LEB and Vertex 2001 Trip report - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

LEB and Vertex 2001 Trip report

Description:

223 m2 Si tracking: 200 detectors to exercise production APV25 in DSM good. ... production (cal, B, rad, T, ageing, ...). QA used in prototyping phase (after irr. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: fermil
Category:
Tags: leb | report | trip | vertex

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LEB and Vertex 2001 Trip report


1
LEB and Vertex 2001 Trip report
  • Gabriele Chiodini
  • Fermilab, October 15, 2001 Monday pixel meeting

2
Attended conferences
  • 7th Workshop on Electronics for
  • LHC Experiments. Stockholm,
  • Sweden, 10-14 Sep. 2001.
  • Plenary sessions
  • Partially depleted SOI
  • Trends DSM, FPGA, and PCB.
  • LHC status electronics for Cal, Pix and AMS in
    space.
  • Hera-B commissioning.
  • Parallel sessions
  • Tracker FE Trigger electronics
  • BRad effs Cal electronics
  • Optoelec. -DAQ and DCS
  • Muons FE -GNDcoolingalign.
  • How to win a Nobel price!!!
  • 10th International workshop on
  • vertex detectors. Brunnen,
  • Switzerland 23-28 Sep. 2001.
  • Only plenary sessions
  • Operating vertex
  • Planned vertex
  • Sensors
  • Detector readout
  • Triggering with vertex
  • Hybridization and monolithic
  • Other applications

3
LEB01 Partially depleted SOI (K. Bernstein -
IBM)
Bulk MOSFET
  • QM limitation to scaling law requires new
    concepts PD SOI , DTMOS, FinFET,
  • -------------------------------
  • Floating body effect in SOI.
  • PD SOI operation mode equilibrium, dynamic,
    steady.
  • Delay spatial temporal.
  • Advantages
  • Less C (eSIMOX 4.1, eSi 12).
  • Lower threshold.
  • No Latch-up.
  • Applications SRAM, powerPC,
  • Very few analog circuit in SOI.

PD SOI
4
Trend in industry(1)
  • Scaling in DSM (K. Bernstein-IBM)
  • Now tox 0.1 um (0.25 um is 4 generation beyond
    ).
  • Scaling limitation due to QM (Roll-off from
    Morthys law if not innovation).
  • Problems Process spread (yield), power and
    temperature distribution, electromigration, hot
    carriers, SEU from surrounding material, oxide
    scaling (5 atoms, Igate is an issue),
    interconnect capacitive coupling, V drop.
  • Innovation
  • Device DP SOI, FinFeT, Strained Si MOSFET.
  • Package Chip Stack Module, 3D neural network.
  • System Compiler and multiprocessor parallelism
    (its the futureno monster chip).
  • PC board (J.Bovier- Creative Electronic System)
  • Strong demand from new chip and technology BGA
    and FBGA, fast dynamic, multi PS, good cooling,
    low EMI.
  • New board require a high level designs (no change
    after).
  • Software testability (for example JTAG chain).
  • BGA and FPGA package limits the re-workability.
  • Follow the design rules and stay in contact with
    your provider.
  • 18 month PC board delivering for CES.

5
Trend in industry(2)
  • Progress in FPGA (P.Alfke - Xiling)
  • PS 1.5V (3.3V is dead, future 0.8V), good
    decoupling at LV is a problem.
  • Clock 200MHz OK, gt 500MHz need send clockdata
    (c is finite).
  • What we need
  • I/O levels.
  • serial Gbyte I/O.
  • embedded processor.
  • RAM or easy external RAM interface.
  • Virtex-E (mature). Virtex-II (adolescent)
    multistandard I/O and efficient arithmetic.
    Virtex-II Pro (embryonic) MICROBLAZE 125 MHz on
    VirtexII.
  • SEU in commercial FPGA (for space, S. Mattsson)
  • SETransient (for ex. glitch in the data or clock
    line) not seen in static mode.
  • Ions, protons,m and neutrons irradiation.
  • Antifuse an SRAM (often hang) based FPGA.
  • Xiling, Lucent, ATMEL, LATTICE, ACTEL, MEC.
  • Lower V more Upset, gold is bad, Xiling is on
    epilayer do not latch-up.
  • Xiling regular FF and Triple red. FF, readback
    (bitstream repair).
  • Upset depend on frequency (non tested).
  • Ion Xiling lower Eth than ACTEL but 100 time
    smaller cross section plateau.
  • Proton Xiling cross section 10E-14cm2, ACTEL
    10 times more.

