Protecting Public, Educational and Government Channels - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Protecting Public, Educational and Government Channels

Description:

City of Dearborn v. Comcast of Michigan, No. 08 ... Township: Comcast's Plan ... Court issued TRO preventing Comcast from digitizing PEG. Channel locations ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: michelle9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Protecting Public, Educational and Government Channels


1
Protecting Public, Educational and Government
Channels
  • NATOA Spring Conference 2009
  • WASHINGTON, D.C.
  • Joseph Van Eaton
  • May 18, 2009

Download this presentation at www.millervaneaton.
com Miller Van Eaton P.L.L.C. P Washington, D.C
. P San Francisco, CA. P 202-785-0600
2
Key Cases
  • City of Dearborn v. Comcast of Michigan, No.
    08-10156,
  • See esp. Opinion on Motion to Dismiss (E.D.
    Mich. Oct. 3, 2008)
  • In the Matter of Petitions for Declaratory Ruling
    Regarding Public, Educational, and Governmental
    Programming, MB Docket No. 09-13 CSR-8126,
    CSR-8127, CSR-8128

3
Dearborn/Meridian Township Comcasts Plan
  • digitize PEG channels while providing bcast in
    analog
  • move to 900-series channels (not visible at those
    numbers on digital TV)
  • give basic-only subs one free box/1 year sell
    up all others
  • Effect PEG goes dark for subs with analog sets
    unless subs pay more
  • Effect channels hard to find on every set

4
Comcasts Plan the Response
State law preempts says nothing re PEG
  • Local franchises prevent channel changes/require
    PEG on basic
  • Fed law requires PEG on basic
  • PEG not on basic if viewed as a different product
    by the consumer
  • Fed law also requires operator to transmit PEG
    signals so every sub can get them unless we
    agree otherwise
  • Fed law also prohibits op from exercising
    editorial control over PEG (531(e))
  • pricing
  • location
  • content

No basic if there is eff. competition (543(b)(7))
PEG was on basic!
Fed law does not set substantive standards for
PEG
5
Comcasts Plan the Response
Cable Act (531(c)) preempts existing franchises
enforceable! Silence does not give operator
authority
  • Our local franchises prevent channel
    changes/require PEG on basic
  • Fed law also requires PEG on basic
  • PEG not on basic if it would be viewed as a
    different product by the consumer
  • Operator required to transmit our signals so
    every sub can get them unless we agree
    otherwise
  • Operator cannot exercise editorial control over
    our channels (531(e))
  • pricing
  • location
  • content

Send issue to FCC!
Send issue to FCC!
Disagree
Disagree
6
Dearborn/Meridian Township Result
  • Court issued TRO preventing Comcast from
    digitizing PEG
  • Channel locations cannot change
  • Seven questions sent to FCC for determination

7
ATT Channel 99 Platform
  • An application not a channel
  • Hard to access/surf
  • Hard to find local programming
  • Lower quality
  • Encoded/decoded differently
  • Missing
  • secondary audio
  • closed captioning
  • ability to record
  • ACM, NATOA Chapters, Community Colleges, several
    cities file at FCC

8
Petitions filed at FCC
Open captioning OK
  • Channel 99 violates closed captioning rules.
  • Channel 99 does not provide a channel within
    meaning of Cable Act
  • Channel 99 not consistent with technical
    standards rules applicable to cable systems
  • ATT engaged in unlawful censorship (531(e)) by
    stripping content from PEG
  • Cable Act requires non-discriminatory treatment
    of PEG channels

Were not a cable op!
Old rules silly
Censorship rules not aimed at this
Non-discrim not required no real fed standards
9
Status of Petition
  • ATT petitions consolidated with Dearborn
    referral
  • FCC sought public comment (over 500 submissions)
  • Now awaiting decision from FCC
  • Key an FCC decision ASAP
  • change re-education
  • re-education more costs

10
Immediate Significance
  • May determine whether ATT is a cable system
  • May determine what federal standards apply to PEG
    under existing law
  • May indicate whether FCC can protect PEG
  • May set stage for challenges, changes, to state
    laws

11
Cases Underline
  • In digital environment, quality, accessibility,
    functionality can vary from channel to channel
  • State laws limiting local franchising authority
    were not designed to deal with digital world
  • Ops can be expected to exercise control over
    infrastructure to overcome bandwidth problems
    at public expense
  • Need for a broadband policy that ensures a funded
    green space for the public
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com