Title: Health Council Model
1Health Council Model
- Recommendations
- from
- The Good Health
- Through Good Governance
- Working Group
- March 21, 2003
2Good Health Through Good Governance Working Group
- Health Council Model Sub-Group
- Richard Alvarez, Carolyn Bennett, Adalstein
Brown, Raisa Deber, Sholom Glouberman, John
Godfrey, Wade Junek, Jan Kasperski, Marion Lyver,
Antony Marcil, Matthew Mendelsohn, Hugh
O'Brodovich, Ray Rupert, Peter Singer, Harvey
Skinner, Brenda Zimmerman, David Zitner - Other Working Group Participants
- Haig Baronikian, Andrew Bevan, Murna Dalton, Theo
D'Hollander, Mary Eberts, Myrna Francis, John
Frank, Brian Gamble, David Heath, David Imrie,
Carol Kushner, Joel Lexchin, John Maxted, Patrick
McNamara, Nancy Miller-Chenier, Tim Murphy,
Gordon Riddle, Janice Gross Stein, Bill Sutton,
Peter Warrian, Bill Young
3 FMM Accord 4 areas to be interpreted/strengthen
ed
- Quebecs Council on Health and Welfare, with a
new mandate, will collaborate with the Health
Council - would monitor and make annual public reports on
the implementation of the Accord, particularly
its accountability and transparency provisions - would publicly report through federal/provincial/
territorial Ministers of Health - would include representatives of both orders of
government, experts and the public
4Recommended interpretation/strengthening
1. Quebecs Council on Health and Welfare, with
a new mandate, will collaborate with the Health
Council. Means that all data will be made
comparable and available and that the mandate of
the national Health Council includes reporting on
the performance of health and health care in a
pan-Canadian manner that includes Quebec.
5Recommended interpretation/strengthening
- 2. Monitor and make annual public reports
- Means that the Council is free to report on
anything relevant to the health of Canadians, not
only that which is explicitly mentioned in the
Health Accord. - 3. Publicly report through FPT Ministers of
Health - Means that a truly independent and trustworthy
Council reports publicly, leaving to the
governments the dissemination of the information
to their constituents.
6Recommended interpretation/strengthening
- 4. Include representatives of both orders of
government, experts and the public - Means that although governments select
representatives, they are not government
officials, elected or non-elected. They are
government nominees who act independently and are
faithful to the terms of reference of the
Council. (as the Council of Maritime Premiers
chooses regional appointees )
7A Vision for a Health Council
- An independent, trusted body that advises
Canadians on the state of their health and on the
performance of their health care system. - The Council earns moral authority by celebrating
excellence, pointing out opportunities for
improvement and by telling the truth. - Makes recommendations, not policy.
- Is more than just our collective conscience.
- The Council asks for good quality data
encourages a learning and a collaborative
culture and promotes on-going dialogue.
8Our Vision (contd)
- All Canadians must know that the Council
- uses information of the same quality and
reputation as that of Statistics Canada - interprets it with the Auditor Generals rigour
- makes recommendations as important as those of
the Bank of Canada and
9Values of the Vision
- All Canadians must see that
- The Health Council of Canada
- has an important
- mediating effect
- on the F/P/T and inter-sectoral tensions that
hinder progress towards an integrated system of
health maintenance and care in which the public
good and cost-effective, world-class results are
paramount.
10Trusted Data (a)
- There must be a separation between the data
gathering (e.g. by CIHI) and
data interpretation by the Council - The Council evaluates, interprets and reports on
the data presented and - makes requests for data (e.g. from CIHI) or for
research (e.g. from CIHR), not currently available
11Trusted Data (b)
- The indicators in Annex A of the Health Accord
are a good roadmap, as long as they evolve and we
add others such as - accessibility to health care in French in ROC
or English in PQ - accessibility to Deaf language interpretation
- access to midwifery care, acupuncture,
complementary care - Measuring the progress of our connectedness in
our health care system, and thereby the ability
to measure as we go, will be imperative to the
overall effectiveness of the Council
12Collaborative Culture
- The Council collaborates with all stakeholders
- The Council is not big brother
- The FG is at the table as the 5th biggest
provider of health care in Canada (Aboriginal
health, military, veterans, and correctional
services) - Inspiration should be taken from the VISA model,
in which inherently competitive institutions
developed a governance structure and common
information and communications technology (ICT)
that is good for the public and the users because
it works and is trustworthy
13Learning Culture
- The Council recognizes the complex nature of
health and health care - The Councils strength comes from its ability to
view health as a complex adaptive system - The Council facilitates the feedback loops that
enable the continuous improvements and the
remediation inherent in a learning culture - The Council turns the measurements of others into
knowledge and suggests changes, the results of
which are measured again.
14Ongoing Dialogue with Canadians
- The Council safeguards Canadians confidence in
health care, a critical goal of a publicly funded
system - The Council maintains a continuous dialogue and
acts upon the concerns and priorities of
Canadians - Council tracks and adapts best practices
worldwide for consulting and engaging civil
society in general, citizens, patients, medical
and public health professionals, wellness and
other practitioners, educators and all other
stakeholders
15Legislative Framework
- Council needs a legislative framework, a clear
terms of reference, significant budget and a
strong secretariat to make optimal use of
Councils decision-making skills - Health Council legislation should replace the
current voluntary framework with compulsory
reporting, adopting Romanows sixth principle,
accountability, without re-opening the CHA
16 Carrots instead of sticks
- The Health Council illuminates opportunities for
improvement and may set appropriate goals - The Council yardsticks are the measures of the
performance of peers - The process of change carries rewards
- The Council hosts annual conferences at which
best practices are announced and presented - The Council grants performance funding for top
tier results, for the most improved, for
innovation, for risk and for diffusion of
methodology
17AppendixPossible Council Structure
- 14 members,
including 7 government nominees - 5 regional, 2 federal
- 1 aboriginal, 3 expert/provider and 3 civil
society - Plus, an eminent Chair/Spokesperson who would be
untouchable in fairness, transparency and
credibility, representing an irrefutable interest
in the public good
18AppendixIllustrative 2nd Table (organizations
providing information and interpretation)
- Assembly of First Nations
- Association of Canadian Medical Colleges
- Canadian Council on Health Services Accreditation
- CIHI, CIHR, CHSRF, CCOHTA
- CMA, CNA, CHA
- College of Family Physicians
- Federation of Medical Licensing Authorities
- Health Charities Council of Canada
- Health Infoway
- Patient Safety Institute
- Royal College
19Appendix Possible Nominating Process
- The provinces and federal government choose a
chair - Aboriginal, Federal and Regional nominees
appointed - This group develops an open and transparent
process for adding the non-governmental
representatives - Caveat - This approach risks losing the
confidence of civil society, practitioners and
professionals unless they are able to select
their own nominees - The legitimacy of the Council hinges on each
community or stakeholder feeling a sense of
ownership of the process of selection and thus,
in the ultimate composition of the Health Council - Overall composition of the council reflects a
balance of expertise, demographics, private
sector, civil society