Invention Disclosure Analysis Triage

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Invention Disclosure Analysis Triage

Description:

Estimated time and money expended? ... Interest in the market space. Politics. Assessment tools. Tech assess. Case summary template ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: Gano
Learn more at: https://www.cu.edu

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Invention Disclosure Analysis Triage


1
Invention Disclosure Analysis / Triage
2
Overview
  • Decision making
  • Components of an invention disclosure
  • Review process
  • Qualitative factors art vs. science
  • Tools / frameworks

3
Decisions, decisions
  • The simplified process
  • Patent vs. punt
  • A more mature tech transfer process involves
    technology development
  • Address key questions investigators need to
    answer before we can patent and/or license
  • Identify key projects that will create value
    inflection points for promising technologies
  • Locate financing / management to further develop
    technology

4
Components of a new disclosure
  • Named inventors
  • Invention title
  • Description
  • Patentability bars
  • Disclosure
  • Offer for sale
  • Funding

5
Review process
  • Review process
  • Ownership / rights assessment Do we own it?
  • Commercial feasibility Will people buy it?
  • Patentability Can we protect it?
  • Technical feasibility Does it work?
  • Legal constraints

6
Ownership / rights assessment
  • Factors driving ownership
  • People - Who did the work?
  • Financing Who paid for the development of the
    technology?
  • Location - Where was the work done?
  • Were proprietary tools used?
  • Biomaterials (MTAs)
  • Code

7
Patentability
  • Will inventors own disclosure, sale or use bar
    patentability?
  • To what extent has the invention already been
    described? (i.e. is it novel)
  • Patents
  • Literature
  • Obviousness - TSM test, an invention is obvious
    (and therefore unpatentable) only if there is a
    teaching, suggestion or motivation to combine
    prior art references. 
  • Incremental improvement vs. disruptive
    technology?
  • Anticipated scope of claims
  • Blocking patent vs. an asset to induce investment

8
Commercial feasibility
  • Opportunity or need
  • Market potential
  • Growing vs. declining markets
  • Market structure
  • What is the problem being solved?
  • What is the product and what the applications?
  • Target market
  • Unique benefits / value proposition
  • Competitive analysis
  • Risks
  • Does the added value exceed the cost of
    development?
  • Who are the target licensing partners? How many
    degrees of freedom are there?

9
Technical Feasibility
  • Stage of development
  • Conception
  • Reduction to practice
  • What data exists that demonstrates it works?
  • Estimated time and money expended?
  • Expertise, resources (funds) available for
    further development?

10
Other Legal Constraints
  • Regulatory path
  • Policy
  • Reimbursement

11
Art vs. Science qualitative drivers
  • Inventor motivation
  • Commitment to technology (focus)
  • Inventor reputability
  • Interest in the market space
  • Politics

12
Assessment tools
  • Tech assess
  • Case summary template

13
Resources
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)