Title: Protecting Public, Educational and Government Channels
1Protecting Public, Educational and Government
Channels
- NATOA Spring Conference 2009
- WASHINGTON, D.C.
- Joseph Van Eaton
- May 18, 2009
Download this presentation at www.millervaneaton.
com Miller Van Eaton P.L.L.C. P Washington, D.C
. P San Francisco, CA. P 202-785-0600
2Key Cases
- City of Dearborn v. Comcast of Michigan, No.
08-10156,
- See esp. Opinion on Motion to Dismiss (E.D.
Mich. Oct. 3, 2008)
- In the Matter of Petitions for Declaratory Ruling
Regarding Public, Educational, and Governmental
Programming, MB Docket No. 09-13 CSR-8126,
CSR-8127, CSR-8128
3Dearborn/Meridian Township Comcasts Plan
- digitize PEG channels while providing bcast in
analog
- move to 900-series channels (not visible at those
numbers on digital TV)
- give basic-only subs one free box/1 year sell
up all others
- Effect PEG goes dark for subs with analog sets
unless subs pay more
- Effect channels hard to find on every set
4Comcasts Plan the Response
State law preempts says nothing re PEG
- Local franchises prevent channel changes/require
PEG on basic
- Fed law requires PEG on basic
- PEG not on basic if viewed as a different product
by the consumer
- Fed law also requires operator to transmit PEG
signals so every sub can get them unless we
agree otherwise
- Fed law also prohibits op from exercising
editorial control over PEG (531(e))
- pricing
- location
- content
No basic if there is eff. competition (543(b)(7))
PEG was on basic!
Fed law does not set substantive standards for
PEG
5Comcasts Plan the Response
Cable Act (531(c)) preempts existing franchises
enforceable! Silence does not give operator
authority
- Our local franchises prevent channel
changes/require PEG on basic
- Fed law also requires PEG on basic
- PEG not on basic if it would be viewed as a
different product by the consumer
- Operator required to transmit our signals so
every sub can get them unless we agree
otherwise
- Operator cannot exercise editorial control over
our channels (531(e))
- pricing
- location
- content
Send issue to FCC!
Send issue to FCC!
Disagree
Disagree
6Dearborn/Meridian Township Result
- Court issued TRO preventing Comcast from
digitizing PEG
-
- Channel locations cannot change
- Seven questions sent to FCC for determination
7ATT Channel 99 Platform
- An application not a channel
- Hard to access/surf
- Hard to find local programming
- Lower quality
- Encoded/decoded differently
- Missing
- secondary audio
- closed captioning
- ability to record
- ACM, NATOA Chapters, Community Colleges, several
cities file at FCC
-
8Petitions filed at FCC
Open captioning OK
- Channel 99 violates closed captioning rules.
- Channel 99 does not provide a channel within
meaning of Cable Act
- Channel 99 not consistent with technical
standards rules applicable to cable systems
- ATT engaged in unlawful censorship (531(e)) by
stripping content from PEG
- Cable Act requires non-discriminatory treatment
of PEG channels
Were not a cable op!
Old rules silly
Censorship rules not aimed at this
Non-discrim not required no real fed standards
9Status of Petition
- ATT petitions consolidated with Dearborn
referral
- FCC sought public comment (over 500 submissions)
- Now awaiting decision from FCC
- Key an FCC decision ASAP
- change re-education
- re-education more costs
10Immediate Significance
- May determine whether ATT is a cable system
-
- May determine what federal standards apply to PEG
under existing law
- May indicate whether FCC can protect PEG
- May set stage for challenges, changes, to state
laws
11Cases Underline
- In digital environment, quality, accessibility,
functionality can vary from channel to channel
- State laws limiting local franchising authority
were not designed to deal with digital world
- Ops can be expected to exercise control over
infrastructure to overcome bandwidth problems
at public expense
- Need for a broadband policy that ensures a funded
green space for the public