Warranties and Breach of Contractual Duty

About This Presentation
Title:

Warranties and Breach of Contractual Duty

Description:

... not perform his duties specified in Articles 348-351, the buyer may exercise ... Implied Warranty: Fitness for Particular Purpose ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: cce4

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Warranties and Breach of Contractual Duty


1
Warranties and Breach of Contractual Duty
  • Warranties
  • Relationship between Breach of Warranty and
    Nonperformance

2
Warranties
  • Definition
  • Nature
  • Types
  • The Warranties of Title
  • The Warranties of quality

3
Definition of the Liability of Warranties
  • A constructive liability which the seller shall
    take if the object sold is defect or void title.

4
Warranties under Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) in
the USA
  • Warranties
  • Warranty of Title (Implied warranty)
  • The title shall be good and its transfer rightful
  • Warranty of Quality
  • Express Warranties
  • Part of the basis of bargain
  • by Affirmation, Promise, Description, Sample or
    model.
  • Implied Warranty
  • Merchantability
  • Fitness for Particular Purpose.

5
Classification of Warranty
  • ROC civil Code
  • Warranty of defect of title
  • The warranty of quiet possession (349)
  • The warranty of legal existence of the right(350)
  • Warranty of defect of thing
  • The warranty of value (354I)
  • The warranty of function agreed(354I)
  • The warranty of quality guaranteed (354II)

6
Classification of Warranty
  • PRC Contract Law
  • Warranty of title ( defect of title)
  • The warranty of quiet possession (150)
  • The warranty of legal existence of the right(350)
  • Warranty of thing (defect of thing)
  • The warranty of quality agreed(153)
  • The implied warranty of quality (154)

7
The Liability for Warranties of Title
  • The buyer may claim damages or avoid the contract
    of sale
  • If the seller does not perform his duties
    specified in Articles 348-351, the buyer may
    exercise his rights in accordance with the
    provisions concerning non-performance of
    obligations. (RCC Article 353)

8
The Requirements to Establish the Liability for
Warranties of Title
  • The defect on title must be existed at the time
    the contract is formed.
  • The warranty for good title
  • The seller shall warrant that the thing sold is
    free from any right enforceable by third parties
    against the buyer.(RCC Article 349)
  • Apply to any kinds of objects sold.
  • The warranty for the actual existence of the
    title
  • The seller of a claim of prestation or any other
    right shall warrant the actual existence of such
    prestation or right. The seller of valuable
    securities shall also warrant that it shall not
    be declared voidance through public summons. (RCC
    Article 350)
  • Apply to any kinds of objects sold except
    chattels and real estate.

9
The Requirements to Establish the Liability for
Warranties of Title
  • The buyer shall be in good faith.
  • If the buyer knew at the time of concluding the
    contract the defect of the right sold, the seller
    is not bound to warrant such defect, unless
    otherwise provided by contract. (RCC Article 351)
  • The defect on title has yet to removed when the
    buyer claim damages.

10
Warranty of title in PRC
  • Classification
  • The warranty of quiet possession
  • The seller is obligated to warrant that the buyer
    will be free from any third party claim against
    it in respect of the subject matter delivered,
    except otherwise provided by law. (PCL Article
    150)   

11
Warranty of title in PRC
  • Prerequisites
  • The defect exists before delivery
  • The buyer has no knowledge about the defect
  • Where the buyer knew or should have known that
    the subject matter was subject to a third party
    claim at the time of conclusion of the contract,
    the seller does not assume the obligation
    prescribed in Article 150 hereof. (PCL Article
    151)

12
Warranty of title in PRC
  • Effect
  • PCL
  • Where the buyer has conclusive evidence
    establishing that a third person may make a claim
    on the subject matter, it may withhold payment of
    the corresponding price, except where the seller
    has provided appropriate assurance. (PCL Article
    152) (compare PCL art 66 67)
  • Terminate the contract (PCL art 94) 
  • Claim damage (PCL art 97)

13
The Requirements to Establish the Liability for
Warranties of quality
  • The existence of defect in quality
  • The seller of a thing shall warrant that the
    thing sold is, at the time when the danger passes
    to the buyer according to the provisions of
    Article 373, free from any defect in quality
    which may destroy or impair
  • its value, or
  • its fitness for ordinary efficacy ,or
  • its fitness for the efficacy of the contract of
    sale.
  • However, if the extent of the impairment is of no
    importance, such impairment shall not be deemed
    to be a defect.
  • The seller also shall warrant that, at the time
    the danger passes the thing has the guaranteed
    qualities. (RCC Article 354)