6
LHC Status Reports(1)
  • LHC (T.Taylor)
  • Commissioning 1 January 2006.
  • LEP 90 dismounted.
  • Low beta 0.5m (0.25m you get SLHC, its feasible
    but BCOlt25ns difficult).
  • Lattice dipole magnets from 3 companies 3
    working out of 4 (understood why), more expensive
    than expected. Test all first 300-400 than
    decide. Production slope not bad but if problem
    show up they go out of schedule.
  • Low beta quadrupoles from KEK and FNAL OK.
  • String test good. String2 test necessary for
    final installation.
  • LHC Experiments (J. Engelen)
  • Starting construction and learning how to do mass
    production.
  • FE more difficult than though (SLHC need to
    change all detectors).
  • CMS (4 reviews/year)
  • Surface hall ready but cavern delayed by natural
    rock substitute by concrete
  • Yokes ready. Coil ready for 2004.
  • 223 m2 Si tracking 200 detectors to exercise
    production APV25 in DSM good.
  • Pixel readout chip translated from DMILL to DSM.
  • Ecal very noisy FE for APD. Muon Drift chamber
    OK, RPC need oils to work (big battle).
  • DAQTrigger pilot project ready.

7
LHC Status Reports(2)
  • ATLAS
  • Solenoid ready. 9m Prototype coil installed (goal
    25m). 8 rings needed.
  • Tracker pixel (DMILL to DSM FE issue) installed
    independently 1 year after the tracker, SCT FE
    barrel OK, SCT FE end cup not OK.
  • Accordion Lar (no gaps) started electrodes
    production (more or less).
  • Tile Hcal very well.
  • Muons stand-alone high precision big chambers
    (quality control for mass production crucial).
  • DAQtrigger go very well.
  • LHCb
  • Vertex 300 um n-on-n single side, double metal
    layer microstrip.
  • Traker silicon straws.
  • Rich HPDs 1025 channels (500um x 500um),
    S/N50, 25 MHz clock will be reached in next
    version.
  • Ecal and Hcal OK.
  • Muon RPC(no so good so far) MWPC.
  • ALICE
  • Starting construction, TDR and RD to do.
  • A lot of technologies involved but in good shape
    pixel, SSD, SDD, RICH (works at STAR), TPC,
    TOF ( multigap RPC is a novel concept dt70ps),
    ECAL(CMS), L3 magnet.

8
Electronics status reports
  • Hybrid pixel (M. Campell)
  • ATLAS, CMS, BTeV, ALICE/LHCb. BTeV is very
    relevant and must be watched.
  • DSM ALICE FE ready, LHCb next iteration BTeV FE
    almost ready.
  • DMILL conversion in DSM ATLAS and CMS.
  • 3D pixelwire chamber with junction. No dead
    area, likely rad-hard.
  • Scaling new current mode, dynamic range
    problems, LV problem.
  • Cal (V. Radeka, I encourage the people to be
    free to speak )
  • Difficulty large dynamic range (15-16 bit),
    uniformity and calibrations, fast.
  • CMS 1fiber/crystal. No heat. Long tail killed by
    CMS (not for pile-up but because radiation
    dependent) but ALICE can effort the tail. FNAL
    chip tested but noise larger and next iteration
    needed (inside 800 Mbit/s serializer). How much
    FE inside and outside? Problem of power.
  • ATLAS FE concentrated in the end of barrel (LHCb
    away few meter). In Tile-fiber the exponential
    tail is clipped (also if 5photoe/Mev!!!).
    Calibration problem with I constant and 0.1
    accuracy due to parasitic L. Coherent noise is a
    problem, ground, shielding EMI to understand.
  • FE good again in the next interaction!!!. LV
    regulator no progress (nobody wants work on CERN
    solution). Discrete component better than IC.
    Optical link still problems. Availability of
    technology is an issue (Vddd3V). Spares and
    money.
  • VLHC and SLHC detectors are behind machine, rad
    effects, dynamic range issue.
  • O.1 um good for digital but analog and mix is
    hard tunneling gives large Igate.
  • Suggestion Faraday cage between FE and detector
    in big system (Cu layer is good).

