Representing the European electricity industry at expert, strategic and policymaking levels' - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Representing the European electricity industry at expert, strategic and policymaking levels'

Description:

If US enacted McCain-Liebermann, it would increase world system compliance costs ... McCain- Lieberman. Click to edit Master text styles. Second level. Third ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: ecEu4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Representing the European electricity industry at expert, strategic and policymaking levels'


1
Representing the European electricity industry at
expert, strategic and policymaking levels.
2
General Principles Governing a post-2012 Climate
Policy Participation - based on the GETS4
analysis
Stakeholder Conference Post-2012 Climate Policy
for the EU
Brussels, 22 November 2004
Dr Bill KYTE, OBE
Chairman
Environment and
Sustainable Development
3
Principles for a Future post-2012 Regime
  • A genuine global approach
  • Longer timelines
  • Emissions reduction goals
  • Market-oriented policies
  • Participation of all sectors
  • Increased RD and technology transfer
    dissemination
  • Encourage changes in consumer behaviour

3/15
4
GETS4 Aims
To assess the impacts of future world GHG
emissions reduction schemes to 2012 and beyond -
In a quantitative manner ( and tCO2eq) - To
2022 gt Kyoto Commitment Period 1 10
years - Using a wide range of scenarios
sensitivities - Within a single analytical
framework gt results from all scenarios
sensitivities directly comparable
4/15
5
Principles for a Future post-2012 Regime
  • A Genuine Global Approach the key issue!
  • EU emits only 14 of global emissions
  • Common objectives for the environment, but also
    for competitive reasons
  • Developing countries need to play an increasing
    role

5/15
6
  • GETS4 conclusions
  • Impacts are dominated by the positions of Russia
    and US
  • If Russia does not participate, compliance costs
    and market traded prices would double
  • If US enacted McCain-Liebermann, it would
    increase world system compliance costs by 3-6
    times

6/15
7
Principles for a Future post-2012 Regime
  • 2. Longer Timelines
  • Absence of certainty creates excessive commercial
    risk
  • Clarity is needed on long-term aim (2050) and on
    goals and instruments over a long-period of time
  • 3. Emissions Reduction Goals
  • Reduction goals must be based on sound scientific
    and

economic analyses
7/15
8
  • GETS4 conclusions
  • Compliance costs increase exponentially with
    severity of targets

- Increasing all targets in all schemes by 50
leads to system compliance costs 3-5 times higher
8/15
9
  • GETS4 conclusions
  • A 2ºC target has a dramatic effect
  • GETS4 has simulated targets based on
  • - Stabilising atmospheric GHG concentration
  • - Equal world per capita emissions
    (contraction convergence)
  • If the EU-25 alone transfers to its share of a
    550 ppm CO2eq target in the period 2013-22,
    EU-25 compliance costs treble
  • - Leading to a doubling of world compliance
    costs
  • - The potential costs of going it alone are
    very high

9/15
10
Principles for a Future post-2012 Regime
4. Market-Oriented Policies
  • Market-based instruments ensure compliance at the
    lowest cost. They should be the preferred tool to
    achieve emissions reductions worldwide.
  • Kyotos flexible mechanisms must be available
    under simplified procedures
  • - Global emissions trading will be an important
    policy instrument to achieve emissions
    reductions.

10/15
11
  • GETS4 conclusions
  • Linking significantly reduces costs for
    participants
  • Highest benefits accrue when linked schemes all
    have significant targets
  • 6-17 reductions in system compliance costs are
    projected from linking the Kyoto scheme to the
    relatively minor Other schemes modelled

11/15
12
Principles for a Future post-2012 Regime
5. Participation of all sectors - Specific
sectors should not be exempted from
contributing to emissions reduction goals
  • GETS4 conclusions
  • - A number of factors greatly alter costs of
    meeting a given set of absolute commitments
  • Supplementarity (minimum domestic action) is a
    costly constraint as it restrains trading
  • High GDP projection increases system compliance
    costs 2-4 times

12/15
13
Principles for a Future post-2012 Regime
6. Increased RD and technology transfer
dissemination
  • - Accelerated and increased funding, and
    international coordination are needed
  • Increase the use of energy end-use efficient
    technologies and non- or low-emitting generation
    technologies, such as
  • - Renewables
  • - Nuclear power
  • - Combined heat and power (CHP)
  • - High-efficiency natural gas
  • - Advanced clean coal (including CO2 capture and
    storage).

13/15
14
Principles for a Future post-2012 Regime
7. Encourage changes in consumer behaviour
- Consumers and their choices make markets -
Policies and measures should be designed to
influence consumers to adopt a more
climate-friendly behaviour - Promotion of
education and training on more efficient use of
resources and environmental awareness
14/15
15
At the forefront of the electricity industry.
www.eurelectric.org

32 2 515 10 00

eurelectric_at_eurelectric.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com