KINE 3490 Class 3 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

KINE 3490 Class 3

Description:

Prince Philip 'decries the state of fitness in Canada' ... 6); Harmonized Permit Alloc.Policy. Bring any newspaper articles re: sport policy ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: yorkuni
Category:
Tags: kine | class

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: KINE 3490 Class 3


1
KINE 3490 Class 3
  • Policy Development
  • Ethics and Doping in Sport

2
Review
  • The Board of Directors of an incorporated,
    not-for-profit sport organization
  • Is entitled to wages for their work
  • Is elected by the membership
  • Is composed entirely of old people

3
Review
  • The Board of Directors of an incorporated,
    not-for-profit sport organization is always
  • the governance level of the organization
  • the management level of the organization
  • the basement level of the organization

4
(No Transcript)
5
Review
  • According to Stats Can there are 33,649
    not-for-profit sport and recreation organizations
    in Canada. What percentage of these have paid
    employees?
  • 100 of them
  • About 36 of them
  • About 27 of them

6
Review
  • The Canadian Sport Policy was created by
  • The Federal government
  • National Sport Organizations
  • The Federal and Provincial/Territorial
    governments
  • The Jai-alai Players Union

7
Review
  • The Canadian Sport Policy influences
    Canadas sport organizations because
  • It was written by smart people
  • National and Provincial/Territorial Sport
    Organizations get a lot of funding from
    government, so organizations go along with
    government direction
  • Sport Canada approves the Boards of Directors of
    National and Provincial/Territorial Sport
    Organizations, and they pick people that will go
    along with government direction

8
Review
  • There are comparatively few National and
    Provincial/Territorial Sport Organization, and
    thousands of community-level organizations. It is
    the National/Provincial/
  • Territorial organizations that get government
    funding. Explain, then, how the Canadian Sport
    Policy is able to influence Canadas community
    sport organizations?

9
Todays class
  • Ethical issues in sport
  • How public policy has developed to respond to
    ethical issues (especially doping)
  • The Canadian Anti-Doping Strategy
  • Differences between not-for-profit and private,
    for-profit sport responses to the doping issue

10
List the ethical issues in sport
  • Use of performance- enhancing drugs

11
Ethical issues in sport
12
In-class activity!
  • Please line up in order of birth-date, with
    January birthdays on the right, to December
    birthdays on the left.

13
Birth date effect - Effet de date de naissance
14
A brief history of the Canadian Anti-Doping
Strategy and related sport-ethical initiatives
and organizations
15
1959
  • Prince Philip decries the state of fitness in
    Canada
  • Diefenbaker attends Pan Am Games in Chicago -
    impressed with games, but not with Canadas
    performance
  • Canada performs poorly in World Cup Hockey

16
1961
  • Bill C-131 Fitness and Amateur Sport Act enacted
    to encourage both fitness and amateur sport
    development

17
Canadian Sport Early 1970s
  • Establishment of university programs for physical
    education and research
  • Hockey Canada formed
  • National Sport and Recreation Centre
  • ParticipACTION
  • Coaching Association of Canada
  • National Sport Organizations (e.g. Tennis Canada,
    Swim Canada) followed by formation of provincial
    associations over next ten years

18
Provincial/Territorial Governments
  • pre-1961
  • provincial Govts not involved in the provision
    of programs or services
  • post-1961
  • more direct programming involvement
  • infrastructure developed
  • post-1995
  • some devolution of programs and services

19
1988
  • Ben Johnson wins 100m sprint at Seoul Olympics
    he is stripped of gold medal 3 days later due to
    positive doping test (steroids).

20
1988-90
  • Commission of Inquiry Into the Use of Drugs and
    Banned Practices Intended to Increase Athletic
    Performance created by Fed Govt.
  • Ontario Appeal Court Chief Justice Charles Dubin
    appointed to conduct inquiry.
  • Dubin criticizes the testing policies and
    procedures of both the federal government and
    amateur sports associations in his report,
    released in June 1990.

21
The 1990s
  • Canadian Policy Against Doping in Sport (1991).
  • Canadian Centre for Drug-Free Sport (92)
  • Fair Play Canada merges with CCDS to form
    Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport (1995)
  • World Anti-Doping Agency (1999)

22
The 2000s
  • London Declaration by F/P/T Ministers (2001).
  • Creation of True Sport Secretariat (supported by
    CCES) to work on ethical issues in Canadian sport
    (2004)
  • Multiple programs developed by various
    organizations Respect in Sport, Speak Out!,
    Making it SafeR, MARS, Just Play

23
World anti-doping history
  • 1950s and 60s rumors of doping at Olympics
    death of cyclist T Simpson (67)
  • 1968 first Olympic doping test/positive
  • 70s-80s East Germany methodically uses
    steroids on hundreds of unwitting athletes
  • 98-07 Tour de France repeated scandals
  • 1999 WADA formed
  • 2004 World Anti-Doping Code harmonization of
    national efforts updated 09

24
The Canadian Policy Against Doping in Sport
(2004)- analysis
  • What is the policy context for the CPADS?
  • What are the specific issues? (See Purpose)
  • What powers and responsibilities does the Federal
    government have?
  • What power/responsibilities do P/T governments
    have?
  • How does the CPADS apply to sport organizations?
    (By what power?)
  • How does the CPADS apply to individuals?
  • What is the role of CCES?
  • Who monitors the CPADS?
  • Who has authority to revise the CPADS?

