Cosmogenicnuclide burial dating of PlioPleistocene sediments an introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Cosmogenicnuclide burial dating of PlioPleistocene sediments an introduction

Description:

Cosmogenic-nuclide burial dating of Plio-Pleistocene sediments -- an introduction ... Burial dating 1: production of 26Al, 10Be ... Burial dating 2: sediment burial ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:144
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: johns76
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cosmogenicnuclide burial dating of PlioPleistocene sediments an introduction


1
Cosmogenic-nuclide burial dating of
Plio-Pleistocene sediments -- an
introduction Greg Balco, John Stone University
of Washington Carrie Jennings Patterson Minnesota
Geological Survey Acknowledgements DOSECC,
Fannie and John Hertz Foundation, Geological
Society of America, NSF EAR-0207844
2
Useful range of radiocarbon dating
Lava Creek ash -- 0.61 Myr
Bishop ash -- 0.74 Myr
Brunhes/Matuyama reversal -- 0.78 Myr
millions of years B.P.
Mesa Falls ash -- 1.2 Myr
Huckleberry Ridge ash - 2.0 Myr
3
Burial dating 1 production of 26Al, 10Be
  • Nuclides produced in quartz grains by cosmic-ray
    bombardment of Si, O nuclei
  • Production rate variable with altitude, latitude
  • Production ratio fixed
  • R26/10 6.1

4
Burial dating 2 sediment burial
  • Cosmic-ray flux decreases exponentially with
    depth below the surface.
  • If a previously exposed target (rock surface,
    sediment, whatever) is buried, nuclide production
    ceases -- nuclide inventory decays to whatever
    level is supported by the (much lower) production
    rate at depth.

5
Burial dating 3 the 26Al/10Be ratio
t1/2 (26Al) 0.705 Myr t1/2 (10Be) 1.5 Myr
exposure
burial
6
Initial surface exposure
7
Initial exposure, followed by deep burial
8
Initial exposure, followed by shallow burial
9
Applications --
1. simplest -- surface exposure followed by deep
burial
Fluvial sediment in caves -- cf. work of Darryl
Granger et al.
Fluvial sediment deposited in deep lakes
10
Applications --
2. More complicated, but more versatile --
surface exposure followed by shallow burial, a
sequence of burial, or gradual burial
till
paleosol
Accretionary alluvial deposits -- gradual burial
Glacial deposits -- sequence of instantaneous
burials by thick tills
11
Review of critical assumptions --
  • So in order to get the right burial age --
  • Initial nuclide concentrations on simple exposure
    line
  • 2. Continuous burial from the event that were
    trying to date until the present -- no
    re-exposure (i.e., sample from drillcore)
  • 3. Some information about the burial history
    that can be used to select a simplifying model.
    Single instantaneous burial? Gradual burial at
    constant accumulation rate? Series of progressive
    burials?
  • Summary the geologic context of the samples is
    really important.

12
AMS measurement and error
Accelerator mass spectrometer
Precision 10Be - 3 26Al - 5 26Al/10Be -
6 Age in years - 8-10
13
Example Fisher Valley, Utah
14
Results --Fisher Valley, Utah
15
Example - early/middle Pleistocene glacial
sequence, SW Minnesota
16
Results -- hole UMRB-1, SW Minnesota
17
Whoops! -- results from modern fluvial sediment
18
Summary --
  • This technique works pretty well for dating
    otherwise difficult Pleistocene sediments.
    Especially applicable to material in drillcore --
    guaranteed no re-exposure. We expect learning
    quite a lot about the timing of Pleistocene
    glaciations, in particular, as the technique
    develops.
  • The geologic/geomorphic context, the sediment
    source, and the burial history of whatever you
    want to date are really important.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com