Political Science 2O06 Political Theory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Political Science 2O06 Political Theory

Description:

'What should be the relation between political power and economic success? ... What should be the relationship between economic wealth and political power? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:565
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: josepha1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Political Science 2O06 Political Theory


1
Political Science 2O06Political Theory
Lecture One Introduction to Political Theory
2
What is Political Theory?
  • As we know, political science is the study of
    governments, public policies and political
    processes, systems, and political behaviour. 
  • There are several different approaches to the
    study of politics.
  • We might divide the study of political science
    into two camps.
  • On the one hand we have the descriptive approach
    to political science. This facet of political
    science focuses on observing actual behaviour of
    political agents (state, politicians, etc.) and
    making empirical observations about them.
  • Political theory takes the prescriptive approach,
    and focuses on making normative statements about
    the political world.

3
The study of political theory could be boiled
down to two questions.
  • Who gets what? and Says who? Jonathan Wolff

4
Not quite. However.
  • it is a useful starting point.
  • Political theory focuses on several normative
    questions in politics How should it be?.
  • Political theory deals with the fundamental
    questions, or first-order questions about the
    state, government, politics, liberty, justice,
    property, rights, and law.

5
Some major questions
  • Should we have a state?
  • What justifies the state?
  • What is political power?
  • What is the best way to make new laws?
  • Who or what has the right to exercise this
    political power?
  • How much power should the state exert over
    me?
  • Why should the state have authority over me,
    or the lives of those close to me?
  • Should I be able to do whatever I want? Should
    others have the same the right as I do?
  • These are some of the Says who? questions.

6
More major questions
  • On what basis should people possess property?
  • What rights and liberties should individuals
    enjoy?
  • Is there any good reason why some people should
    have more property than others?
  • What should be the relation between political
    power and economic success?
  • Should there be any connection between the two
    at all?
  • How much liberty should I have?
  • How much liberty should my neighbour have?
  • How should these rights be given to me? As an
    individual, or as a member or group?
  • Who or what should guarantee my rights?
  • What principles should be used to judge when
    rights conflict?
  • These are some of the Who gets what?
    questions.

7
These are some of the major questions that
political theorists (or political philosophers)
have struggled with for thousands of years.
They are serious questions and must be taken
seriously if we as individuals or as a society
want to seriously answer the question What is
to be done? One thing we have to deal with when
studying the history of political theory is that
these philosophers have answered these questions
in very different ways.
8
The study of political theory
  • The study of politics goes back to the time of
    ancient Greece to both Plato and Aristotle.
  • They had begun with the question What is the
    best regime?
  • We can study political theory in two different
    ways.
  • One way is to look real-world issues and examine
    and debate normative issues surrounding them (ex
    when is it right to go to war?)
  • Another way is to act as a historian of
    political ideas and examine what past theorists
    have dealt with these issues.
  • The latter approach will be used in this course.

9
Goals of this course
  • You will become acquainted with theories of the
    some the most important philosophers to have ever
    lived. You will be able to distinguish a Platonic
    argument from, say, a Lockean one.
  • This will help you become familiarized and
    acquainted various elements within political
    theory as presented by the philosophers in this
    course.
  • In this course you will grapple with these
    critical issues presented by these thinkers. You
    will quickly find that they do not agree with
    each other on much. Often you will find a
    philosopher arguing directly against another
    philosopher (ex. Rousseau against Hobbes and
    Locke).
  • You will learn how to critically and carefully
    read. These are not easy texts to understand, and
    their meaning can easily be lost.
  • You will also learn how to critically examine
    and assess the works of these theorists, over and
    above the ability to summarize and explicate
    these arguments.

