WS Orchestration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

WS Orchestration

Description:

http://devresource.hp.com/drc/technical_white_papers/WSOrch/WSOrchestration .pdf ... executable process (that interacts with other web services) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:111
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: Eyal1
Learn more at: http://www.wsmo.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WS Orchestration


1
WS Orchestration
http//tmitwww.tm.tue.nl/staff/wvdaalst/Publicatio
ns/p176.pdf
http//www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/
library/ws-bpelcol2/
http//devresource.hp.com/drc/technical_white_pape
rs/WSOrch/WSOrchestration.pdf
  • Eyal Oren
  • DERI
  • 2004/04/07

2
Survey of WS orchestration
  • definitions requirements
  • survey of standards
  • BPEL4WS
  • BPML
  • WSCI
  • survey of vendors

3
Definitions
this is the private process, our orchestration is
subset of this
  • orchestration
  • executable process (that interacts with other web
    services)
  • control from the perspective of one business
    partner
  • for implementation
  • workflow
  • choreography
  • sequence of messages
  • public message exchanges
  • for collaboration
  • protocols

this is like our choreography
4
Requirements
  • a-synchronicity
  • need message correlation identifying returning
    calls
  • exception management
  • services (operations) throw catch exceptions
  • compensating transactions
  • resource locking not feasible
  • reusable composition
  • separation process logic used web services
  • dont understand, looking for hierarchy?

we need to have this
we need to have this
we need to have this
goal capability separationweb service
capability separation
5
Standards overview
  • BPEL4WS
  • describes (control logic for) coordination of web
    services
  • Microsoft, IBM, BEA (XLANG WSFL)
  • execution environment (BPWS4J)
  • not considered by W3C not royalty-free
  • BPML
  • describes executable business processes
  • Intalio, Sun, , bpmi.org/members.esp
  • WSCI
  • describes messages between collaborating web
    services
  • Sun, SAP, BEA, Intalio

6
Standards relation
7
BPEL4WS (1)
  • (control logic for) coordination of web services
  • abstract processes
  • choreography
  • public message exchange
  • executable processes
  • orchestration
  • private workflow
  • on top of WSDL

8
BPEL4WS (2)
  • primitive activity (input input-output
    operations)
  • invoke (an operation on a web service)
  • receive (waiting for invocation)
  • reply (responding, in input/output operation)
  • wait (for time)
  • assign (copy compute data to variables)
  • throw (exception)
  • terminate (stop service instance)
  • empty
  • structure activity (control flow)
  • combines primitives using sequence, branch,
    loop, pick, flow
  • need more time to investigate possibilities

9
BPEL4WS (3)
  • (WSDL defines messages, operations, porttypes)
  • link
  • describes conversation between two roles
  • (specifies porttype of service, to receive
    messages)
  • multiple messages can be exchanged during
    conversition
  • partner web service with role in linktype
  • business process list of activities (with
    partners)
  • actual web service grounding can be dynamic
  • unclear yet (WS-Adressing)
  • BPWS4J uses hard-wired at deploy

we need this too (as Axel said on wsmo-d)
10
BPML
  • language for describing business processes
  • simple activity
  • action, assign, call, compensate, delay, fault,
    synch
  • complex activity
  • all, choice, foreach, sequence, switch, until,
    while
  • transaction support (compensation, nesting)
  • exception handling (throw, timeout)

11
WSCI
  • language for describing web services
    collaboration
  • message correlation
  • sequencing rules
  • basic call, delay, empty, fault, spawn, join
  • complex all, choice, foreach, sequence, switch,
    until, while
  • but cannot specify input/output
  • exception handling
  • transactions

is this really only public message exchange then?
12
Comparison
  • BPEL4WS BPMLWSCI
  • intentions are the same
  • no comparison in the article, no thorough search
  • vd Aalst pattern-based comparison
  • WSCI BPML
  • offer same functionality
  • too much overlap to justify separation
  • WSCI can be used to model
  • BPEL4WS BPML
  • little more expressive
  • no semantics
  • too many overlapping constructs

13
Useful for WSMO
  • either borrow requirements
  • asynchronicity
  • exception management
  • compensation
  • message correlation
  • control flow construct (workflow patterns, vd
    Aalst)
  • or use a standard
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com