CPMR Fellows Conference January 19 20, 2005 Project Management Research: Lessons Learned Life Cycle - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

CPMR Fellows Conference January 19 20, 2005 Project Management Research: Lessons Learned Life Cycle

Description:

Challenges: Student Academic Schedules Don't Always Mesh Well with Experiment Schedules. ... Photos: NASA. Assessments of Student Learning. 10 Qualitative ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: hinn
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CPMR Fellows Conference January 19 20, 2005 Project Management Research: Lessons Learned Life Cycle


1
CPMR Fellows ConferenceJanuary 19 20,
2005Project Management Research Lessons
Learned Life Cycle Processes and Aerospace
Workforce Development
Dr. Noel W. Hinners Senior Research
Associate Laboratory for Atmospheric Space
Physics University of Colorado-Boulder noelhinners
_at_msn.com
2
Task 1 Lessons Learned Research
  • Analyze Several Projects to Assess
  • Gaps in capturing LL in the project LL life-cycle
    as projects progress through a continuum of
    conception/advanced study, mission and systems
    definition (FA), preliminary design (FB), design
    build (FC), integration, test and launch
    operations (FD), operations (FE) and close-out.
  • Adequacy of funding for implementing LL processes
  • Adequacy of project motivation
  • Presence of Impediments
  • Prepare for More Thorough F2 Assessment
  • Conduct the Analyses on Specific Demonstration
    Projects
  • A Student Flight Experiment
  • Two Small Explorer Projects at LASP
  • An Industry/JPL Project

3
Student Dust Counter
Credit Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics
Laboratory/ Southwest Research Institute
4
Student Dust Counter(SDC)
  • An Education Public Outreach (EPO) for the New
    Horizons Mission to Pluto Kuiper Belt
  • Principal Investigator Dr. Alan Stern, SWRI
  • Applied Physics Laboratory Managing Mission
  • Prof. Mihaly Horanyi, CU, SDC PI
  • Proposed by SWRI and LASP to NASA as an
    Educational Opportunity for Students Initiated
    in 2002
  • First-time Measurement of Interplanetary Dust at
    These Distances
  • The Experience Counts

A Real Flight Experiment Going to Pluto and Beyond
5
SDC Lessons Learned Goals
  • Evaluate Student Performance
  • Determine Improvements
  • Evaluate Contribution to Student Education and to
    LASP/NASA
  • Develop Recommendations for Future Student Flight
    Experiments

6
SDC Implementation
  • Team Selected Competitively
  • 12 to 15 Aerospace, Mechanical, Electrical,
    Physics, Humanities Students on the Team
  • A Mix of Undergrads, Graduate Students
  • LASP Professionals to Mentor, Advise
  • A Student Project Manager Appointed
  • Extremely Capable with Work History
  • 20 Hours/Week in Academic Year, 40 in Summer
  • Must Meet Real Flight Mission Requirements
  • Design, Build, Integrate, Test and Operate to
    Succeed
  • Meet all Schedule, Budget and Performance Reqs

7
SDC Team
Student-Designed Logo
The Experiment
http//lasp.colorado.edu/sdc/
8
Preliminary SDC Lessons Learned
  • Challenges
  • Student Academic Schedules Dont Always Mesh Well
    with Experiment Schedules. e.g., Exam Time. Must
    Factor in at Project Initiation
  • Budget Was Underscoped
  • Heritage Did Not Pan Out as Planned
  • First Student Project Manager Did Not Work Out
  • Replacement and Increased LASP Staff Attention
    Reestablished Team Spirit
  • Consider Not Having Student PM
  • Professional Staff Availability Initially Not
    Sufficient
  • Must Have Some Dedicated Staff Time

Student Flight Experiments Require Significant
Professional Staff Could Not Be Done with One
or Two Department Faculty
9
Preliminary SDC Lessons Learned
  • SDC Was First NH Experiment Delivered to APL
    (Source of Student Pride)
  • Students Performed with Professionalism
  • Presented in NASA Reviews
  • One Reviewer re Software Best Review Ive Seen
  • The Learning Experience Unmatched as a Career
    Enhancement
  • A Level and Variety of Experience New Hires in
    Government Industry Do Not Have and Often Do
    Not Get
  • Five Students Hired by LASP Working on NASA
    Projects
  • Student PMs Now Working in Industry

Unanimous Staff Student View Do It Again! Need
to Demonstrate Value to NASA
10
SORCE AIM
  • NASA Small Explorer Missions
  • LASP Managed under NASA Goddard SMEX Management
  • SORCE (Solar Radiation and Climate Experiment) in
    Flight Operations since Jan. 03
  • AIM (Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere) is Under
    Development CDR Held in December, 04

SORCE
11
Odyssey
  • Selected in December as a LL Replacement for MRO
  • A Highly Successful Mars Orbit Mission
  • No Formal New Lessons Learned Process Took Place
  • Odyssey Benefited from the Mars Surveyor Lessons
    Learned Activity
  • Numerous Reviews Instituted
  • Institution of Rigorous Fault Tree Approach
    Pre-flight Now Being Used on MRO
  • Contractor Project Wanted to Conduct a Thorough
    LL
  • No Funding Available from Project or Contractor
  • Odyssey Staff at Contractor Reassigned After
    Launch
  • Contractor S/C Manager Now Director of Mars
    Program
  • LL by Assimilation

