Title: Dynamic Portfolio Strategies
1Dynamic Portfolio Strategies
- Part 4
- Portfolio Choice Strategic Asset Allocation
2Strategic Asset Allocation
- Well now consider the problem of an investor who
would like to save some portion of their current
wealth. - Well limit our attention to two asset classes
- A riskless investment (bonds) with relatively low
returns. - A risky investment (stocks) with relatively high
returns. - The strategic asset allocation problem is to
decide what portion of current wealth to invest
in each class.
3Portfolio Selection
- Investors will form a portfolio from these two
assets. - The return on the portfolio will be a weighted
average of the individual assets simple returns
4Portfolio Returns
- Note
- There is a technical problem here. Weve assumed
that the stock return is lognormal but the
portfolio return is not. - The saved wealth is directly proportional to the
return, and it is not lognormal either. - The portfolio weights must add to 1, but are not
necessarily positive (borrowing and lending of
both the stock and bond are allowed).
5Portfolio Theory - The Markowitz Approach
- Assumptions
- Investors want to buy and hold a portfolio of
risky stocks. - The investors like high expected returns, dont
like high variance (equivalently standard
deviation) and dont care about other aspects of
portfolio return distributions.
6The Mean-Variance Tradeoff
- In the absence of arbitrage opportunities, the
set of returns from all securities gives rise to
an efficient frontier. - The efficient frontier bounds the tradeoffs that
are available between mean and variance by
trading in all securities.
7Mean-Variance Analysis
Efficient mean/ std. dev. tradeoffs
All possible mean/std. dev. tradeoffs
8Mean-Variance Analysis
9Utility
- Investors are typically thought of as being risk
averse - When given the choice between
- a) a riskless payment of 10 and
- b) a 50/50 chance of 20 or 0
- most people choose a).
- This is a consequence of diminishing marginal
utility of wealth.
10Diminishing Marginal Utility
Utility
Low Marginal Utility
High Marginal Utility
Wealth
11Indifference Curves
- If investors have utility functions of a special
type, they only care about mean and variance.
(More on this later.) - Indifference curves define sets of mean-standard
deviation pairs that make an investor equally
well off.
12Indifference Curves
Mean
Higher Utility
Indifference Curves
Standard Deviation
13Combining Utility Theory and Mean-Variance Theory
14Mean-Variance Analysis
- Properties of MV frontier
- Higher mean returns can only be achieved by
increasing portfolio variance. - More risk-tolerant investors will choose higher
variance portfolios but receive higher expected
returns. - These efficient portfolios can be calculated if
we know the covariance matrix. - There are companies who will calculate return
covariances for you (e.g. BARRA)
15Portfolio Separation
- An important result
- all efficient portfolios are a combination of the
same two efficient portfolios! - Implication
- If there were no information issues and investors
cared only about mean and variance, only two
mutual funds would be required to satisfy all
investors stock market demands.
16Mean-Variance Analysis
17Risk-free Borrowing and Lending
- You can expand the efficient set if risk-free
borrowing and lending are possible. - If you invest (1-?) in t-bills and ? in an
efficient portfolio the mean and variance of the
portfolio are
18(No Transcript)
19Efficient Set
Tangency portfolio
20Portfolio Separation
- If there were no information issues and investors
cared only about mean and variance, only t-bills
and one mutual fund (the tangency portfolio)
would be required to satisfy all investors stock
market demands. - Investments in this tangency portfolio and
t-bills dominate all other investments.
21Commonly-used Utility Functions
- The class of power utility functions are commonly
employed for the purposes of determining
portfolio allocations.
22Maximizing Utility
- A formal definition of an investors asset
allocation problem can now be given - In words, the problem is to select the asset mix
that maximizes utility. - The investor will make a tradeoff between risk
and expected return.
23Mean-Variance Preferences
- A useful benchmark is the solution to the problem
of an investor who likes mean but dislikes
variance (note that this is not a utility
function as described above)
24Mean-Variance Preferences
- This investors optimal portfolio is given by
- Note
- S is the Sharpe ratio which is constant for all
portfolios. - The more the investor dislikes variance, the less
is invested in the risky asset.
25Maximizing Utility
- The solution to the portfolio problem in the
power utility case has no convenient form. - If the forecasting horizon is very short, some
convenient approximations may be used. - For longer horizons, numerical solutions can be
constructed.
26Maximizing Utility Numerical Solutions by
Simulation
- The solution to the portfolio choice problem in
the power utility case must solve - This is a non-linear equation in ? to which we
can find an approximate solution using SOLVER in
excel.
27Solution Strategy
- To solve the equation we need to find a
convenient way to form the expectation. - Using a large number of simulated excess returns
(the Zt) we can represent this expectation
arbitrarily accurately with a sum
28Solution Strategy
- The solution to the non-linear equation then
gives an arbitrarily accurate appropriate asset
allocation for the investor - The benefit of this approach is that the effect
of horizon on asset allocation can be examined in
a quantitative way.
29Strategic Asset Allocation Example 1
- Suppose an index has IID return dynamics.
Expected returns are 1 per month with a standard
deviation of 4 per month. The risk-free rate is
a constant .5 per month. Determine an optimal
asset allocation for an investor with power
utility and ? each of (2, 5, 10) if the investing
horizon is - 1 year.
- 5 years.
30Strategic Asset Allocation Example 2
- Suppose an index has return dynamics as given by
the VAR model we studied earlier. Determine an
optimal asset allocation for an investor with
power utility and ? each of (2, 5, 10) if the
investing horizon is - 1 year.
- 5 years.