Cable vs. Satellite - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Cable vs. Satellite

Description:

CRTC regulation of 80% Canadian ownership makes Direct TV's signals illegal ... Direct TV must use Canadian satellites to beam to Canadian homes ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:128
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: Froh
Category:
Tags: cable | direct | satellite | tv

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cable vs. Satellite


1
Cable vs. Satellite
  • The Role of the CRTC

2
Telesat Canada
  • A Canadian public corporation formed in 1969 to
    deliver satellite services to Canadians
  • ownership
  • 51 Canadian federal government
  • 49 Canadian telephone monopoly (Bell Canada)
  • No development for a decade
  • Federal government does not challenge interests
    of telephone companies

3
Cancom
  • CRTC rules (early 80s) that TV signals be made
    available to remote regions of Canada
  • Cancom Consortium of four private Canadian
    broadcasters formed in 1981
  • André Bureau becomes president in January 1983
  • Telesat satellites are used to send TV signals to
    regions of Canada beyond reach of cable
  • Company loses money immediately
  • Offers only four TV stations (3 English, 1
    French) eight radio stations (in 1983, 31
    policy)
  • 500,000 monthly revenue 2 million monthly
    expenses in 1984

4
CRTC Cable
  • In 1980s, cable had 60 penetration of Canadian
    households
  • CRTC strategy is to deliver universal service via
    private broadcasters (Cancom)
  • Establishes a pro-cable regulatory paradigm
  • Cancom uses Telesat Canada satellites
  • Sends TV to cable systems (cable companies become
    Cancoms customers)
  • Direct to home (DTH) signals could be sent only
    beyond cables reach
  • Cable customers provide revenue flow
  • André Bureau becomes Chair of CRTC in October
    1983

5
Death Stars
  • Direct TV a US satellite TV service
  • In direct competition with cable services
  • Benefits from 1992 FCC ruling preventing cable
    operators from withholding channels under their
    control from satellite competitors
  • Canadian cable companies lobby CRTC in response
    to death star threat
  • Direct broadcast satellite (DBS) service can beam
    signals all over North America
  • Ted Rogers sings the blues

6
CRTC Death Stars
  • CRTC regulation of 80 Canadian ownership makes
    Direct TVs signals illegal
  • Canadian-owned Power Corporation Direct TV form
    Power Direct TV
  • 80 owned by Power Corp.
  • 20 by Direct TV

7
CRTC Death Stars
  • Threat of competition to cable
  • BCE WIC (Western International Communications)
    talk to Power Direct
  • CRTC response
  • BCE WIC licenses will not be renewed if talks
    continue
  • Direct TV must use Canadian satellites to beam to
    Canadian homes
  • Threat of more regulatory action

8
Death Stars Cable
  • Cable Co.s strategy
  • Develop a wholly cable-owned DTH satellite
    company
  • DTH Canada created in 1994
  • Controlled by cable companies (Rogers, Shaw)
  • CRTC forces minority ownership on BCE WIC
  • CRTC exempts DTH Canada from licensing fees
  • Regulation no fees for companies using only
    Canadian satellites
  • DTH uses Telesat satellites

9
The Dust Settles
  • Anti-trust investigation forces Rogers Shaw out
    of DTH Canada
  • BCE and WIC gain control of the company
  • DTH morphs into ExpressVu
  • Anti-competitive regulation by CRTC forces Power
    Direct TV out of Canadian satellite business

10
Canadian Satellite Service
  • ExpressVu
  • Controlled by telephone industry
  • Cancom
  • Controlled by cable industry
  • Star Choice
  • What was the role of the State?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com