Evaluating Web Sites - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluating Web Sites

Description:

Search Engine Database. Search engines. Free. No review of content anyone can publish ... a percent sign ( % ), or or the words 'users,' 'members,' or 'people. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:291
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: bpsu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluating Web Sites


1
Evaluating Web Sites
  • Or
  • Is this a good place to find information?
  • Joyce Laszczak Roberta Sibley

2
Developing essential information literacy skills
  • What am I looking for? Find it.
  • Is this good information? Evaluate it.
  • Analyze and extract relevant information
    summarize take notes.
  • Synthesize put it all together.
  • Use information ethically dont plagiarize.

3
Criteria for Evaluation
  • Authority
  • Accuracy
  • Objectivity
  • Currency
  • Coverage
  • Who
  • What
  • Why
  • When
  • Where

4
Search Engine Database
  • Online or subscription databases
  • Search engines
  • Cost to subscribe not free
  • Contains articles, books and other content that
    is reviewed before publishing
  • Information is categorized and organized
  • Information is stable does not disappear
  • Free
  • No review of content anyone can publish
  • Information is not organized
  • Information is not stable content disappears
  • Searches websites

5
Directoriesthe web organized by topic into
categories
  • MeL, About.com, Librarians Index to the
    Internet, Infomine are examples of directories
  • Organized by category or subject
  • Categorized by people, not machines
  • A directory of websites

6
Authority
  • Is the author identified?
  • Are the authors qualifications given, or an
    email/ postal address?
  • Is the organizations purpose stated, and is a
    contact address given?

7
Authority - What does the domain name suggest?
  • Company - .com
  • Organization - .org
  • Government - .gov
  • US higher education - .edu
  • Network - .net
  • Military - .mil
  • K-12 school

8
Who put up the website?
  • About us," "Philosophy," "Background," "Biography
  • Who links to the page
  • Google the author to find out more
  • Look for a personal name (e.g., jbarker or
    barker) following a tilde ( ), a percent sign (
    ), or or the words "users," "members," or
    "people."

9
Who put up the website?
  • Why was the page put on the web? Inform, sell,
    entice, give facts, give data, explain, persuade,
    share, disclose?
  • Might it be ironic? Satire or parody? Think about
    the "tone" of the page.
  • Humorous? Parody? Exaggerated? Overblown
    arguments?
  • Arguing a viewpoint with examples that suggest
    that what is argued is ultimately not possible.
  • from UC Berkeley Library Finding information
    on the Internet

10
Who put up the website?
  • It is easy to be fooled, and this can make you
    look foolish in turn. Is this as credible and
    useful as the resources (books, journal articles,
    etc.) available in print or online through the
    library? Are you being completely fair? Too
    harsh? Totally objective? Requiring the same
    degree of "proof" you would from a print
    publication?
  • Is the site good for some things and not for
    others?
  • Are your hopes biasing your interpretation?
  • from UC Berkeley Library Finding information on
    the Internet

11
Accuracy
  • Grammatical spelling or typing errors?
  • Sources listed?
  • Charts and graphs clearly labeled?
  • Does material present information that confirms
    or contradicts facts from other sources?

12
Talini
13
(No Transcript)
14
Bias
  • tendency to support or oppose a particular person
    or thing in an unfair way by allowing personal
    opinions to influence your judgment
  • The government has accused the media of bias.
  • There has always been a slight bias in favor of
    employing arts graduates in the company.
  • Reporters must be impartial and not show
    political bias.

15
Objectivity
  • Purpose clearly stated?
  • Is there a particular bias in viewpoint?
  • Does the author distinguish fact from opinion?
  • If there is advertising, is it clearly
    differentiated from informational content?

16
Currency
  • When was it written?
  • Last updated?
  • If material is presented in charts and graphs, is
    it clearly stated when the data were gathered?

17
Coverage
  • Does the page seem to be completed?
  • Is there depth-of-content?
  • Are there links from the site supportive of the
    content?

18
Grammar of the Internet
from November Learning www..november
learnining.com
19
Who links to the site?
20
Do I trust Wikipedia?
21
Web Evaluation
  • United States Environmental Assessment Center-
    DHMO
  • All About Explorers
  • WTO or
  • WTO ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com