politics
  • Soft politics vs. hard politics (security
    studies, IPE) interest since 1970-1980s
  • Process of international environmental
    negotiations since first earth Summit
    Stockholm, 1972
  • Role of non-state actors

3
International Environmental Negotiations
  • Many actors with many roles
  • Asymmetry of power
  • Public opinions
  • Common interests for common solution
  • Negotiated agreement can be perceived as more
    constraining than advantageous

4
Non Governmental Organizations
  • Norm creation
  • Environmental NGOs
  • Industry interests
  • Affect political debate and public perceptions
    but also science and economics

5
Tragedy of the Commons
  • R. Carson, 1962 G. Hardin, 1968
  • Global public goods
  • Collective goods problems

6
Environmental Collective Goods Problem
  • Benefits are shared globally but costs must be
    extracted from each state individually
  • Need for international regimes (e.g.
    Mediterranean Action Plan - Haas, 1989 )
  • Role of epistemic communities NGOs

7
Defining An Epistemic Community
  • Specific community of experts sharing a belief
    in a common set of cause-and-effect relationships
    as well as common values to which policies
    governing these relationships will be applied.
  • Haas, 1989 384

8
Epistemic Communities
  • Scientists or individuals from any discipline or
    profession who have a strong claim to a body of
    knowledge valued by society knowledge
    brokers, Bodansky, 2001 27.
  • Different from interest groups or other agencies
    by the combination of a shared set of causal and
    principled beliefs, consensual knowledge and
    common interests

9
Role of Scientists
  • Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change
    (IPCC), since 1988
  • Three Assessment Reports (1990, 1995, 2001)
  • Scientists appointed by governments, final
    reports voted on by national delegations
  • Working groups examine economics and impacts as
    well as climate science and meteorology

10
Roles of Epistemic Communities
  • Elucidate cause and effect relationships,
    provide advice about the likely results of
    various courses of actions following a crisis
  • Set the international agenda, contribute to the
    formulation of convergent state policies in
    compliance with regimes
  • Help define the self-interests of a state or
    factions within it

11
Global Climate Change
  • Global warming slow, long-term rise in the
    average world temperature and disruption of
    ecosystems
  • Scientific controversy
  • Significant variation in patterns over time
  • Depends on data collection, modeling
  • Broad agreement on increase in global average
    surface temperature, not over regional effects

12
Greenhouse Problem
  • Human industrial activities burn fossil fuels
    creating greenhouse gases
  • Greenhouse effect increasing concentration of
    gases trap heat in the atmosphere
  • USA worlds largest polluter (25 of emissions,
    4 of world population)

13
Reducing the Greenhouse Effect
  • Reduce use of fossil energy without reducing
    economic activity
  • NGOs focus on renewable energies (solar, wind
    power)
  • Stocking carbon dioxide in ground (COP-10, Dec.
    2004) debate

14
Climate Change Regime - Timeline
  • IPCC, 1988 intergovernmental issue
  • First Assessment Report, 1990
  • Rio Earth Summit, 1992
  • UNFCC enters into force, 1995
  • Kyoto Protocol, 1997
  • Bush withdrawal, 2001
  • Ratification by EU, Japan others , 2001
  • Ratification by Russia (needed), 2004
  • Kyoto Protocol enters into force on 16 Feb. 2005
  • Montreal, December 2005

15
The Framework Convention on Climate Change
(Rio, 1992)
  • Objective limit greenhouse emissions to 1990
    levels by 2000
  • Nonbinding goal
  • No success, US objections to commitments

16
Kyoto Protocol, 1997
  • MITIGATION
  • Commits major industrialized nations to curb
    gases from factories, cars and coal-burning power
    plants to 1990 levels (except USA Australia)
  • Objective 5,2 below 1990 levels by 2008-12
  • Binding penalties for failures
  • Trading of carbon emissions as new commodities
    controversial flexible mechanisms

17
Developing Countries
  • Technology transfer (Clean Development
    Mechanisms) vs. concerns over potential limits to
    growth
  • Many actors, many concerns
  • OPEC, AOSIS
  • Green imperialism (India, China)
  • COP-10 (Argentina, Dec. 2004) focus on
    adaptation in addition to mitigation

18
Upcoming Challenges
  • Successful international environmental
    negotiations? Montreal, 2005 vs. Asia-Pacific
    Partnership on Clean Development Climate
  • Two-level game
  • Free riding problems
  • Recurrent scientific political controversies
  • Past and future ecocide (J. Diamond,
    Collapse, 2005)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com