Title: I' David Held: Globalization Schools of Thought
1I. David Held Globalization Schools of
Thought II. Major Areas of Debate
2- Discussion
- Globalization Debate first paragraph, page 2
- Hyperglobalizers, Skeptics, and
Transformationalists which author best
represents which school of thought?
3Hyperglobalizers Whats the basic thrust of this
perspective on globalization? Is it tied to any
particular political position about globalization?
4- The Hyperglobalization School of Thought
- Globalization as primarily economic in
naturebut with broad effects in other areas - Global competition is a central reality for all
players - New rules of the gameprotectionism, labor
rigidities, traditional social welfare programs
seen as outdated and counter-productive
5- The Hyperglobalization School of Thought
- The demise of the nation stateor at least its
weakening - New actors transnational corporations, industry
organizations, empowered individuals, etc. - An unleashed capitalism transforming the world
- Globalization as reducing global inequality
6The Hyperglobalization School of
Thought Different normative or evaluative
positions exist How would a neoliberal vs. a
Marxist hyperglobalizer differ?
7Skeptics Whats the basic thrust of this
perspective on globalization? Is it tied to any
particular political position about globalization?
8- The Skeptical School of Thought
- Internationalization rather than globalization
- Governments remain central and basically in
control - The distinctiveness of the current era is
disputed - Globalization as tending to reinforce
inequalities - Tendency toward fragmentation into
civilizational or other blocs
9- The Skeptical School of Thought
- Globalization a convenient rationale for
implementing unpopular policies - Fundamentalism and aggressive nationalism likely
to challenge the hyperglobalizer utopia - Limits of interdependence
10The Skeptical School of Thought Different
normative or evaluative positions exist How
might these positions differ?
11Transformationalists Whats the basic thrust of
this perspective on globalization? Is it tied to
any particular political position about
globalization?
How does Barber exemplify this school of thought?
12- The Transformationalist School of Thought
- Contemporary globalization is unprecedented
- Operates at many levels and in all domains
- Globalizations future trajectory remains
uncertain - Many new actors at all levels
- New non-territorial forms of economic and
political organization
13- The Transformationalist School of Thought
- The future of globalization will depend on many
processes, including what forms of global
governance emerge - Alternative globalization projects
14The Transformalist School of Thought Different
normative or evaluative positions exist How
might these positions differ?
Useful review table on p. 10
15Frank Lechner Globalization Debates 1) Is
globalization a process or a project? 2) Is
globalization really something new under the
sun? 3) Is globalization good or bad?
Examine Globalization 101 reading
16Frank Lechner Globalization Debates 4)
Explaining globalization hard or soft
factors? 5) Globalizations political effect
demise or revival of nation-state? 6) Does
globalization produce cultural sameness
(homogenization) or difference? Other questions
we should be asking?