14
The Requirements to Establish the Liability for
Warranties of quality
  • Defect in quality shall be existed at the time of
    delivery
  • The seller of a thing shall warrant that the
    thing sold is, at the time when the danger passes
    to the buyer according to the provisions of
    Article 373, free from any defect in quality (RCC
    Article 354I)
  • The profits and dangers of the object sold pass
    to the buyer at the time of delivery, unless
    otherwise provided by contract.(RCC Article 373)
  • If the buyer requests that the object sold be
    delivered at a place other than the place where
    delivery ought to be made, the dangers pass to
    the buyer at the time when the seller delivers
    the object to the person who transports it or is
    entrusted with its transportation.(RCC Article
    374)

15
The Requirements to Establish the Liability for
Warranties of quality
  • The buyer shall be in good faith and without
    gross negligence
  • A seller is not responsible for such defect of
    quality in the thing sold as specified in the
    first paragraph of the preceding article, if the
    buyer knew of the defect at the time when the
    contract was made.
  • If a defect of the kind specified in the first
    paragraph of the preceding article has remained
    unknown to the buyer in consequence of gross
    negligence, the seller is not responsible if he
    has not guaranteed that the thing is free from
    the defect, except in the case that he has
    intentionally concealed it. (RCC Article 355)

16
The Requirements to Establish the Liability for
Warranties of quality
  • The buyer shall inspect the object sold and
    seasonally notify the seller
  • The buyer is bound to examine without delay the
    thing received in accordance with the nature of
    such thing and as far as the ordinary procedure
    of affairs allows it, and should he discover any
    defect for which the seller is responsible, he
    shall immediately notify the seller of such
    defect.
  • If the buyer delays giving the notice mentioned
    in the preceding paragraph, he is deemed to have
    accepted the thing, except in case where the
    defect is one which would not have been revealed
    by ordinary examination.
  • Should a defect, which could not have been
    discovered immediately, be discovered
    subsequently, notice shall be sent to the seller
    without delay after the discovery. If the buyer
    delays giving such notice, the thing is deemed to
    be accepted. (RCC Article 356)

17
The Liability for Warranties of quality
  • General liability
  • Reduction of the price
  • When there is a defect in the thing sold for
    which, according to the provisions of the five
    preceding articles, the seller is responsible for
    a warranty, the buyer has the option to rescind
    the contract or to ask for a reduction of the
    price, unless in the case specified, that a
    rescission of the contract would constitute an
    obvious unfairness of the transaction the buyer
    is only entitled to ask for a reduction of the
    price. (RCC Article 359)

18
The Liability for Warranties of quality
  • Rescission of the contract
  • When there is a defect in the thing sold for
    which, according to the provisions of the five
    preceding articles, the seller is responsible for
    a warranty, the buyer has the option to rescind
    the contract or to ask for a reduction of the
    price, unless in the case specified, that a
    rescission of the contract would constitute an
    obvious unfairness of the transaction the buyer
    is only entitled to ask for a reduction of the
    price. (RCC Article 359)

19
The Liability for Warranties of quality
  • Particular liability
  • Tender another object without defect
  • When the thing sold is a thing designated only as
    to its kind, and the thing is defective, the
    buyer may, instead of rescission of the contract
    or a reduction of the price, immediately request
    the seller to deliver in exchange another thing
    free from defect.
  • The seller is also bound to warrant that the
    thing delivered in exchange under the preceding
    paragraph is free from defect. (RCC Article 364)

20
The Liability for Warranties of quality
  • Right to damages
  • In the absence of a quality of the thing sold,
    which was guaranteed by the seller, the buyer may
    demand to compensate for the injury of
    nonperformance, instead of rescission of the
    contract or of a reduction of the price.
  • The same rule shall be applied if the seller has
    intentionally concealed a defect in a thing. (RCC
    Article 360)

21
Exclusion of Warranties
  • (3) Notwithstanding subsection (2)
  • (a) unless the circumstances indicate otherwise,
    all implied warranties are excluded by
    expressions like "as is", "with all faults" or
    other language which in common understanding
    calls the buyer's attention to the exclusion of
    warranties and makes plain that there is no
    implied warranty  and
  • (b) when the buyer before entering into the
    contract has examined the goods or the sample or
    model as fully as he desired or has refused to
    examine the goods there is no implied warranty
    with regard to defects which an examination ought
    in the circumstances to have revealed to him 
    and
  • (c) an implied warranty can also be excluded or
    modified by course of dealing or course of
    performance or usage of trade.
  • (4) Remedies for breach of warranty can be
    limited in accordance with the provisions of this
    Article on liquidation or limitation of damages
    and on contractual modification of remedy
    (Sections 2-718 and 2-719).

