Title: Gas Dynamics in Galactic Nuclei:
1 Gas Dynamics in Galactic Nuclei Starbursts
and AGN Fueling Eliot Quataert (UC Berkeley) w/
Norm Murray Todd Thompson
Arp 220 w/ HST
NGC 6240 w/ Chandra
2Outline
- Observational Context Ultraluminous Infrared
Galaxies - Eddington-Limited Starbursts
- From the Starburst to the Central AGN ( Back
Again) - Conclusions Future Work
3Ultraluminous Infrared Galaxies (ULIRGs)
- Discovered by IRAS in mid 80s
- LFIR gt 1012 L? gtgt Loptical (dusty)
- Disturbed Morphologies Mergers
- Powered by nuclear starbursts /or obscured AGN
(much debated)
4Ultraluminous Infrared Galaxies (ULIRGs)
Josh Barnes
- Discovered by IRAS in mid 80s
- LFIR gt 1012 L? gtgt Loptical (dusty)
- Disturbed Morphologies Mergers
- Powered by nuclear starbursts /or obscured AGN
(much debated)
also Mihos Hernquist 1996
Mergers ? Angular Momentum Transport ? Nuclear
Activity
5Ultraluminous Infrared Galaxies (ULIRGs)
- High z analogues discovered in abundance in submm
surveys (SCUBA/MAMBO) - Highly obscurbed objects account for a
significant fraction of star formation at z few - Key Phase in Growth of Elliptical Galaxies and
Massive BHs?
Chapman et al. 2004
(e.g., Sanders et al. 1988 Kormendy Sanders
1992)
6Physical Conditions Arp 220
HST Nicmos Image
LFIR 1012 L? Double Nuclei 350 pc apart 2
100 pc scale disks with 109 M? gas
( circumbinary disk) ?gas 10 g/cm2 4000
?MW (optically thick to FIR) ltngt
104 cm-3 vs. ltngtMW 1 cm-3
Sakamoto et al. 1999
7Physical Conditions Arp 220
Radio Emission on FIR-Radio Correlation
Radio SN ? 100 pc scale starbursts with 100
M?/yr
Condon et al. 1991
Individual Radio SN detected w/ VLBI
1 350 pc
Smith, Lonsdale, Diamond
8The Case For Radiation Pressure
?, Teff
Hydro Equil P ?G?2 Pressure supplied by star
formation (probably) (e.g., in normal galaxies,
SN, stellar winds, HII regions, )
9Phydro ?G?2
The Schmidt Law
- For sufficiently large ?,
- Prad ? Phydro the disk
- reaches the Eddington limit
- (and the Schmidt Law breaks down)
- ? 3 g/cm2
- (the inner few 100 pc
- of gas-rich starbursts)
SFR
Kennicutt 1998
?gas
10Radiation Pressure vs. Supernovae
SN stirring radiative losses are strong, but
each SN supplies a momentum ? Mshvsh
to the ISM
Salpeter IMF assuming all SN add constructively
(optimistic) ?
Radiation Pressure Dominates SN for Optically
Thick Starbursts (the inner few 100 pc of
gas-rich starbursts)
11Eddington-Limited Starbursts
?, F
12Opacity
Dust Opacity (T lt 103 K)
13Eddington-Limited Starbursts
?, F
14Radio Sizes of ULIRGs 100s pc
15Number of ULIRGs vs. Inferred Flux
16Inward Bound Towards the Central BH
- Inflow vs. Star Formation Fueling a Central AGN
Requires tinflow lt t - Canonical AGN Disks (e.g., Shakura Sunyaev) are
Gravitationally Unstable, with Toomres Q ltlt 1
outside 0.01-0.1 pc - Hypothesis Star Formation Supports the Disk
Maintains Q 1 - tinflow lt t requires
- Low Star Formation Efficiency (lt 0.1 on pc
scales) - Efficient Angular Momentum Transport (spiral
waves, bars, winds, etc.)
17- Local Disk Model
- Q 1
- P Prad PSN
- (Schmidt Eddington)
Gas Fraction 0.3
Gas Fraction 0.1
Star Formation Efficiency (t?)-1
Gas Surface Density
18Masing Disks
- Q 1 P Prad ?
-
- Similar to conditions required for H2O Masers (n
108-1011 T 500 K), - which are observed on 0.1-1 pc scales in
several local AGN - (e.g., NGC 1068 3079)
19- Global Disk Model
- Q 1
- P PradPSNPgas
- (Schmidt Eddington)
- viscous stress
- (vR 0.1 cs global torque)
- 4.
Accretion Rate
Star Formation Rate
MBH 109 M?
20- Global Disk Model
- Q 1
- P PradPSNPgas
- (Schmidt Eddington)
- viscous stress
- (vR 0.1 cs global torque)
- 4.
Accretion Rate
Star Formation Rate
MBH 109 M?
21Starburst
Reprocessing?
AGN
PREDICTIONS A non-negligible fraction of the FIR
emission in luminous AGN is from star formation
(which is required to stabilize the gas at large
radii) More luminous (gas-rich) systems should
preferentially host AGN (true for ULIRGs)
FIR
UV
22Thickness of the Disk
Midplane Scale-height H/R cs/vrot
23Vertical Structure on pc Scales
- Photosphere is extended
- well off the midplane
- F FEDD ?2cz/?
- ?ph gt ?mid
- Nuclear Obscuration
- (for luminous AGN)?
24Vertical Thickness of the Disk
Photospheric H/R
Hph R at few pc
25NGC 1068 300-800 K dust is resolved with
VLT interferometry on few pc scales
Jaffe et al. 2004
26Feedback from the Central AGN
M(r) 2?2r/G Mg fM
For L gt LM momentum injection is sufficient to
blow away all of the gas in a galaxy
Conjecture LM is an upper limit to the
luminosity of an AGN (or
starburst) systems that reach LM
self-regulate L does not increase further
27The Maximum Luminosity of Quasars
? from width of OIII line in NLR
28Gas Dynamics in Galactic Nuclei
- Eddington-Limited Starbursts in the Inner 100
pc of Galactic Nuclei - Good Agreement w/ ULIRGS
- AGN Fueling tinflow lt t requires rapid
inflow inefficient star formation
plausible models allow AGN to outshine starburst - Global Disk Models Nuclear Obscuration via the
Disks Atmosphere - LM 3x1046 (?/200)4 ergs/s maximum luminosity
of BHs - LBH LM ? MBH-? relation observed in local
galaxies
29Future Work
- The Multiphase ISM from 0.1-100 pc
- radiation pressure dominated molecular clouds,
the intercloud medium, - Efficacy of Gravitational Torques at 1-10 pc
- Masing Disks
- Radiation Hydro Simulations of BH Feedback
- Radiation Pressure Impt. in Local Star-Forming
Regions?