Gas Dynamics in Galactic Nuclei: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Gas Dynamics in Galactic Nuclei:

Description:

Ultraluminous Infrared Galaxies (ULIRGs) Discovered by IRAS in mid 80's ... Key Phase in Growth of Elliptical Galaxies and Massive BHs? Chapman et al. 2004 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: elio49
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gas Dynamics in Galactic Nuclei:


1
Gas Dynamics in Galactic Nuclei Starbursts
and AGN Fueling Eliot Quataert (UC Berkeley) w/
Norm Murray Todd Thompson
Arp 220 w/ HST
NGC 6240 w/ Chandra
2
Outline
  • Observational Context Ultraluminous Infrared
    Galaxies
  • Eddington-Limited Starbursts
  • From the Starburst to the Central AGN ( Back
    Again)
  • Conclusions Future Work

3
Ultraluminous Infrared Galaxies (ULIRGs)
  • Discovered by IRAS in mid 80s
  • LFIR gt 1012 L? gtgt Loptical (dusty)
  • Disturbed Morphologies Mergers
  • Powered by nuclear starbursts /or obscured AGN
    (much debated)

4
Ultraluminous Infrared Galaxies (ULIRGs)
Josh Barnes
  • Discovered by IRAS in mid 80s
  • LFIR gt 1012 L? gtgt Loptical (dusty)
  • Disturbed Morphologies Mergers
  • Powered by nuclear starbursts /or obscured AGN
    (much debated)

also Mihos Hernquist 1996
Mergers ? Angular Momentum Transport ? Nuclear
Activity
5
Ultraluminous Infrared Galaxies (ULIRGs)
  • High z analogues discovered in abundance in submm
    surveys (SCUBA/MAMBO)
  • Highly obscurbed objects account for a
    significant fraction of star formation at z few
  • Key Phase in Growth of Elliptical Galaxies and
    Massive BHs?

Chapman et al. 2004
(e.g., Sanders et al. 1988 Kormendy Sanders
1992)
6
Physical Conditions Arp 220
HST Nicmos Image
LFIR 1012 L? Double Nuclei 350 pc apart 2
100 pc scale disks with 109 M? gas
( circumbinary disk) ?gas 10 g/cm2 4000
?MW (optically thick to FIR) ltngt
104 cm-3 vs. ltngtMW 1 cm-3
Sakamoto et al. 1999
7
Physical Conditions Arp 220
Radio Emission on FIR-Radio Correlation
Radio SN ? 100 pc scale starbursts with 100
M?/yr
Condon et al. 1991
Individual Radio SN detected w/ VLBI
1 350 pc
Smith, Lonsdale, Diamond
8
The Case For Radiation Pressure
?, Teff
Hydro Equil P ?G?2 Pressure supplied by star
formation (probably) (e.g., in normal galaxies,
SN, stellar winds, HII regions, )
9
Phydro ?G?2
The Schmidt Law
  • For sufficiently large ?,
  • Prad ? Phydro the disk
  • reaches the Eddington limit
  • (and the Schmidt Law breaks down)
  • ? 3 g/cm2
  • (the inner few 100 pc
  • of gas-rich starbursts)

SFR
Kennicutt 1998
?gas
10
Radiation Pressure vs. Supernovae
SN stirring radiative losses are strong, but
each SN supplies a momentum ? Mshvsh
to the ISM
Salpeter IMF assuming all SN add constructively
(optimistic) ?
Radiation Pressure Dominates SN for Optically
Thick Starbursts (the inner few 100 pc of
gas-rich starbursts)
11
Eddington-Limited Starbursts
?, F
12
Opacity
Dust Opacity (T lt 103 K)
13
Eddington-Limited Starbursts
?, F
14
Radio Sizes of ULIRGs 100s pc
  • Condon et al. 1991

15
Number of ULIRGs vs. Inferred Flux
16
Inward Bound Towards the Central BH
  • Inflow vs. Star Formation Fueling a Central AGN
    Requires tinflow lt t
  • Canonical AGN Disks (e.g., Shakura Sunyaev) are
    Gravitationally Unstable, with Toomres Q ltlt 1
    outside 0.01-0.1 pc
  • Hypothesis Star Formation Supports the Disk
    Maintains Q 1
  • tinflow lt t requires
  • Low Star Formation Efficiency (lt 0.1 on pc
    scales)
  • Efficient Angular Momentum Transport (spiral
    waves, bars, winds, etc.)

17
  • Local Disk Model
  • Q 1
  • P Prad PSN
  • (Schmidt Eddington)

Gas Fraction 0.3
Gas Fraction 0.1
Star Formation Efficiency (t?)-1
Gas Surface Density
18
Masing Disks
  • Q 1 P Prad ?
  • Similar to conditions required for H2O Masers (n
    108-1011 T 500 K),
  • which are observed on 0.1-1 pc scales in
    several local AGN
  • (e.g., NGC 1068 3079)

19
  • Global Disk Model
  • Q 1
  • P PradPSNPgas
  • (Schmidt Eddington)
  • viscous stress
  • (vR 0.1 cs global torque)
  • 4.

Accretion Rate
Star Formation Rate
MBH 109 M?
20
  • Global Disk Model
  • Q 1
  • P PradPSNPgas
  • (Schmidt Eddington)
  • viscous stress
  • (vR 0.1 cs global torque)
  • 4.

Accretion Rate
Star Formation Rate
MBH 109 M?
21
Starburst
Reprocessing?
AGN
PREDICTIONS A non-negligible fraction of the FIR
emission in luminous AGN is from star formation
(which is required to stabilize the gas at large
radii) More luminous (gas-rich) systems should
preferentially host AGN (true for ULIRGs)
FIR
UV
22
Thickness of the Disk
Midplane Scale-height H/R cs/vrot
23
Vertical Structure on pc Scales
  • Photosphere is extended
  • well off the midplane
  • F FEDD ?2cz/?
  • ?ph gt ?mid
  • Nuclear Obscuration
  • (for luminous AGN)?

24
Vertical Thickness of the Disk
Photospheric H/R
Hph R at few pc
25
NGC 1068 300-800 K dust is resolved with
VLT interferometry on few pc scales
Jaffe et al. 2004
26
Feedback from the Central AGN
M(r) 2?2r/G Mg fM
For L gt LM momentum injection is sufficient to
blow away all of the gas in a galaxy
Conjecture LM is an upper limit to the
luminosity of an AGN (or
starburst) systems that reach LM
self-regulate L does not increase further
27
The Maximum Luminosity of Quasars
? from width of OIII line in NLR
28
Gas Dynamics in Galactic Nuclei
  • Eddington-Limited Starbursts in the Inner 100
    pc of Galactic Nuclei
  • Good Agreement w/ ULIRGS
  • AGN Fueling tinflow lt t requires rapid
    inflow inefficient star formation
    plausible models allow AGN to outshine starburst
  • Global Disk Models Nuclear Obscuration via the
    Disks Atmosphere
  • LM 3x1046 (?/200)4 ergs/s maximum luminosity
    of BHs
  • LBH LM ? MBH-? relation observed in local
    galaxies

29
Future Work
  • The Multiphase ISM from 0.1-100 pc
  • radiation pressure dominated molecular clouds,
    the intercloud medium,
  • Efficacy of Gravitational Torques at 1-10 pc
  • Masing Disks
  • Radiation Hydro Simulations of BH Feedback
  • Radiation Pressure Impt. in Local Star-Forming
    Regions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com