Reconciling Organizational Privileges and Aviation Authority Responsibilities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

Reconciling Organizational Privileges and Aviation Authority Responsibilities

Description:

Reaction from the Floor. Summarized into three general categories: ... Internal risk based models to help decision making. Global integration ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: MTON
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Reconciling Organizational Privileges and Aviation Authority Responsibilities


1
Reconciling Organizational Privileges and
Aviation Authority Responsibilities
2
Major Discussion Points
  • This session discussed three approved design
    organization systems
  • EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA)
  • TCCA Accredited Design Organization (ADO)
  • FAA Certified Design Organization (CDO)
  • Each regulatory body defined their system and
    discussed similarities and differences
  • The three systems are in various stages of
    maturity but all are based on a company and
    regulatory body safety culture.

3
Major Discussion Points
  • Similarities between the three systems
  • Greater focus on process management and system
    oversight
  • Design Organizations responsible for all
    compliance determinations
  • Authority performs project and system oversight
  • Routine projects require little authority
    involvement
  • Suppliers can be incorporated with proper
    oversight
  • Certificate issued by authority

4
Major Discussion Points
Differences between the three systems
5
Major Discussion Points
  • SMS must have an organization behind it. This is
    different from delegation.
  • Knowledge, privileges and competencies go
    together.
  • Rating system with privileges defined.
  • Design organization is 100 responsible for its
    compliance.
  • Quality, safety and compliance go together and
    are embedded in a seamless system.

6
Reaction from the Floor
  • Summarized into three general categories
  • Scope of these design organizations
  • Mandatory or not?
  • Certificated or delegated and does this mean
    findings or showings or both?
  • Culture
  • How do we prepare the regulatory bodies for the
    changes of roles and responsibilities?
  • System oversight vs discrete findings
  • Internal risk based models to help decision
    making
  • Global integration
  • System to system compatibility
  • Production approvals so parts can move between
    systems

7
Outcomes/Additional Ideas
  • All three agencies emphasized that their systems
    are under further review.
  • Feedback from industry through industry
    groups/forums will be considered as these systems
    are further developed.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com