Cotswold - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Cotswold

Description:

AGW require plan showing full implementation by Sept, headlines: ... Features case studies of visual improvements for staff, including quotations and photos ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: june2
Category:
Tags: cotswold

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cotswold


1
Cotswold Vale PCT
  • BOARD MEETING
  • 14th June 2005
  • NATIONAL WORKFORCE INITIATIVES

2
Agenda for Change ? Overview ?
Process ? Timescales ? Budget ?
Progress ? Risks ? Next Steps
3
Agenda for Change Brief Overview ? New pay
system ? Equalise arrangements ? Harmonise
terms and conditions ? Opportunity to clarify
current jobs ? Increase scope to create new
roles ? Improve link between career and pay
progression ? Applies all staff (except
doctors, dentists and directors)
4
  • Agenda for Change Process
  • Jobs descriptions (JDs) completed by staff
    signed off by manager
  • JDs considered by matching panels
  • Aim to match to national profiles/new pay bands
  • Panels (min 3) consist of mix of staff and
    staff side representatives
  • Process completed 2 or 3 times if panel fail to
    agree
  • JDs then put through job evaluation to assess
    size/pay band
  • Consistency checks with other results within
    PCT/across AGW
  • Notification to payroll triggers transfer to
    new system
  • Assessment of costs
  • Communication to individual
  • Knowledge and Skills Framework (KSF) outline
    agreed

5
  • Agenda for Change Timescales
  • All staff assimilated by September 2005
  • KSFs agreed by October 2005
  • AGW monitor progress against key milestones
    monthly

6
  • Agenda for Change Budget
  • 500k over 2 years (2004/05 and 2005/06) for
    increases to paybill
  • 60k to help with implementation costs

7
  • Agenda for Change Progress
  • -
  • ? Competent project team ? Behind AGW/DoH
    targets
  • ? Comprehensive plan ? Struggling to
    forecast costs
  • ? Effective Steering Group ? Lack of resource
    for KSF
  • ? Focus on fewer JDs to cover groups ? Havent
    seen any benefits
  • ? Adopting county-wide approaches ? Weekly
    reporting required by AGW
  • ? Great working relations with staff side
  • ? Tremendous support for volunteers
  • ? Excellent communications

8
(No Transcript)
9
  • Agenda for Change Risks
  • ? Fail to meet targets
  • ? Exceed budget
  • ? Focus on mechanistic process
  • ? Create further pay and policy anomalies
  • ? KSF work not started urgently needs resource
  • ? Expectation high potential to really damage
    morale

10
Agenda for Change Next Steps
  • AGW require plan showing full implementation by
    Sept, headlines-
  • Must finalise outstanding JDs on phased basis
    by end June
  • Need to increase no of matching panels
  • Next 10-12 weeks need 4 dedicated panellists
  • Will also need further 4 people for up to 4 weeks
    for Job Evaluation jobs that fail matching
  • Panellists to come from list of volunteers will
    impact on HR and Ops
  • Need to appoint KSF project manager additional
    temporary post
  • Steering Group to monitor plan on a fortnightly
    basis with regular updates to the Board would
    recommend NED representative
  • Need to continue to work in partnership with
    staff side
  • Estimate additional costs c100k above budget of
    60k

11
  • Improving Working Lives (IWL)
  • Overview
  • Process
  • Timescales
  • Budget
  • Progress
  • Risks
  • Next Steps

12
  • IWL Overview
  • An accreditation scheme for NHS employers
  • Measures us against a set of employment
    standards
  • Encourages balance between work and home lives
  • Ensures staff are valued, trained, developed and
    supported regardless of working pattern
  • Different levels of accreditation
  • Practice level achieved January 2004
  • Practice Plus must be achieved by March 2006
  • Have to prove we match the ethos of IWL its
    more than policies

13
  • IWL Practice Plus Accreditation Process
  • Trusts must achieve accreditation by March 2006
  • Key standards assessed -
  • ? Human Resources and Strategy Management
  • ? Equality and Diversity
  • ? Communication and staff involvement
  • ? Healthy Working
  • ? Training and Development
  • ? Flexible Working
  • ? Staff Benefits and Childcare

14
Improving Working Lives Progress
  • Revised Steering Group broad representation
    chaired by Martin Freeman, PEC/GP
  • Prioritised action plan drawn up from Practice
    Assessment, ILW and national staff opinion
    surveys
  • Detailed self-assessment submitted to AGW in
    March 2005 encouraging feedback
  • Agreed theme for story board required to show
    assessors our IWL journey to be used to raise
    awareness across the PCT

15
IWL Story Board
Progress illustrated by a stick man who gathers
friends and more equipment along the way
Based on the Cotswold Way
Features case studies of visual improvements for
staff, including quotations and photos
16
  • IWL Key Issues
  • Tremendous progress hugely dependent on small
    group of people
  • Comprehensive plan overly reliant on policy
    and strategies - ultimately its what staff think
  • Central communications good need to get teams
    talking about IWL
  • Accreditation could be within our grasp but
    opportunity cost of time and investment (no
    budget)
  • Need to hold focus groups logistics, cost and
    enthusiasm
  • Need to compile documented evidence
  • Unclear how much GP practices will need to be
    included

17
  • IWL Key Risks
  • Training and Development
  • Fail to invest in training and development
  • Fail to complete appraisals
  • Fail to implement KSF/A4C
  • HR Strategy and Management
  • Fail to effectively link workforce strategy
    and planning with
  • service delivery and change
  • Latest opinion survey results
  • Significantly low scores in key areas

18
Improving Working Lives Next Steps
  • Steering Group to continue to direct action and
    monitor progress
  • Increased communications activity linked to
    story board
  • Use team meeting structure to obtain focus group
    feedback
  • Formal assessment due October 2005 results
    December
  • Further Board presentation in September to
    determine if PCT ready to proceed with formal
    assessment
  • Note PCT can only delay until March 2006 latest

?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com