Title: Institutions and Economic Growth
1Institutions and Economic Growth
- 1) Theoretical papers
- North 1994
- Przeworski and Limongi 1993
- 2) Empirical papers
- Rodrik, Subramanian Trebbi 2004
- Sachs 2003
-
- Email victor.lapuente_at_pol.gu.se Office B532
21st seminar summary of the readings
- Ideal Institutions are logically impossible
- Incumbents will always find ways of taking
advantage of them -
- The best (or least bad) institutions are those
that limit as much as possible their incumbents - E.g. constitutions, check and balances
31st seminar some problems of readings (I)
- Miller co. toy models too abstract and few
non-systematic empirical examples (e.g.
anglo-saxon biased) - Interesting insights for local governments the
professional bureaucrat could work - e.g. city-manager cities gt strong mayor cities,
both in US and across countries - but regarding national governments, not so
clear only some Madisonian solutions work - US gt LA 17th Britain gt 17th Poland, Hungary
- Small efficient residual sounds so nice on
paper - Constitutional ban on deficit, McCain..
41st seminar some problems of readings (II)
- but in practice (some US states, some EU
members) - North and Weingast original, elegant,but two
different stories on one hand, a description of
political events on the other, interests rates
dropping, and no narratives of what is going on
in the middle - We know little of the millions of decisions by
investors - Clark dismantles what is left of NW property
rights were as protected before the Glorious
Revolution as after - ..but he does not offer alternative explanations
- what does explain the industrial revolution in
Britain?
5.Is there hope after the 1st seminar?
- On the one hand, original theoretical mechanisms
without convincing empirical evidence - On the other, elegant evidence without mechanisms
- Lets see if we are luckier today
62. Institutions and Economic Growth
- Analysis of two (relatively) different questions
- (Political Administrative) Institutions ?
Economic Growth - (Political Administrative) Institutions ?
Corruption (QoG) - Theory
- North 1994
- Przeworski and Limongi 1993
- Empirical debate Institutions rule versus. dont
rule - Rodrik, Subramanian Trebbi 2004
- Sachs 2003
-
7Theoretical starting point Transaction Cost
Economics (TCE)
- Coase (1937) Why do Firms Exist?
- Transaction costs are pervasive (45 of the US
GNP?) - TCE ? New Institutional Economics (Williamson
1975)
8Douglass C. North receives the 1993 Bank of
Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of
Alfred Nobel from King Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden.
9North 1994 Economic Performance Through Time
- Critic to Neoclassical Economic Theory
- focus the operation of markets, but doesnt
address Why (some) markets (in some parts of the
world) develop - rejects the role of Institutions and Time
- markets are efficient only if it is costless to
transact, but there are many transaction costs..
10Norths definition of Institutions
- Institutions are the humanly devised constraints
that structure human interaction. - They are made up of formal constraints (e.g.,
rules, laws, constitutions), informal constraints
(e.g., norms of behavior, conventions,
self-imposed codes of conduct), and their
enforcement characteristics.
11Assumptions of his theory
- necessary to dismantle the rationality
assumption - ideas, ideologies, myths, dogmas, and prejudices
matter - Instead of the rationality assumption, he prefers
Simons bounded rationality
12Mental Models Time ? Institutions
- models that formed the informal constraints that
defined the institutional framework of the tribe
and were passed down intergenerationally as
customs, taboos, and myths that provided cultural
continuity - The key to the foregoing story is the kind of
learning that the individuals in a society
acquired through time - Hayek (1960) "the transmission in time of our
accumulated stock of knowledge"
13Path dependence
- Term used to describe the powerful influence of
the past on the present and future - Example of bad path dependence Spain
- The long decline of Spain from the glories of the
Hapsburg Empire of the 16th century to its sorry
state under Francisco Franco in the 20th century
was characterized by endless self appraisals and
frequently bizarre proposed solutions
14Conclusion
- It is the admixture of formal rules, informal
norms, and enforcement characteristics that
shapes economic performance - Informal norms provide legitimacy to a set of
rules -
15Przeworski Limongi 1993
- Does democracy foster or hinder economic
growth? - Criticize North OK, autocrats have problems to
offer credible commitment, but North does not
offer no clear mechanisms of how democracy
provides that commitment - Encompassing lists of mechanisms both Against
and In favor of democracy - What do you think? Some more convincing than
others?
16Rodrik, Subramanian Trebbi 2004
- The Big Question What accounts for the
differences between the worlds richest and
poorest nations? - The 3 Big Answers
- Geography (Diamond 1997, Sachs 2001)
- International Trade (Dollar and Kraay 2004)
- Institutions (North 1990, Acemoglu et al. 2001)
- The Big Problem How to Test Them?
17F
18RST empirical test
19 20Results
- When we include Institutions, Geography and
Integration dont have any additional explanatory
power (in fact, they have the wrong sign!) - The Quality of Institutions Trumps Everything
Else
21Problems?
- Correlations, not Causal Relations..
- Lack of micro-foundations
- Reverse Causality? Tautology
- Omitted variables?
- No clear policy implications
22Test the robustness of the results I
- Institutions also ? accumulation of capital
(human and physical) - Eliminate too influential cases (Singapur,
Ethiopia) and special ones (the neo-European
countries) - Introduce regional dummies (Latin America,
Sub-Saharan Africa, Asia)
23Test the robustness of the results II
- Introduce standard variables in the literature
- Legal origin Common Law (British) vs. Civil Law
(French) - Former British Colony vs. French Colony
- Religion Muslim, Catholic and Protestant
24Conclusion of RST empirical analysis
- Institutions, even controlling for the
traditional variables used in the literature,
stay significant and if anything, their
explanatory power increases
25Sachs 2003
26Quality of Institutions
Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson 2001 Easterly
and Levine 2002 Rodrik, Subramanian, and Trebbis
2002
Geographical and Ecological Variables
Economic Growth
(e.g. climate zone, disease ecology, distance
from the coast)
Sachs 2003
27 The standard institutional model
- ln(Yi) B0 B1 QIi B2 Zi Ei
- QI quality of institutions
- Z geography variables (distance from equator,
mostly)
28Sachs Malaria matters
- How can we measure the effect of Malaria in a
country? - MAL94 of population with risk of malaria
transmission (WHO reports of malaria cases) - Malaria Ecology climate and mosquito abundance
29Results
- Institutions matter
- Some geographical and ecological variables also
matter - Malaria
- population living within 100km of the coast
30 Another non-institutional explanation Clark
31Hi
For
32Hi
For