Title: Innovation, Improvement, Involvement
1Innovation, Improvement, Involvement
- Scratching the surface
- symptom control in chronic kidney disease
- Emma Murphy, Fliss Murtagh Neil Sheerin
2Aims and limits of this talk
- To present the evidence on management of symptoms
in CKD - Highlight the magnitude of symptoms in CKD
- - prevalence, severity, and aetiology
- Case discussion
- Focuses on those patients with GFRnot on dialysis
- Evidence in these populations is extremely
limited some extrapolated from other populations
3Patient quotes
- Ive waited 20 years for someone to talk to me
about symptoms - Of course I understand that I cannot be cured of
my kidney disease but I am now able to cope with
my condition - If clinicians cannot innovate and increase the
hours on dialysis, the only effective alternative
is symptom management. Without either, for most
patients, there is no QOL, and for many, there is
little reason to live - I know it was the right decision not to start
dialysis but I have had all this time with
improved quality of life
4Staff quotes
- More of a cross over is important palliative
care not just for the end but for earlier
symptoms too - If we could refer more people for symptom
control it would be a great help - Better management of pain has really helped
- You may have known patient for 20yrs, like
familyso distressing when you dont know what to
do about their symptoms - Both medical and nursing staff not equipped to
do so..we are just not good at pain - Palliative care is like the golden ticket they
know what to do!!
5What do CKD patients think is important in
end-of-life care?
- Good symptom control
- Avoiding inappropriate prolongation
- Sense of control (information, involvement,
self-determination) - Relieving burden
- Strengthening relationships1
-
- 1Singer 1998 1999
6So how common are symptoms
- ..in conservatively managed
- patients?
- .in patients discontinuing dialysis?
7Systematic review of studies reporting symptom
prevalence
- in conservatively managed patients
- - no evidence
- in dialysis patients
- - 62 studies
- .in patients discontinuing dialysis
- - 1 study
8(No Transcript)
9No of symptoms experienced by each patient
(median, mean, and range)
10(No Transcript)
11Conclusions on symptom prevalence
- More than 1 in 3 conservatively-managed patients
will have - poor mobility, fatigue/weakness, pain, pruritus,
poor appetite, dyspnoea, difficulty sleeping,
drowsiness, constipation, feeling anxious,
restless legs - End of life
- Pain 42, agitation 30, myoclonus 26, dyspnoea
25, nausea 131 - 1Prospective study of 131
patients. Cohen 2000) -
12Symptom control challenging
- Symptoms often from co-morbidity not renal
disease - Regular detailed and proactive assessment for
symptoms important - CKD stage 4-5 itself constrains use of medication
- avoid
- modified (reduction in dose and/or frequency)
- still dialysing or not
13Pain
- Often believed that patients with ESRD have few
symptoms and that dying with ESRD is relatively
symptom free - Good evidence that symptoms are both
under-recognised and under-treated1,2
- 1Davison
2003, 2DOPPS 2004
14Causes of pain
- Often from co-morbid conditions
- Ischaemic pain from peripheral vascular disease
- Neuropathic pain from peripheral neuropathy
- Bone pain from eg osteoporosis
- Musculo-skeletal pain
- Angina1
- 1Davison 2003
15Causes of pain
- Less commonly related to renal disease
- Bone pain from renal osteodystrophy
- Cyst pain in polycystic kidney disease
- Rarely calciphylaxis1
-
1Davison 2003 -
16Management of pain
- Depends on the stage of CKD
- eGFR
- Identify cause of each pain
- Remove reduce cause where possible
17Pharmacological approach
- WHO analgesic ladder (WHO 1986) devised for
cancer pain, but provides - - a systematic and logical approach
- - As with cancer, cause of pain can rarely be
removed - The WHO three step analgesic ladder leads to
effective pain relief in haemodialysis patients1 - 1Barakzoy
Moss 2006
18(No Transcript)
19Management of pain - opioids
- Opioids undergo hepatic metabolism to inactive
and active metabolites - Majority of metabolites excreted by the kidneys
- Are metabolites toxic, do they accumulate and do
they cross the BBB?
20Morphine or diamorphine should it be used when
eGFR
YES Readily available Familiar with use - NO
- The evidence strongly suggests not
- Significant risk of excess sedation and
respiratory depression - Prolonged adverse effects
- Better alternative drugs available
21Fentanyl should it be used when eGFR no dialysis?