25
The Canadian Policy Against Doping in Sport (2004)
  • What could happen if Canada did not have a CPADS
    (or version of it)?
  • Why does the CPADS not apply to professional
    sport organizations? Could it?

26
Professional Sport
27
Anti-doping in Pro sport?
  • Jurisdiction collective bargaining agreement or
    players association (NHL, NBA)
  • NFL introduced policy in 1993
  • MLB introduced policy in 2002
  • NHL testing introduced 2006
  • CFL No policy in place

28
Anti-doping in Pro sport?
  • Penalties for first offence
  • Olympics/WADA/CPADS 2 year ban
  • NFL 4 games suspension without pay
  • MLB 10 days without pay (steroids) 50 games as
    of 2006
  • NBA 5 game suspension/education program
    (steroids)
  • NHL 20 game suspension without pay
  • L. Elaine Halchin. Anti-Doping Policies The
    Olympics and Selected Professional Sports.
    Congressional Research Service Library of
    Congress April 29, 2005.

29
What accounts for the significant difference
between amateur and professional sport?
  • Profit motives
  • Players unions
  • Policy leverage
  • Govt has direct funding leverage over amateur
    sport but little leverage over pro sport

30
The Differences in Policy Development between the
Private and the Public Sector (1)
Public Sector (governments, not-for-profit, crown
corps)
Private Sector (corporations, partnerships)
  • Policy development function (core function of
    government)
  • Strategic planning function (core function of
    business)

31
The Differences in Policy Development between the
Private and the Public Sector (2)
Public Sector (governments, not-for-profit, crown
corps)
Private Sector (corporations, partnerships)
  • Policy issues/ objectives broader, more variable
    (e.g. the functioning of the economy, social
    welfare, education )
  • Policy issues/ objectives have to do with
    positioning the business in the marketplace (e.g.
    revenue targets, new product development, ticket
    sales)

32
The Differences in Policy Development between the
Private and the Public Sector (3)
Public Sector (governments, not-for-profit, crown
corps)
Private Sector (corporations, partnerships)
  • Fewer reliable reference points (cant always
    measure success of policy implementation
  • More reliable reference points (can measure the
    extent to which revenue targets have been reached
    )

33
The Differences in Policy Development between the
Private and the Public Sector (4)
Public Sector (governments, not-for-profit, crown
corps)
Private Sector (corporations, partnerships)
  • Many stakeholders involved in process (policies
    could effect the country, the province or a city)
  • Fewer stakeholders involved (policies will effect
    one company or organization

34
The Differences in Policy Development between the
Private and the Public Sector (5)
Public Sector (governments, not-for-profit, crown
corps)
Private Sector (corporations, partnerships)
  • More time consuming (much consultation during
    process and often many levels of decision-makers
    )
  • Less time consuming (fewer stakeholders with whom
    to consult and fewer decision making levels )

35
The Differences in Policy Development between the
Private and the Public Sector (6)
Public Sector (governments, not-for-profit, crown
corps)
Private Sector (corporations, partnerships)
  • Policy may take the form of a lengthy document or
    a policy statement
  • Policies tend to be brief (less subject to
    scrutiny by the general public)
  • Often not in written form

36
Bigger, Faster, Stronger?
37
"Professional sport is part of the entertainment
industry and not subject to the values of amateur
sport. Professional athletes are adults who earn
their living through sport. It is their right as
consenting adults to participate in doping, if
they understand and agree to the potential harm
it may cause them." Agree or disagree?
38
Policy Development Cycle
CONTEXT STRATEGY
EVALUATION
DEFINE ISSUE
DECISION IMPLEMENTATION
ANALYSIS OPTIONS
CONSULTATION
39
The Policy Alternatives Project Process
  • Form group (5 or 6)
  • Discuss policy interests and organizational
    contacts
  • Identify top 3 choices
  • Approach organization contact(s) and interview
    them re policy needs
  • Identify and agree policy problem and objectives
    for new or revised policy

40
Steps in Policy Alternatives Project
(cont )
  • Obtain cooperation of contact and get pertinent
    documentation
  • Do research (review existing documentation, do
    interviews if necessary)
  • Brainstorm policy alternatives (at least 4-5)
  • Test alternatives with representatives from 3
    different stakeholder groups (3 people)

41
Steps in Policy Alternatives Project
(cont )
  • Based on research, select best case policy
    alternatives (3) describe
  • Identify the strengths and limitations of each
    alternative
  • Make policy recommendation with rationale

42
For next week
  • Policy Analysis Paper Due 230 pm
  • A Community Perspective Who gets to use public
    space?
  • Guest speaker
  • Reading Opening the Doors Hums MacLean (Chap.
    6) Harmonized Permit Alloc.Policy
  • Bring any newspaper articles re sport policy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com