9
Hera-B electronic commissioning
  • In almost every subsystem there were surprises
    after assemblies
  • Rare and random chips and passive components
    failure.
  • Commercial optical link receiver digital signals
    sensitive to particle flux.
  • LV broke soon, spikes in 240V, sensing failed.
  • Ground and shielding redesigned (also for
    crates).
  • Cross talk analog and digital lines.
  • Lessons
  • Hardware trigger must be tested also with no
    detector working.
  • SMT connector better than ST connector.
  • Quality of the board must be good.
  • Online masking of hot channels.
  • More expertise than one needed.
  • Software for commissioning need a lot of work.
  • GND, shielding and EMI critical.
  • Hardware needs to support debugging on-line
    monitoring.
  • Use LVDS instead of open collector.
  • Regular ¾ month reviews from other experiments.

10
Tracker FE (1)
  • ALICE (all DSM)
  • SSD
  • HAL25 from ALICE28C 128 channels FE double side.
    JTAG programming and controller, Reg with
    majority vote logic for SEU (new), OK but some
    yield problems.
  • Ladder endcap electronics controls 28 hybrids (6
    FE chip/hybrid), power control, power protection
    (prevents latch-up, 1/m in PHOBE), readout, I/O
    buffering 25 m, JTAG. Solution 2 ASIC analog
    buffer (now instable) remaining functions (OK).
  • Pixel
  • Very nice test stand pci card in pc, vme
    interface, jtag, daq adapter board. Used for
    wafer, bench, xray, Vpulse, beam. 65 kHz trigger
    rate. Labview ROOT analysis. Calibration few
    minute per chip.
  • Pilot chip to controls 55chips on ladder 1 and
    2. 800 Gbit/s G-link compatible serializer and
    optical link receiver.
  • SDD
  • large dynamic range FE and analog sampling
    (PASCAL chip OK). Huge amount of data after
    digitations (AMBRA chip, good up to 60 Krad but
    memory die at 5 rad, now RAM in DSM). Two chips
    to avoid cross-talk.

11
Tracker FE (2)
  • LHCb (all DSM)
  • BEETLE1.1 chip for SVD, VETO?, RICH and more
    tested fine. 128 channel in pipeline, analog and
    binary readout not sparsified. 25 nsec peaking
    time (2 time worse than exp.). Submitted
    BEETLE-FE1.1-FE1.2-SR1.0 for improved peaking
    time and SEU hard regs and readback.
  • ALICE1-LHCb for pixel and RICH.
    Qthminlt1000e_at_Qnoiselt129e with sensor (no 3 bit
    adjust). LV1.8V (1.6V designed). Reg redundancy.
    Sigma upset 60 Mev proton 3e10-16cm2, Eth5MeV
    mm2/mg. 12 Mrad OK. SPS 150GeV pion beam, good
    efficiency, working frequency 10 MHz.
  • ATLAS
  • SCT Single side 12cm long sensors.
  • ABCD3T chip in DMILL. Module tested in beam OK.
    Irradiation up to 3E14/cm2 need 500V and the
    TW10 ns, timing change with irradiation. Good
    for p, gamma, pions. Starting production.
  • SCT128A chip in DMILL. OK, 29yield
    (3FE19ADC22Dig44MUX).
  • Pixel MCM chip in DMILL. LVDS output link. Works
    OK up to 90 MHZ. 8 board irradiated at 30C up to
    30 Mrad. After irradiation works up to 33 MHz
    (goal 40 MHz, simulation 80 MHz). Yield lt50 ,
    actually 11.

