Title: Deterrence Counts
1Deterrence Counts
- Towards an Anti Corruption Strategy
2What do the trends show
- Transparency International ranks India at 70 out
of 163 countries. Significant improvement since
2005 - In ranking of states Bihar, JK, MP, Karnataka
Rajasthan are amongst the worst Kerala, HP,
Gujarat and AP least corrupt. - Corruption hurts the poorest most and cuts across
all Service Delivery sectors particularly the
Police, Health and ..
3The main actors Politicians Has Political
Corruption increased/decreased over the last
three years data from AP
4The main actors Government Officials Has
Official Corruption increased or decreased over
the last three years? Data from AP
5The Scale of CorruptionPerception Surveys not
perfect but indicate the extent of the problem
- 31 of Food Grains and 36 of Sugar meant for the
Public Distribution System diverted Total
Food-grain subsidy Rs.150 billion. Therefore
Rs.50 billion lost to corruption. - Survey of ten sectors including medical services,
judiciary, police and revenue adm Citizens paid
over 28000 crores/year ( 50 of Defence Budget) (
Source CVC of India)
6Corruption in Service Delivery Corruption
Ranking of Services (2005)
7Corruption in Service Delivery
- Need Based Services are seen as more corrupt
Corruption is greater where there are no
alternative service providers ( e.g schools) and
where the repercussions of not paying a bribe are
high. - Total monetary value of petty corruption is over
Rs.21000 crore. - The largest number of bribes reportedly paid are
for medical services in rural and semi urban
areas( 3 crore households).
8Why does Corruption Exist
- Just as it is impossible not to taste honey or
poison that one may find at the tip of ones
tongue, so it is impossible for one dealing with
government funds not to taste at least a little
bit of the Kings wealth. - Kautilya, The Arthashastra
9But structural incentives can expand the space
for human greed
- The Incentives for Corruption abound
- Poor Enforcement Systems
- Complex and non-transparent administrative
systems of command and control - Monopolistic Service Providers
- Underdeveloped Legal Frameworks
- Weak notion of citizens rights
10So what would constitute a practical strategy?
- Strengthening the Policy Framework
- Electoral Reforms
- Expanding and Reforming Enforcement
- Focusing on Prevention
- Investing in Public Awareness
11Strengthening the Policy Framework
- India needs to fundamentally reform its Legal
Framework - CrPC Act needs to be overhauled
- New Laws need to be instituted
- Lok Pal Act
- Whistleblowers Act
- Forfeiture of Corrupt Civil Servants Property Act
12- Vigilance and Enforcement
13Enforcement Scale vs Response Registration of
cases in Selected States
14Issues in Enforcement
- Vigilance Departments are under-funded,
under-equipped and open to political and
administrative interference. - It is extremely difficult to proceed against All
India Services Officers due to prosecution
hurdles. - Vigilance is seen as a specialized function not
as a cross cutting issue that every business unit
is responsible for.
15OrissaPending Departmental Proceedings
16The Judicial System does not serve as an adequate
deterrent
- The criminal conviction rate in India is about
6. - Enormous delays in the disposal of cases. The CBI
has filed over 6000 cases 50 are pending for
over 5 years. - At the state government, pending cases are even
higher. - In Orissa, the study shows that 12 of the
defendants die before there case comes to trial
The evidence base collapses and memories blur.
17Trial CourtPending Cases in Orissa Courts
18Enforcement So what can be done
- Creating a more independent Vigilance system at
the State level ( e.g A.Ps Vigilance
Commissioner, Karnatakas Lok Ayukta and to some
extent Orissa Vigilance Department) - Making Vigilance wider than the Police Bringing
in more technical specialists - Expanding Internal Vigilance in the Departments
and Districts - Setting up Special Courts and Review Committees
for Departmental Enquiries
19But Enforcement can never be enough Prevention
and Public Awareness is key
- Corruption Proofing the System
- Administrative reforms and simplification of
systems and procedures are critical Examples - Computerization of railway tickets E- Sewa in
AP - Computerization of land records ( Karnataka)
- Decentralization can lead to greater transparency
but also expand the players in the corruption
game - Reducing the layers of approvals and levels of
interface between clients and service providers
is vital.
20The Anatomy of Corruption Accessing Death
Compensation in Jagatsinghpur District
21And it doesnt stop there
22Corruption proofing the system
- Transfers of civil servants is a fertile ground
for Corruption need to have a transparent
transfer and tenure policy Performance based
incentives Need to protect honest civil servants - Procurement Reforms at the central level have
considerably squeezed space for malpractice. Only
few states in India have passed Procurement Laws.
Critical need. - Separate Regulatory and Service Functions.
- Outsource services where possible e.g Urban
hospitals - Monitoring and Evaluation Systems at the state
level are weak and at the district level are
almost non-existent. Need to institute a system
of periodic Satisfaction surveys and link budgets
with outcomes.
23Corruption proofing the system
- The Right to Information Act provides a strong
National Framework within which Administrative
reforms and Public awareness can take place. - Provides framework for many critical reforms in
basic administrative systems - File Management,
government rules and procedures, audit. - Need to build awareness amongst citizens about
the Act.
24 Public Awareness is critical
- Public awareness campaigns are still not seen as
a core area of government investment and continue
to be an add-on. - Asymmetric Information flows where the
supplier controls knowledge leads to weak
accountability norms. - Need to invest and resource Government
institutions with the capabilities to create and
disseminate knowledge. - Civil Society organizations are critical and need
to be partnered ( e.g. Parivartan in Delhi, Lok
Satta in AP).
25Karnatakas Lok Ayukta Focus on Service Delivery
- Combining deterrence with public awareness
- Most powerful of 16 Lok Ayuktas in India.
- Investigations
- Drug adulteration
- Public hospitals (absenteeism, exploitation)
- Transport and registration departments.
- Corruption in municipal government
- Wide publicity may be the best way to check
corruption when vigilance systems are weak and
courts dont work...
26Lok Ayukta In Action
27So what are the lessons
- While better enforcement is essential
- Investments in enforcement need to be combined
with investments in Prevention and Public
Awareness. - Work incrementally Corruption needs to be
tackled at the level of the business unit - Analysis matters Process re-engineering needs
to be seen through the filter of anti-corruption
- Creating competition helps but replacing public
monopolies with private monopolies is dangerous