MPEG21 Digital Item Declaration ISOIEC 210002: an overview - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

MPEG21 Digital Item Declaration ISOIEC 210002: an overview

Description:

data transfer, conversion & ingestion are ... MPEG-21 DIDL document profile' used is not the one used inside ... related to document models & repository ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: jbek
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MPEG21 Digital Item Declaration ISOIEC 210002: an overview


1
A view from the trenches LANL Repository
Jeroen Bekaert and Herbert Van de Sompel Research
Library, Prototyping Team Los Alamos National
Laboratory
2
Introduction
  • MPEG-21 DIDL documents used as AIPs in LANL
    Repository
  • Worked on XSLT to map from LANL DIDL to METS
  • Intensive import of third party data
  • Not yet had the need to import METS IMS from
    other repositories
  • Typically, per information provider
  • different mechanism to transfer content
  • different format to represent content
  • gt data transfer, conversion ingestion are
    major processes
  • Exploring interoperable Archive Export/Ingest of
    structured content from other repositories
  • transfer protocol OAI-PMH
  • transfer format profile of MPEG-21 DID

3
Interoperable Export/Ingest Exploration
  • Projects
  • Mirroring of American Physical Society collection
    at LANL
  • DSpace OAI-PMH/DIDL plug-in
  • Fedora DIDL plug-in
  • mod_oai Apache Web server plug-in
  • Mapping of
  • APS publication (APS AIP),
  • DSpace object (DSpace AIP),
  • Fedora object (Fedora AIP),
  • web resource (Apache AIP)
  • to MPEG-21 DIDL documents (OAIS DIP/SIP).
  • MPEG-21 DIDL document profile used is not the
    one used inside LANL Repository application
    neutral DIDL Transfer Profile

4
Interoperable Export/Ingest Exploration approach
5
Interoperable Export/Ingest Exploration issues
  • Understand
  • document model of archive1
  • transfer document model (DIDL Transfer Profile)
  • in order to be able to map AIP1 to DIP
  • Understand
  • transfer document model (DIDL Transfer Profile)
  • document model of archive2
  • in order to be able to map DIP to AIP2
  • This
  • goes beyond a METS / DIDL / IMS issue
  • is related to document models repository
    architectures
  • is more at the level of Profiles of METS / DIDL /
    IMS than at the level of METS / DIDL / IMS per se

6
Interoperable Export/Ingest Exploration issues
  • Examples
  • Structural
  • DSpace (item bundle bitstream) DIDL (Item
    Component Resource)
  • Identifiers
  • Are identifiers OAIS Content Identifiers, Package
    Identifiers?
  • Are identifiers identifying metadata, bitstreams,
    the document?
  • Lacking identifiers
  • Creation dates
  • Are creation dates those of bitstreams, of the
    Content, of the Package?
  • Inconsistencies
  • Digests for bitstreams, not for metadata
  • What would help A description of a document
    model (archive1, Transfer, archive2) in terms of
    a reference document model

7
Interoperable Export/Ingest Exploration issues
  • Manner in which to express specific types of
    information in the Transfer document model.
  • Using
  • self-defined XML Namespaces
  • specific capabilities native to document model
    on which Transfer profile is built
  • doesnt feel very interoperable.

8
Interoperable Export/Ingest Exploration issues
  • What would help Share plug-in vocabularies
    across document models for Transfer
  • Structure rather than relying on built-in
    hierarchical capabilities of say DIDL express
    via interoperable vocabulary to express
    relationships
  • Digests rather than using METS _at_checksum, use
    W3C XML Signature
  • Identifiers, Creation dates, etc use XML
    Namespaces across Transfer document models
  • Rights rather than using METS rightsMD
    element, use XML Namespace(s) about which
    everyone knows its about rights
  • To put it differently how much of your language
    does someone else need to understand in order to
    understand what you say

9
Interoperable Export/Ingest Exploration issues
  • Granularity of an object
  • e.g. object a complete web site in archive1
    Object single datastream in repo 2
  • how to convey this difference in granularity when
    transferring data
  • can Content Identifiers play a role?
  • What to share
  • which information should be conveyed?
  • which should remain local to a repository?
  • is this application dependent (archiving vs.
    dissemination vs. submission)?

10
Interoperable Export/Ingest Exploration concrete
  • Reference model descriptions on how document
    models relate to reference model
  • Interoperable
  • relationship vocabulary
  • digest approach
  • approach to express native MIME type of
    compressed bitstreams
  • approach to convey identifiers
  • approach to convey creation dates
  • These things might also be used in Intranet
    Profiles of document models
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com