12
Radiation and B effects on electronics
  • N and low gamma irradiation on commercial amp,
    switch, Vreg, DAC and ADC (J.A. Agapito).
  • Low dose rate effect in test structure (for ABDC
    chip of ATLAS)
  • Annealing is always beneficial and can not
    explain LDRE.
  • No LDRE observed in DMILL (max 0.5 krad/s up to
    10 Mrad). Easy and more realistic irradiation
    test.
  • Damage higher if you dont bias (h trapped drift
    due to E). Someone says that the opposite is true
    for CMOS.
  • Antifuse-FPGA for CMS DT in u-det tracker (1
    rad/Y). ACTEL A54SX32 with redundancy
    architecture and partition. SEU due to low energy
    h and n negligible. SEU lt 2.9E-12cm2/chip
    (2.2SEU/y) for Ep60 MeV. TID up to 20 krad OK,
    40 krad still working.
  • TID and SEU in FPGA in L1 muon for ATLAS
    (100rad/y). Xiling Virtex (2.5V) SRAM
    basedASIC(1FF)FPGA(30FF). SEU4E-14cm2/bit and
    1.6E-13 cm2/chip stack for 60 MeV p. Readback and
    reprogramming. 40 MHz clock, SEU not frequency
    dependent (I dont believe it). In not-hardened
    flash PROM test SEUlt1.3E-18cm2 !!!! 50 krad gamma
    after annealing is OK.
  • CAEN HV, LV modules tested with p (60MeV,
    7krad2e10p/cm2), gamma, n (60 MeV, 2E1011n/cm2),
    and under B (10 kGauss 5-10 loss in worse
    case). Good for CMS u-det but ATLAS has 10 times
    more n.
  • Atlas muon TDC LSI (Toshiba Gate array 0.3um
    CMOS) instead of FPGA. Slow PLL, SEU measurable
    but tolerable, no latch-up.

13
Opto-electronics(1)
  • 75um precision CMS u-barrel alignment n
    irradiation p(18MeV)Be up to 2.6E12 8E13 n/cm2
    of COTS LED (light decreases), LED driver,
    controller (SEU), lens, video sensor CMOS
    (synchronization and imaging lost at very end, OK
    with p but a lot of SEU) .
  • GOL Gbit/s data transmitter for LHC
    (P.Moreira
    http//cern.ch/proj-gol).
  • DSM, 32 bit/I, G-link and Gbit-Ethernet,
    0.8-1.6Gbit/s. Redundancy in logic not in the
    serialiser, wire wired bits.
  • Error free 4 day test but at 1.6MHz eye pattern
    not ideal (next version fix that).
  • 10 Mrad 10 keV gamma no change.
  • SEU lt 3.2E-13cm2 at 800 MHz for 60 MeV p. Ion
    test Eth measured (5-15MeVcm2/mg), increases
    with f, loss of lock is the dominant SEU.
  • SEU OK for serializer 10 times higher for PLL.
  • 100 samples to give to users. Few change for CMS
    and less SEU for PLL.

14
Opto-electronics(2)
  • LHCb RICH optical link trasmitter GOL(800Mbit/s)
    VCSELmultimode fibers. 1MHz not suppressed
    readout for L1.
  • Laser driver array for optical transmission at
    LHC (G. Cervelli).DSM 3 channels for analogue
    and digital signals. Work very well, robust to
    Upset and total dose up to 20 Mrads. PDF of the
    production up to /-3 sigma measured.
  • QA manual for the CMS tracker optical links for
    environmental tests in pre-production and
    production (cal, B, rad, T, ageing, ). QA used
    in prototyping phase (after irr. discovered laser
    and photodiode dead and glass dark).
  • Analogue opto-hybrids for CMS tracker extensively
    tested now starts pre-production. 17000 assembled
    pieces from 2002 to 2004.
  • ATLAS SCT optical link. 30Mev,24GeV p and gamma
    Truelight VCSEL ltlt1 failure after 10y. 10mA thr
    instead of 5 mA. Redundancy connections not
    increase noise. BER good. Package of
    6hybrid6flex. Ready for mass production.
  • DMILL R/T optical link for ATLAS pixel 80 MHz
    data Tr., 40 MHz clock and Bi-Phase Mark decoder.
    25 GeV p irradiation. He didnt show up.
  • Optical link for ATLAS Tile-cal alternative to
    FPGA Chicago solution. Series of problems, now
    try with CERN device like GOL.

