The Operations Development Challenge a balance of cost and risk PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 14
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Operations Development Challenge a balance of cost and risk


1
The Operations Development Challenge - a balance
of cost and risk
  • Tony Hillman
  • MacDonald, Dettwiler Associates Ltd.

Presentation prepared for the SpaceOps 2004
Conference May 17-21, Montreal, Canada
2
Contents
  • Introduction
  • what is operations development, and why is this
    topic worth consideration?
  • Operations Development as a component of System
    Development
  • project examples of operations development scope,
    key activities in the major system development
    and operations phases, cost drivers, challenges,
    and risk items
  • Development practices with cost and risk
    reduction potential
  • during concept and requirements definition
  • during preliminary and detailed design and
    implementation
  • during system integrationand flight operations
  • Priorities and criteria for launch readiness
  • Some cost and schedule problem mitigation
    measures
  • Summary Conclusions and Recommendations

3
What is Operations Development for a space system
project?
  • A branch of the system engineering activity on
    the project
  • Generally concerns planning and preparation for
    flight operations
  • planning - ops concept document, preparation of
    plans for each mission phase, preparation of
    operations handbook, ...
  • analysis - e.g., orbit acquisition and
    maintenance strategies, .
  • preparation of staff and facilities - training,
    ops inputs to ground segment development, ops
    integration, exercises, ...
  • preparation of operations infrastructure -
    procedures, databases, ...
  • execution/support of operations, e.g., through
    LEOP and system commissioning
  • management - system operations, pre-launch
    planning and preparation, operations contractors,
    network agencies,...
  • Scope clearly depends on the overall program
    scope and on the system delivery requirements
  • delivery in-orbit has greater operations
    development scope than delivery pre-launch

4
Typical Operations Development Activities and
Planning
5
What influences Operations Development costs?
  • System and Project Characteristics
  • System level operations requirements
  • System size and complexity
  • Extent of new development of system components
  • Degree of automation
  • System operation maintenance and support concept
  • Customer needs for training and documentation
  • Organisational transition through development
    phases
  • Operations experience in development team
  • Budgetary constraints
  • Project Risks
  • Unplanned changes to technical baselines and
    project schedules
  • System integration problems impacting pre-flight
    operations preparation
  • In-orbit anomalies and commissioning teething
    troubles delaying transition to routine phase
    operations

6
Some Operations Development Challenges
  • Continual programmatic pressure to find ways to
    reduce development and through-life operations
    costs
  • How to get overall project attention for mission
    support planning, such as provision for flight
    software maintenance over the mission lifetime,
    early enough in development
  • How to co-ordinate operations development across
    a project comprising multi-organisational,
    multi-contractor entities (sometimes fiefdoms!)
  • How to expose operations scope sufficiently early
    in development - to avoid the forgot its ,
    workarounds, and cost growth
  • How to grow and nurture a development team with
    the necessary experience and skills
  • How to conduct the final operations preparation
    campaign in the face of ground segment system
    builds with incremental functionality and
    maturity
  • How to introduce a new mission into a support
    infrastructure without operational impact to an
    existing mission or missions

7
Development Practices - overall
  • Regard operations development as a part of the
    overall system engineering, and later, the system
    integration on the project
  • can act as a multi-disciplinary gluing function
    during development
  • exploit synergies between pre-launch system
    integration test and preparation for flight
    operations
  • Build the cross-organisational, cross-contractual
    needs of operations development into the overall
    project plan and subcontract statements of work
  • Establish and maintain a system operations cost
    model
  • prepare early in development and maintain as the
    design evolves
  • use as a vehicle to discuss status with
    stakeholders and explore cost savings options
  • In the build of operations development team,
    consider
  • participation of experienced personnel from the
    eventual operations and maintenance team -
    facilitates ops team training and injects
    experience for the new mission
  • participation of selected personnel becoming free
    from development tasks -facilitates transfer of
    development knowledge to operations

8
Development Practices - concept and requirements
definition
  • Formulate and document operations concept early
    in development and participate in requirements
    definition and evaluation of system components
  • can use as Ops Concept Document as a precursor to
    operations plans
  • include metrics for operations performance - from
    system requirements or system design allocation
    to operations
  • document key operations characteristics and
    requirements of system components, in particular
    the driving items
  • propagate the operations concept in the system
    design
  • Establish working relationships with in-house and
    supplier organisations
  • define and agree operations deliverables (and
    milestones) for all parties
  • identify operations points of contact within each
    organisation and an interchange mechanism, e.g.,
    operations working group forum, for coordination
    through the project
  • Operations Development planning
  • identify risk areas, such as uncertainties in
    procedures development, and factor mitigation
    approaches into plan
  • define operations development review milestones
    for stakeholder and subject expert review of
    documentation and development status, using
    overall project review milestones, e.g., system
    CDR, and some special ops reviews