12
Lessons Learned ProcessConsolidated Preliminary
Results - 1
  • Several Additional Key Interviews and Refinements
    Scheduled for Late January/Early February
  • Political Issues Must Be Resolved with Govt,
    Industry and Academia
  • Some Reluctance to Openly Share Certain LL
    (Competitive Issues)
  • Is an Anonymous System, a lá FAA Pilot Error
    Reporting a Partial Solution?
  • A Clear Desire Exists to Conduct Systematic LL
  • Useful Commentary Repeatedly Obtained
  • Using Critical Milestones as Checkpoints for
    Systematic LL Can Obviate Memory Loss
  • RFAs, Comments During Critical Reviews Are an
    Untapped Source of LL
  • Story Telling Viewed as a Most Effective
    Mechanism
  • LL Information Systems are Cumbersome and of
    Little Practical Use

13
Lessons Learned ProcessConsolidated Preliminary
Results - 2
  • Funding is a Significant Impediment Projects Do
    Not Budget for LL Activity
  • Competitive Posture Institutional
    Responsibility Undefined Requirement
  • Augment Project Staff with a Responsible LL Lead
  • Quality Assurance
  • Mission Success
  • Central Engineering
  • LL Seen as Only a Partial Part of Attaining
    Mission Success
  • Training of New Hires, Recent Grads Is
    Inadequate Across the Aerospace Profession.
  • How You Do Business
  • Hands-On Experience

14
Task 2 Workforce Development
Photos Courtesy NASA And DoD
15
Senior Projects in Aerospace Engineering Sciences
at University of Colorado
  • A Capstone Experience for All Seniors in AES
  • Conceive, Design, Build, Integrate, Test and
    Operate a Project That Builds on Courses
  • Form Project Teams Elect PM, Appoint CFO and
    Safety Engineer
  • 2004 2005
  • Eight Teams of 10 Students Each
  • Project Advisory Board of Faculty Staff

16
The CPMR Opportunity
  • AES Faculty Recognized Need for Injecting Project
    Management Fundamentals into SP
  • Conduct a Research Activity to
  • Instill Fundamentals of PM into Student Teams
    Through a Series of PM Tutorials
  • Use NASA Lessons Learned to Bring Tutorials Alive
  • Evaluate Effectiveness and Relevance of Tutorials
  • Evaluate Incorporation of PM Techniques in
    Project Performance
  • Track Long-term Career Progression to Assess
    Impact of Hands-on Experience and PM Learning

17
AES Senior Projects Fundamentals of Project
Management
18
Example Lessons Learned in Student Tutorials
Make Them Relevant
Verification Failure
Budget, PM, Test
Shoddy Work
Model PM
QA Breakdown
Verification Process Failure
Budget, PM
Safety
Cost Overrun
Ethics
Ken Cedeno/Bloomberg News
Photos NASA
19
Assessments of Student Learning
  • 10 Qualitative Survey Questions
  • Strongly Somewhat
    Neutral Somewhat
    Strongly
  • Disagree Disagree
    Agree
    Agree
  • 5 Survey Response Questions
  • Survey Rank of Tutorials 1 Most Valuable, 8
    Least
  • Examine PDR and CDR Reports for Evidence of PM
  • Interview Student Project Managers
  • Interview Project Advisory Board

20
Student Tutorial Ranking (Examples)
21
Student Response to Questions (Examples)
22
Preliminary Conclusions
  • Many of the Students are Learning and Using PM
    Techniques
  • Students Vary Greatly in Desire to Learn PM
    Techniques
  • Senior Project Variation in Scope and Complexity
    Influences Use of PM Techniques

University Senior Capstone Projects Provide an
Excellent Opportunity to Educate Engineers in PM
Value and Techniques
23
Recommendations for Future
  • Incorporate Lessons Learned from Past Student
    Projects to Bring More Reality to SP, e.g.,
  • Oversubscription of Machine Shop
  • Personality Issues
  • Focus Some Mentoring on PMs and Teams
  • Class-room Environment Not Conducive to Dialog
  • PMs Have the Greater Need to Learn (Incentive?)
  • Incorporate PM Goals in Syllabus and Make Part of
    Grade
  • Students Respond to What Gets Graded
  • Present Overview and Goals of Project Management
    to PAB at Beginning of Semester
  • Will Improve Ability to Aid Student Teams
  • Many Simply Do Not Have Time to Attend PM
    Lectures
  • Find a Way to Continue in Second Semester

24
Preliminary General Conclusions F 1 Program
Management Research
  • University Hands-On Flight Projects Provide
    Powerful Training Grounds for the Future
    Aerospace WorkforceThe Importance of this Must
    Be Communicated to Government
  • University Capstone Senior Projects Provide a
    Productive Opportunity to Instill Project
    Management Fundamentals into the Future Workforce
  • University NASA Flight Projects Need to be More
    Carefully Integrated, at an Appropiate Level,
    into the NASA Management System
  • NASA Needs to Better Define, Promulgate, Track
    and Use its Lessons Learned Process It Should
    Examine How Better to Cooperatively Involve
    Industry and Academia without Fear of Penalty
    vis-Ă -vis Competition. It Should Get 7120.5C
    Finished.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com