22
Warranties of quality in PRC Contract Law
  • Requirements
  • Non-compliance of quality requirements
  • If the subject matter delivered by the seller
    fails to comply with the quality requirements,
    the buyer may hold the seller liable for breach
    of contract in accordance with Article 111
    hereof. (Article 155)
  • quality requirements
  • The seller shall deliver the subject matter in
    compliance with the prescribed quality
    requirements. Where the seller gave quality
    specifications for the subject matter, the
    subject matter delivered shall comply with the
    quality requirements set forth therein. (Article
    153)
  • Where the quality requirements for the subject
    matter were not prescribed or clearly prescribed,
    and cannot be determined in accordance with
    Article 61 hereof, Item (i) of Article 62 hereof
    applies.( Article154)

23
Warranties of quality in PRC Contract Law
  • Defect in quality shall be existed at the time of
    delivery
  • The buyer shall be in good faith and without
    gross negligence
  • The buyer shall inspect the object sold and
    seasonally notify the seller
  • Article 157     Inspection upon Receipt of
    Subject MatterUpon receipt of the subject
    matter, the buyer shall inspect it within the
    prescribed inspection period. Where no inspection
    period was prescribed, the buyer shall timely
    inspect the subject matter.
  • The subject matter is not bought from compulsory
    auction.

24
Warranties of quality in PRC Contract Law
  • Where an inspection period was prescribed, the
    buyer shall notify the seller of any
    non-compliance in quantity or quality of the
    subject matter within such inspection period.
    Where the buyer delayed in notifying the seller,
    the quantity or quality of the subject matter is
    deemed to comply with the contract. (Article
    158)    
  • Where no inspection period was prescribed, the
    buyer shall notify the seller within a reasonable
    period, commencing on the date when the buyer
    discovered or should have discovered the quantity
    or quality non-compliance. If the buyer fails to
    notify within a reasonable period or fails to
    notify within 2 years, commencing on the date
    when it received the subject matter, the quantity
    or quality of the subject matter is deemed to
    comply with the contract, except that if there is
    a warranty period in respect of the subject
    matter, the warranty period applies and
    supersedes such two year period.Where the seller
    knew or should have known the non-compliance of
    the subject matter, the buyer is not subject to
    the time limits for notification prescribed in
    the previous two paragraphs. (Article 159)

25
Comparative study of Warranties
26
Warranty of Title
  • UCC 2-312. Warranty of Title and Against
    Infringement  Buyer's Obligation Against
    Infringement.
  • (1) Subject to subsection (2) there is in a
    contract for sale a warranty by the seller that
  • (a) the title conveyed shall be good, and its
    transfer rightful  and
  • (b) the goods shall be delivered free from any
    security interest or other lien or encumbrance of
    which the buyer at the time of contracting has no
    knowledge.

27
Warranty of Title
  • (2) A warranty under subsection (1) will be
    excluded or modified only by specific language or
    by circumstances which give the buyer reason to
    know that the person selling does not claim title
    in himself or that he is purporting to sell only
    such right or title as he or a third person may
    have.
  • (3) Unless otherwise agreed a seller who is a
    merchant regularly dealing in goods of the kind
    warrants that the goods shall be delivered free
    of the rightful claim of any third person by way
    of infringement or the like but a buyer who
    furnishes specifications to the seller must hold
    the seller harmless against any such claim which
    arises out of compliance with the specifications.

28
Express Warranties
  • UCC 2-313. Express Warranties by Affirmation,
    Promise, Description, Sample.
  • (1) Express warranties by the seller are created
    as follows
  • (a) Any affirmation of fact or promise made by
    the seller to the buyer which relates to the
    goods and becomes part of the basis of the
    bargain creates an express warranty that the
    goods shall conform to the affirmation or
    promise.
  • (b) Any description of the goods which is made
    part of the basis of the bargain creates an
    express warranty that the goods shall conform to
    the description.