15
Power distribution
  • Power supplies CMS-ECAL APD-HV. Tested CAEN
    (SYS1527HV4ch) and ISEG (HP-3858A HV8ch). Good
    ripple for both. Stability test CAEN is better
    (less variation, all channels behave the same).
  • PS and distribution for ATLAS SCT.
  • 4088 module each one is own power cable.
  • 3 different cables LM flex (Al)LM special
    cable(Al, copper) cable. http/merlot.ijs.si/cin
    dro/low_mass.html.
  • HV and LV together and twisted (cost? heat?too
    dense pack?).
  • Too many connectors and cables. Too late to
    optimize, next prototype (Feb02) than
    pre-production (Apr02).
  • Maximum voltage drop highly above safety margin
    for ASICs. Rad Hard regulator located in PP2 in
    RD state.

16
Operating vertex detectors (1)
  • CDF
  • L00 pick-up noise from C fiber, removable by
    software but bad S/N about 10.
  • 5 DSSD layers (lessons)
  • Each layer is unique (5 sensor, 6/10 hybrids)
    reduce parts.
  • Difficult assembly (25 of all module need repair
    work) work in pipe-line and use single side
    sensors.
  • ISL Every was very carefully tested before but
    in the final installation the cooling fluid
    doesnt circulate. Glue blockage seen in Al elbow
    with new boroscope. October fixed with laser.
  • Problem after installation
  • 1.4 SVXII1 wedge damaged wires bonding on the
    port card
  • 2.8 SVXII2 wedge broken cable
  • 0.3SVXII½ ladder has dead FE
  • Cooling ISL central part
  • Matching Inp/Out optical fiber impedance
    (introduce air or mylar, V up)
  • PS communication unreliable
  • Beam slope0.6mrad (must be lt 0.1mrad for
    vertexing) Beam center3mm (not lt 1mm, lifetime
    compromised). Move all detector by 3 mm.
  • Lessons
  • Avoid custom made components
  • Long installation delay from vendor too
  • Single component failures better affect
    efficiency and not acceptance.

17
Operating vertex detectors (2)
  • D0
  • 4Hdisk6Barrel12Fdisk DSSD. IP30um up to etalt3.
  • Failure modes
  • 30 yield p-stop isolation defects in 90 degrees
    stereo angle.
  • Micro discharging effects p-implants edge not
    aligned with electrodes.
  • Lifetime limited by bypass capacitance.
  • Detector assembled and powered on
  • 15 chips not in the readout because they can not
    be downloaded (cables?, connectors?, chips?).
    Should recover more 50 in October.
  • Correlated noise. No sparsification up to now.
  • Very good mechanical alignment (thanks Sidet)
  • Lessons
  • Use SSD
  • Much simpler design (with 6 sensor types were
    logistically very hard. Big enterprise!!!)

18
Operating vertex detectors (3)
  • Babar
  • Rad hard up to 2 Mrad
  • ½ module not working out of 208. 1 dead module
    during operation
  • Power failure magnet quenching.
  • Radiation
  • No radiation damage, hit efficiency 98, dE/dx
    2sigma sep. pion/K.
  • Radiation monitoring with pin diode. NIEL scaling
    works (dIfluence). Type inversion with e-
    (unexpected, no explanation).
  • Modules replacement 2004.
  • Alignment crucial for sin(2beta)
  • Minimize residual now one plane each time but in
    the future inversion of full matrix 6x(plane)E2
    matrix.
  • Overlap hit very important for alignment,
    statistics not a problem.
  • Sin(2beta) measurements do not depend on the
    resolution function parameterization.
  • New method necessary to extract lifetime better
    than PDG.