- YES
- Safer than morphine
- No toxic metabolites
- Most evidence for safe use
- NO
- 10 drug excreted renally
- Accumulation may occur
- ? Ease of use and availability
22Alfentanil should it be used at end of life
when eGFR
NO Expensive May not be available Break-through pain a problem as short-acting- YES
- Least likely to cause toxicity
- Good if toxic side-effects develop with other
opioids
23(No Transcript)
24(No Transcript)
25(No Transcript)
26(No Transcript)
27What to use in mobile out-patients?(end of
life management discussed later)
28(No Transcript)
29(No Transcript)
30Commonly asked questions
- ? Gabapentin
- - Problematic in eGFR
- Eliminated entirely by renal excretion of
unchanged drug renal clearance directly
proportional to creatinine clearance - Risk of neurotoxcity and myoclonus
- What do we use for break through pain?
31Management at end of life
- Agitation and restlessness
- Respiratory tract secretions
- Pain
32Management of terminal restlessness and agitation
- Midazolam
- - Accumulates in renal failure
- - Risk of excess sedation
- Midazolam 1.25 - 2.5mg PRN (can be used up to
hourly, but rarely needed this often) - If CSCI required 5-10mg
33Pain at the end of life
- fentanyl sc injection first choice, 25 micrograms
3-4 hourly - Volume issues likely to arise with fentanyl BUT
renal patients dont generally require high doses - If dose requirements are high ( about fentanyl
500mcg/24hours), then may need to switch to
alfentanil - - fentanyl 200mcg sc alfentanil 1mg sc
- - fentanyl 25 mcg morphine 2 mg
- Note alfentanil 100-200 micrograms is NOT
optimal for prn doses (only lasts 1-2 hours)
34Management of respiratory tract secretions
- Glycopyrronium
- 0.2 mg PRN
- 0.6-2.4mg in CSCI if symptoms require
- Hyoscine butylbromide
- 20mg PRN
- 40mg-120mg in CSCI if symptoms require
Hyoscine hydrobromide may cause drowsiness
35Mr JK
- 55yrs old
- Chronic kidney disease stage 5 secondary to
diabetic nephropathy - IDDM complications - nephropathy, retinopathy
neuropathy - Metastatic prostate carcinoma diagnosed late
2004. - PSA 900 on diagnosis, then dropped but has been
rising again despite Zoladex - Now hormone refractory
- Recent Ix (CT bone scans) confirm bone
metastases
36Case of Mr JK
- Already aware of poor prognosis
- (advised
- Opted for conservative management
- No planned oncology follow up
- Attending renal palliative clinic
- Keen to discuss symptoms and future
- Serum creatinine now 420, urea 27 (eGFR 14mls/min)
37Case of Mr JK
- C/o severe pain in left lower limb
- aching over his anterolateral thigh lateral leg
- severity 8/10 at worst
- exacerbated by sitting, walking and hip or knee
extension - C/o severe pain in right shoulder
- aching in nature and radiates all the way down
his right arm to his wrist. He grades this pain 7
out of 10 and it is exacerbated by lying down. - Rx Co-codamol maximum dose
- little benefit
- well tolerated
- reduces pain by only 20
38- How would you assess and manage his pain?
- What are the possible causes of his pain?
39Case of Mr JK
- He sleeps poorly largely due to his pain
- His sleep is particularly interrupted by a
stabbing pain in his left forefoot which occurs
at night but is not helped by sitting out and
lowering his leg -
- He is known to have calcified vessels on recent
Doppler scans.
40- What might be causing his pain?
- What other treatment would you consider to
relieve his pain?
41Conclusions
- CKD patients have a high burden of symptoms
throughout their illness (not just at the EOL) - Pain in CKD is common, often severe and poorly
managed - Effective pain and symptom management is an
integral component of quality CKD patient care - For management of pain to be effective,
psychosocial factors will need to be addressed
along with the pain - Must optimise BOTH pharmacological and non
pharmacological interventions for effective pain
management
42Conclusions
- Multi professional nephrology teams must focus on
pain and symptom management (clinical and
research) - - training and education
- - culture change
- - dedicated resources
- Management (especially drug use and advance
planning) can be challenging - Flexibility and collaboration are key to
providing good quality care
43Acknowledgements
- The patients for symptom data
- Fliss Murtagh
- Irene Carey Neil Sheerin
- Sarah Watson Kate Shepherd
- Lizzy Bovill
- Renal palliative nurse forum 6/12
- emma.murphy_at_gstt.nhs.uk