29
Express Warranties
  • (c) Any sample or model which is made part of the
    basis of the bargain creates an express warranty
    that the whole of the goods shall conform to the
    sample or model.
  • (2) It is not necessary to the creation of an
    express warranty that the seller use formal words
    such as "warrant" or "guarantee" or that he have
    a specific intention to make a warranty, but an
    affirmation merely of the value of the goods or a
    statement purporting to be merely the seller's
    opinion or commendation of the goods does not
    create a warranty.

30
Implied Warranty Merchantability
  • UCC 2-314. Implied Warranty  Merchantability 
    Usage of Trade.
  • (1) Unless excluded or modified (Section 2-316),
    a warranty that the goods shall be merchantable
    is implied in a contract for their sale if the
    seller is a merchant with respect to goods of
    that kind.  Under this section the serving for
    value of food or drink to be consumed either on
    the premises or elsewhere is a sale.
  • (2) Goods to be merchantable must be at least
    such as
  • (a) pass without objection in the trade under the
    contract description  and
  • (b) in the case of fungible goods, are of fair
    average quality within the description  and
  • (c) are fit for the ordinary purposes for which
    such goods are used  and
  • (d) run, within the variations permitted by the
    agreement, of even kind, quality and quantity
    within each unit and among all units involved 
    and
  • (e) are adequately contained, packaged, and
    labeled as the agreement may require  and
  • (f) conform to the promise or affirmations of
    fact made on the container or label if any.
  • (3) Unless excluded or modified (Section 2-316)
    other implied warranties may arise from course of
    dealing or usage of trade.

31
Implied Warranty  Fitness for Particular Purpose
  • UCC 2-315. Implied Warranty  Fitness for
    Particular Purpose.
  • Where the seller at the time of contracting has
    reason to know any particular purpose for which
    the goods are required and that the buyer is
    relying on the seller's skill or judgment to
    select or furnish suitable goods, there is unless
    excluded or modified under the next section an
    implied warranty that the goods shall be fit for
    such purpose.

32
Exclusion of Warranties
  • UCC 2-316. Exclusion or Modification of
    Warranties.
  • (1) Words or conduct relevant to the creation of
    an express warranty and words or conduct tending
    to negate or limit warranty shall be construed
    wherever reasonable as consistent with each
    other  but subject to the provisions of this
    Article on parol or extrinsic evidence (Section
    2-202) negation or limitation is inoperative to
    the extent that such construction is
    unreasonable.
  • (2) Subject to subsection (3), to exclude or
    modify the implied warranty of merchantability or
    any part of it the language must mention
    merchantability and in case of a writing must be
    conspicuous, and to exclude or modify any implied
    warranty of fitness the exclusion must be by a
    writing and conspicuous.  Language to exclude all
    implied warranties of fitness is sufficient if it
    states, for example, that "There are no
    warranties which extend beyond the description on
    the face hereof."

33
Termination of Contract
34
Termination by Agreement
  • The parties may terminate a contract if they have
    so agreed. (PCL art 93I)
  • The parties may prescribe a condition under which
    one party is entitled to terminate the contract.
    Upon satisfaction of the condition for
    termination of the contract, the party with the
    termination right may terminate the contract.
    (PCL art 93II)

35
Termination Prescribed by Law
  • The parties may terminate a contract if(i)    
    force majeure frustrated the purpose of the
    contract(ii)    before the time of performance,
    the other party expressly stated or indicated by
    its conduct that it will not perform its main
    obligations(iii)   the other party delayed
    performance of its main obligations, and failed
    to perform within a reasonable time after
    receiving demand for performance(iv)    the
    other party delayed performance or otherwise
    breached the contract, thereby frustrating the
    purpose of the contract(v)     any other
    circumstance provided by law occurred. (PCL art
    94)

36
Extinction of Right of Termination
  • Where the law or the parties prescribe a period
    for exercising termination right, failure by a
    party to exercise it at the end of the period
    shall extinguish such right.
  • Where neither the law nor the parties prescribe a
    period for exercising termination right, failure
    by a party to exercise it within a reasonable
    time after receiving demand from the other party
    shall extinguish such right. (PCL Article 95)

37
Remedies in Case of Termination
  • Upon termination of a contract, a performance
    which has not been rendered is discharged if a
    performance has been rendered, a party may, in
    light of the degree of performance and the nature
    of the contract, require the other party to
    restore the subject matter to its original
    condition or otherwise remedy the situation, and
    is entitled to claim damages. (PCL Article 97)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)