Title: Cosmogenicnuclide burial dating of PlioPleistocene sediments an introduction
1Cosmogenic-nuclide burial dating of
Plio-Pleistocene sediments -- an
introduction Greg Balco, John Stone University
of Washington Carrie Jennings Patterson Minnesota
Geological Survey Acknowledgements DOSECC,
Fannie and John Hertz Foundation, Geological
Society of America, NSF EAR-0207844
2 Useful range of radiocarbon dating
Lava Creek ash -- 0.61 Myr
Bishop ash -- 0.74 Myr
Brunhes/Matuyama reversal -- 0.78 Myr
millions of years B.P.
Mesa Falls ash -- 1.2 Myr
Huckleberry Ridge ash - 2.0 Myr
3Burial dating 1 production of 26Al, 10Be
- Nuclides produced in quartz grains by cosmic-ray
bombardment of Si, O nuclei - Production rate variable with altitude, latitude
- Production ratio fixed
- R26/10 6.1
4Burial dating 2 sediment burial
- Cosmic-ray flux decreases exponentially with
depth below the surface. - If a previously exposed target (rock surface,
sediment, whatever) is buried, nuclide production
ceases -- nuclide inventory decays to whatever
level is supported by the (much lower) production
rate at depth.
5Burial dating 3 the 26Al/10Be ratio
t1/2 (26Al) 0.705 Myr t1/2 (10Be) 1.5 Myr
exposure
burial
6Initial surface exposure
7Initial exposure, followed by deep burial
8Initial exposure, followed by shallow burial
9Applications --
1. simplest -- surface exposure followed by deep
burial
Fluvial sediment in caves -- cf. work of Darryl
Granger et al.
Fluvial sediment deposited in deep lakes
10Applications --
2. More complicated, but more versatile --
surface exposure followed by shallow burial, a
sequence of burial, or gradual burial
till
paleosol
Accretionary alluvial deposits -- gradual burial
Glacial deposits -- sequence of instantaneous
burials by thick tills
11Review of critical assumptions --
- So in order to get the right burial age --
- Initial nuclide concentrations on simple exposure
line - 2. Continuous burial from the event that were
trying to date until the present -- no
re-exposure (i.e., sample from drillcore) - 3. Some information about the burial history
that can be used to select a simplifying model.
Single instantaneous burial? Gradual burial at
constant accumulation rate? Series of progressive
burials? - Summary the geologic context of the samples is
really important.
12AMS measurement and error
Accelerator mass spectrometer
Precision 10Be - 3 26Al - 5 26Al/10Be -
6 Age in years - 8-10
13Example Fisher Valley, Utah
14Results --Fisher Valley, Utah
15Example - early/middle Pleistocene glacial
sequence, SW Minnesota
16Results -- hole UMRB-1, SW Minnesota
17Whoops! -- results from modern fluvial sediment
18Summary --
- This technique works pretty well for dating
otherwise difficult Pleistocene sediments.
Especially applicable to material in drillcore --
guaranteed no re-exposure. We expect learning
quite a lot about the timing of Pleistocene
glaciations, in particular, as the technique
develops. - The geologic/geomorphic context, the sediment
source, and the burial history of whatever you
want to date are really important.