19
Operating vertex detectors (4)
  • Belle
  • DSSD (yield in each layer 98.8, 96.3, 93.5).
  • FE VA1 (IDEAS, Norway) work well but loose gain
    10 time faster than expected (X ray beam losses
    was not noticed orbit fixed gold foil).
    Damaged modules replaced quickly and we could
    measure sin(2beta).
  • 2002 upgraded vertex more rad-hard DSSD, more
    rad tolerant chip VA2, new beam pipe (R1.5 cm)
    for less background. (Luminosity increases fast).
  • Difficult to predict any problem radiation
    monitoring necessary (pin diode radFET, do not
    use vertex).
  • CleoIII
  • CVD diamond support. Reached lt 2 Xo.
  • DSSD Hamamatzu
  • FE BE chip Honeywell Rad-hard.
  • RC chip (CSEM) AC and Rbias on separate chip
  • Encapsulated wire bonds.
  • 60 efficiency r-phi layer1 (z layers OK, layers
    2-3 OK)
  • 3 broken Hybrid during installation.
  • 0 efficiency along rings getting worse with time
    (now also layer 2). Radiation sickness already at
    10-20 kRad. Vbias limited at 100 V. Encapsulation
    do not permit reworking.

20
Operating vertex detectors (5)
  • Hera-B
  • Large Roman pot system not interfering with Hera
    storage ring.
  • Two iteration needed to arrive to the final
    system.
  • Redundant pumping system turbos penning Ti
    sublimation (problems with Al cup out gassing at
    the begining).
  • Match beam impedance (shunt impedance Rsgt100k for
    52Mhz/f) Al tube with holes, 4 Steel strip, 8
    BeCu wires (all equivalent Rs reduced a factor of
    100). (MAFIA32 3D software).
  • No beam pick-up in the electronics (shielding
    works) but RF skin depth still not optimal (some
    RF resonances present).
  • Binary Ice system with two cooling and pumping
    circuits for redundancy
  • Not recommended for Tlt-4C viscosity increase, no
    benefits from binary system, safety hazard due to
    now explosive water-alcohol mixture.
  • I will skip H1, Zeus, STAR, PHOBOS and ATHENA.
  • First blast at RICH very scaring (PHOBOS few
    channels lost and gain changed).

21
Planned vertex (1)
  • CDF and D0 upgrade
  • SSD and high voltage detetcors
  • SVX4 in DSM
  • Few hybrid types.
  • Less material (for ex. port card out of tracking
    region)
  • No double metal but kapton. No optical link but
    Cu transmission line (flex circuit).
  • ATLAS SCT
  • Sensors Hamamatzu, CiS, Sintef
  • Termocycle for every hybrid and for subset of
    modules.
  • Pre-production is starting.
  • ATLAS pixel
  • Insertable layout. Less module more material in
    the forward region. One year later others.
  • Al cooling pipe instead of C (broke at 8 Atm).
    Fluid C3F4.
  • Going in DSM (right now Qthrms1000e- after 5 bit
    trimming) 50 Mrad radiation test OK.
  • Module similar to BTeV. Thermal C is strong and
    can break wire bonds (no so far).
  • Chip in DSM FE, MCC, VDC, DORIC. Engineering run
    in few weeks.
  • Sensor tiles CiS gave good sensors (we dont
    know the manufacture yield, maybe 3 out of 15),
    Tesla gave no one (now maybe understood the
    problem).
  • 50 dummy module from two vendors. Assembly are
    going on but very slow process.

