Title: Cleavages and Party Families across Western Europe
1Cleavages and Party Families across Western Europe
Lecture 4
The Socialist International 1977
2Objectives
- to understand the relationships between
historically rooted cleavages, major parties and
party families - Important concept party family
3Introduction
- The 19th century
- Territorial cleavages which are typical of
early parliamentary life are wiped out by the
massification of politics - The social mobilisation is caused by the
Industrial Revolution - The political mobilisation is linked to the
extension of voting rights and their equalisation
through the abolition of voting restrictions - These processes become increasingly nationalized
which leads to different political and party
systems in Europe
4Introduction
- Nationalisation and democratization are therefore
strictly intertwined - The rapid formation of nationalised electorates
and party systems is determined by the supremacy
of the leftright alignment (D. Caramani)
5Traditional Party families
Left
Green parties???
- Communist Parties
- Socialist/Social Democrats/Labour
- Liberal Parties
- Christian Democrats
- Conservatives
- Centre (Agrarian)
- Ethnic/Linguistic
Right
6Party Families
- West European parties not unique
- Cross-national and cross-temporal similarities
between parties - Defined by
- Party name
- Transnational links/associations
- Origins and sociology
- Ideology and policies
7The history of party families
- Liberals and conservatives (or Catholics in many
countries) are the party families which dominated
Western party systems until the advent of class
parties. - They had the monopoly of representation and
were nationalised from the very beginning. - Conservatives were opposed on the fundamental
issues of political modernisation namely,
democratisation and secularisation
8The history of party families
- Socialist and agrarian parties
- Appear later under the double impact of the
Industrial Revolution and the extension of
suffrage. - These are the parties that develop out of mass
politics - In countries with a catholic minority, catholic
parties developed as mass parties, too
9Definitions
- Political Cleavage
- Political dimension representation of different
interests in a pluralist democracy - Social dimension conflict divides a populace
into (usually) large and opposing groups - Ideological dimension groups have different
beliefs, values and interests - Institutional dimension conflicts are expressed
in an organization with a voice in the political
arena
10Linkage between cleavages and party families
- I. Centre-periphery
- region/language/ethnicity
- Regional parties
- II. Religion
- Catholic/Protestant state/church
clerical/anti-clerical - Conservative/Christian-democratic and liberal
parties - III. Class
- employers/workers middle class/working class
- Socialist/Social democratic/Labour parties
- IV. Rural-urban
- Landowners/commercial, industrial classes
- Agrarian parties
11I. Centre-Periphery
Christian Democrats Socialists, Conservatives
centre
periphery
12Ethno-linguistic parties
- Agrarian/Centre
- largely a Scandinavian phenomenon (also CH)
- Linguistic parties
- where sub-national languages created a regional
identity (B, E, Fin) - Regional/ethnic
- Where a sub-national region asserts an
independent identity (I) - Right-Wing Extremists
- old (Germany, Flanders) and new (Scandinavia)
13II. State-church
- Christian Democratic Party
- Germany (CDU/CSU)
- Belgium (CVP/PSC)
- Italy (DC)
- Netherlands (CDA)
- Austria (ÖVP)
- Netherlands - 3 Calvinist parties until 1970
- (Norway, Sweden, Denmark)
religious defence
old Catholic Parties Christian Democrats
catholic
protestant
state vs church
- Liberal Party
- Belgium (PVV/PLB)
- Germany (FDP)
- Italy (PLI)
- Austria (FPÖ pre-Haider)
- Netherlands (VVD, D66)
- France - old Republicans
Christian Democrats
clerical
anti-clerical
14Christian democratic Parties
- Since 1945 WEs most successful political
movement - newest of large mass parties
- Most of them established after 1945
- Generally replaced 19th c. Catholic parties
15Christian democratic Parties
- CDPs are however not confessional parties
- Rather drawing on traditional Christian thought
(family, social welfare) - Conservative on abortion, education and divorce
- Anti-capitalist, anti-socialist (rejection of
class conflict concept)
16Conservative Parties
- Established in the 19th c. as notables parties in
response to liberal parties - Emphasis on tradition
- Attempt to counter socialist movement and new
middle class - Supported fascism and militarism after WW I
(Germany, Italy, Spain) or failed to resist
(Belgium, France, Norway)
advocated monarchical power Church privileges
Land integrity Ancien Regime Traditional