9
Development Practices - design and implementation
  • Feed operations needs, expertise, and
    lessons-learned into system and component design
  • reduces chance of fix it later costs
  • achieved through operations staff (development
    and preferably also operations team)
    participation in design reviews, and selected
    design and development activities
  • Work operations plans in parallel with system
    design
  • to level necessary to judge design is complete
  • forms a basis for operations team staffing
    planning and procedures development
  • Develop and focus supplier contributions to
    spacecraft operations handbook, ground segment
    operations maintenance manuals, and training
    preparation
  • need these materials in good shape to avoid
    difficulties and over-runs in procedures
    development and operations integration
  • operations working group can be useful vehicle
    for coordination
  • operations needs and priorities can easily get
    lost where there are supplier hardware delivery
    challenges!

10
Development Practices - system integration and
flight operations
  • Consider integration planning early in
    development and build cost saving measures into
    overall project plan, e.g.,
  • coordinate TM/TC database and Operations Database
    development, testing and operations tuning
    between spacecraft suppliers, ground control
    system suppliers, and operations development, and
    operations teams
  • identify opportunities for pre-launch validation
    with the spacecraft, and maximise synergies
    between spacecraft AIT needs and operations
    development needs
  • Reduce impacts of internal handovers of
    integration responsibilities as far as possible,
    avoiding inefficiencies of parallel staffing and
    multiple knowledge transfers between development
    groups
  • get operations staff involved in ground segment
    integration and test
  • allow for period of Ground Segment usage
    testing, for operations preparation, prior to
    acceptance
  • make the Ground Segment formal testing also serve
    an Operations purpose to signify readiness to
    start the pre-launch simulation campaign
  • Use feedback from flight operations
  • to tune procedures, address staff assignment and
    training issues, and to define system
    enhancements, for improved efficiency
  • establishment and monitoring of system operations
    performance metrics, including costs, helps here

11
Priorities and Criteria for Launch Readiness (1)
  • Ground Segment and Operations qualified for LEOP
    and commissioning operations, and preferably all
    mission phases
  • Operations Readiness Review (ORR)
    agenda/checklist to cover
  • completion of acceptance testing, external
    interface testing, end-to-end system testing
  • completion of verification activities,
    particularly related to satellite control
  • operations procedures and databases validated and
    approved
  • ground system configurations, satellite launch
    configuration, launch-day loads, etc., defined,
    documented in procedures
  • reference design and user documentation approved
    and available for use to support mission, e.g.,
    in anomaly investigations
  • mission simulation campaign complete, has
    included LEOP scenarios involving all TTC sites
  • training and certification program for the
    Operations Team has been completed
  • support arrangements are in place for
    supplementary satellite system personnel,
    subsystem specialists, and ground segment
    personnel for LEOP and commissioning
  • plan for transition of operations direction and
    system management to Routine Phase provisions is
    in place

12
Priorities and Criteria for Launch Readiness (2)
  • ORR agenda/checklist (continued)
  • External TTC network for LEOP and emergency
    support is ready
  • Ground Segment to Satellite testing at the
    Launch-Site has been completed
  • Ground Segment is ready to participate with the
    Launch-Site in launch count-down rehearsal
  • remaining Ground Segment/Operations activities
    and actions prior to launch defined and agreed,
    and not expected to preclude a launch decision
  • Mission risk, and in particular spacecraft
    safety, is the primary concern for Operations
    Development
  • as a minimum the criteria need to address
    readiness for spacecraft control through LEOP and
    steady state operations in commissioning,
    including routine spacecraft maintenance
    activities, and safing and contingency recovery
    provisions
  • lack of preparedness in other areas will likely
    delay the transition to the Routine Phase, or
    reduce initial operations capabilities.

13
What can be done if the cost and schedule going
gets tough?- these days it always tends to be
tough!
14
Summary conclusions and recommendations
  • Best to consider and plan Operations Development
    is an integral component of the overall system
    development in the deployment of a space system
  • exploit system glue function features of Ops
    Development to help system engineering of
    interfaces and end-to-end performance, in to
    assist system requirements allocation and in the
    definition of the Ground Segment tools
  • use Operations Development as a focus for system
    integration
  • Many cost savings measures need to be built into
    the project plan in the early phases
  • operations concept, system architecture choices
  • exploit synergies between needs of operations
    preparation, spacecraft AIT, and Ground Segment
    IT
  • engage the eventual operators in development
    activities and as part of the Ops Development
    team where feasible
  • Despite increasing focus on fiscal constraints,
    mission risk, and in particular spacecraft
    safety, is the primary concern for Operations
    Development
  • cant (shouldnt?) compromise fundamental
    readiness criteria related to spacecraft
    operations
  • some readiness criteria relating to Routine Phase
    system operations can be deferred with the risk
    of post launch delays, and probably extra costs,
    before a full operations capability can be
    achieved
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com