22
Planned vertex (2)
  • CMS silicon tracker
  • A lot of tests SSD Hamamatzu with p/n, AC
    coupled, polysilicon R , 300-500um, low
    resistivity, rho1.5-3KOhmcm, metal overhang the
    p implant (500 to 600 V Vbreak).
  • Crystal orientation lt100gt instead of usual lt111)
  • Radiation up to 3E14 1 MeV eq n/cm2, Vdepl280V.
  • Less interstrip capacitance.
  • Layout details in the talk.
  • APV25 chip in DSM has pion SEU cross section few
    times larger than us.
  • CMS pixel
  • SEU handled by frequent chip reset.
  • Sensor 11GR single open p-ring hold 1000V
    (double break at 300 V)
  • Single ring break at gt 600 V after 6E1014p/cm2
  • Double and double crossed have 2 soft and hard
    breakdown after irradiation (not present in
    diode, maybe premature breakdown for some
    pixels).
  • Bump bonding in house capability (PSI)
  • P-spray is going to be developed at PSI.

23
Planned vertex (3)
  • ALICE pixel
  • Qthlt1000/-200e- after 3 bit trimming, 32x256
    pixels.
  • 6 wafer(86 chip each) tested at 300um and 750um
    thickness.
  • Yield class I(30), II(20 no injection more than
    6000ch) ,III(20), IV(30bad).
  • Assemblies with AMS and VTT of p/n Canberra
    sensors (150-200um thick) and chips on PC board
    acceptable (Thr and noise similar to bare chips).
    Test beam OK.
  • LHCb tracker
  • 9 stations, all different.
  • SSD p/n 6 wafer. 5C cold hydrogen box (Al foil
    foam material).
  • Test beam with SPA (Kiev) detectors oxygenated
    and with multiguard rings. They have too early
    breakdown.
  • LHCb vertex locator (impact parameter trigger)
  • 1.3E13neq/cm2/y at 0.8 cm.
  • phi and r sensors. The r as 9 mm strip near the
    center.
  • Test beam Double side Delphi, N/n Hamamatzu
    and p/n micron.
  • SSD n/n (from test beam), double metal and
    analog readout.
  • Impact parameter trigger with 150-250 pc. B
    would help a lot. New idea superL1.
  • L0 pile up VETO efficiency of 30-40 of single
    b-bbar events at optimal luminosity.

24
Miscellanea
  • ROSE
  • Carbonated Si is less rad tolerant, Oxigenated
    more (large reduction reverse annealing, ONEIL
    violation).
  • Large variation of standard silicon likely due to
    C concentration (Sintef always good). For same
    material more stable after oxygenation.
  • The ratio C/O rules the behavior.
  • Puzzle neutron-proton explained by the
    interchange-transfer model
  • Coulomb interaction produces vacancies (sucked
    by O defects)
  • Nuclear interaction produce clusters
  • Oxygenation useful only for n/n/p sensor and not
    p/n (help only electron collection).
  • CDF impact parameter and track trigger
  • Almost commissioned after a lot of problems. No
    L2 processor yet.
  • Not completely sure we pick up the right event.
  • The material budget was more than expected.
  • Lessons
  • Z alignment is challenge (beam slope
    correctable).
  • Less number of boards and more firmware.
  • Plan for commissioning and debugging, not only
    data taking.
  • PLD/FPGA 6 years old.
  • More software effort.
  • Test with no real detector and away of the
    trigger room necessary.

25
Summary talk vertex2001
  • C. Damerell
  • Operating vertex very complex
  • Difficult to access and long sensor chain in one
    ladder.
  • Very sensitive to errors and beam losses.
  • QA precision necessary.
  • Group meeting, reviews, written document and
    worksheets necessary.
  • SSD preferred, but if DSD floating electronics
    recommended.
  • Wire bonds yield and thermal cycling necessary.
  • Near future
  • Vertex with pixel (except LHCb), tracking with
    microstrip and gas chambers.
  • Deep Submicron CMOS electronics. Concerns LV and
    I protection.
  • Vertex triggering on-line BTeV is going in the
    right direction.
  • Linear collider
  • Hybrid pixel are almost ready but too much
    material (20 times more).
  • High speed column based CCD and Monolithic Active
    Pixel Sensor are the preferred solution (not
    depleted device). Lot of progress but
    Rad-hardness must be tested (different from
    CMOS).
  • A lot of not high energy applications.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com