authority Duties of the subject
opposed nationalism Democracy
Industrialization Secularization Individual
rights Socialism
17Conservative Parties
- After 1945
- Widespread discrediting of WE conservative
parties (resistance) - Catholic church lifted ban against political
involvement - Opened way for Christian Democratic parties as
major party on the right (i.e. the absorption of
the religious dimension and at the same time
accepting liberal-democratic politics) - Scandinavian countries Conservative Parties
survived as one of the two/three parties on the
right - as bourgeois parties - Ideological turn in the 1970s introduction of
19th c. liberal and authoritarian ideology free
market economy, welfare state cuts, strong state,
individualism - 1980s consolidation of party position, shift
away from traditionalism in direction of state
reform (esp. welfare state)
18Liberal Parties
- Earliest parties to be formed (E 1812, B 1846)
- A product of 18th c. thought and French
Revolution - Overtaken by nationalism
- Radical liberal ideas promoted by socialism
- Moderate liberals attracted by conservatism
- Today among the smaller parties but often
coalition partners
Advocated individual rights Rights of
property Parliamentary government Rule by law
Anti clerical Market-economy
opposed Ancien Regime Monarchical power
Church-state axis clericalism
19III. Working class middle class
Christian Democrats Conservatives Liberals
middle class
working class
20Socialist/social democratic/labour parties
- Historically the Northern European countries have
resisted the demands of the working class at the
time of the industrial revolution although did
not tend to actively repression this group - However, in Germany, Austria, Italy and Spain
established classes took repressive action
against the working classes result of which was
that socialist parties became uncompromising in
the approach and over questions of ideology
21Socialist/social democratic/labour parties
- SPs roots in 19th c. working class movement
usually from trade unions - In most cases parliamentary break through after
WWI and after introduction of adult (male)
suffrage - After WWII SPs not dominant as expected
- Boost in late 1990s 12 of 15 EU member states
ruled by SPs
22Socialist parties - ideology
- Advocate working class interests
- Economic and social equality
- Anti-clerical
- Accepted capitalism but state intervention
(welfare state) - Never achieved majority party status (outside
Scandinavia) - Rivalries between CPs and SPs
- Success of SPs undermined electoral strength
- Religion proved more important than class (apart
Scandinavia)
23Communist parties
- Separated from socialist parties after WWI
- 1914 split about support of war
- 1917 Russian Revolution
- Increasing rivalries between SP and CP
- 1945 some strong Com parties emerged
24Communist parties
- Went into post-war coalitions (F, I)
- Problem of Stalinism led to isolation
- Ban in Germany and Finland
- 1970s Development of Eurocommunism
- Nowadays CPs have industrial work place base
only in E, P and I (red belt) there is peasant
support
25IV. Rural - Urban
rural
Liberal parties Socialists
agrarian parties
urban
- Agrarian Party
- Norway
- Sweden
- Denmark
- Finland
26Agrarian parties
- Largely a Scandinavian phenomenon where liberal
parties are weak - Special-interest party for agricultural interests
- Attempted to appeal to urban middle class by
changing names into Centre-parties (Finland,
Norway and Sweden in the 1950s and 60s) - Favour decentralization and protection of the
environment against industrial interests - Both traditional and welfare oriented
- Ideological move to the centre makes it difficult
to distinguish from liberal parties
27Generalizations I
- Every country has
- a major party with its roots in the mobilization
of the class cleavage - a Party on the left (soc, soc-dems, lab) which
appeals to the (old) working class - many countries have major party with rests on the
mobilization of the religious cleavage (either
pro- or anti clerical) - Where there is both class and religious cleavage,
religion proves stronger than class
28Generalizations II
- Where there is a strong Christian democratic
party, there is no strong conservative party
(vice versa) - Where there is a strong socialist party, there is
a weak communist party (vice versa) - Everywhere liberal parties are relatively small
- Parties on the centre-periphery cleavage usually
small but disruptive
29Summary
- Almost nowhere in WE there is a very close fit
between social cleavage and electoral support - Electors can belong to different groups according
to different cleavages - Overlapping cleavages can ease tension between
groups (but may put tension on the elector!)