10
About this course
  • This is an introductory course in political
    theory. It is not meant to be an exhaustive study
    of the history of political thought. It is only
    meant to give you a sample of what political
    theory is like.
  • It is a selective course. We simply do not have
    the time to study everyone who wrote something
    significant about politics.
  • It is selective in two ways. First, it is
    selective in who we study. A lot of very
    important thinkers are not studied in this
    course.
  • Secondly, it is selective in what we read. Often
    a theorist has several key works that are worth
    studying (ex Plato. I could easily have you read
    The Laws, Gorgias, and the Phaedo in addition to
    what I assigned).
  • It is often a challenge for a lecturer to decide
    which thinker and which text to include or not
    a lot of exclusions have to be made.
  • Ultimately these courses are personal or
    subjective ones. (Which work does the lecturer
    think is important?)
  • What you do get here are the bare essentials or
    absolute classics of this course.

11
People worth mentioning
12
More worth mentioning
13
Germans worth mentioning
14
Themes worth mentioning
  • You will notice that there are no women in the
    course.
  • Feminist political theory is a relatively new
    phenomenon in political theory. Most of the major
    contributors are still alive (Carole Pateman,
    Catherine McKinnon, Anne Phillips).
  • The first major contribution to political theory
    made a by a woman was by Mary Wollstonecraft (A
    Vindication of the Rights of Man and A
    Vindication of the Rights of Woman).
  • Another major female political theorist was
    Hannah Arendt.
  • Other male political theorists have called
    attention to feminist issues (J. S. Mills The
    Subjection of Women).

15
More themes worth mentioning
  • You will also notice that we only cover Western
    thinkers.
  • Usually Eastern political theorists (much like
    feminist theorists) are usually studied in their
    own courses.
  • However, it is important to recognize that
    without medieval Muslim scholars (such as
    Averroes and Avercinna), political theory could
    not have evolved.
  • Muslim scholars rediscovered Aristotle and
    reintroduced his work to the Western world.
  • Averroes had a profound impact on medieval
    political philosophy, most notably on the work of
    St. Thomas Aquinas.

16
A quick summary
  • So far we have looked at what political theory
    is about.
  • We have looked at some of the normative
    questions that political theorists have dealt
    with in the past, and continue to deal with
    today.
  • We talked about how we study political theory.
  • We talked about some of the skills that you
    should be develop when this course is finished.
  • We also had a look at some of the major
    political thinkers that will not be covered in
    this course.

17
So what will we do in this course?
18
Who we will read in this course
19
Themes studied in this course
  • Justification of the State
  • The State of Nature
  • Who Should Rule?
  • The Place and the Nature of Liberty
  • The Distribution of Property
  • The Individual and Justice

20
Justification of the State
  • The purpose of political theory is not to
    answer what kind of state there should be, but
    rather whether there should be states at all
    Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia.
  • As stated earlier, this question was one of the
    first question asked by political philosophers
    (Platos Republic and Aristotles Politics).
  • What is the best kind of state that can allow
    for its citizens to live justly?
  • What kind of normative principles should the
    state embody?
  • What should the ideal arrangement of the state
    be?
  • What actions should the state do to render
    itself legitimate to its citizens?
  • What principles should the state embody for its
    citizens? (utility? Justice? Etc.)
  • What makes people want to live under the state
    than live without it?

21
The State of Nature
  • The state of nature is the state of existence
    human beings live in without the state.
  • This has been interpreted to mean either one of
    two things.
  • First, the state of nature has been used to
    refer to an actual historical time when human
    beings lived without a state.
  • Second, it has been used as a hypothetical
    situation that imagines how human beings would
    behave if the state were not there.
  • This has been used by political theorists to
    help justify the state.
  • How would people act if the state was not there?
    Would they do bad things?
  • What is the nature of humans? Are their natures
    something set in stone or is it something that
    has evolved over time and can continue to evolve?

22
Who Should Rule?
  • So we have a state. Who should be in control of
    it?
  • To use a more elegant term who or what should
    be sovereign?
  • We have a few options we can have the rule of
    none (anarchy), the rule of one (monarchy), the
    rule of the few (oligarchy), or the rule of many
    (democracy).
  • Believe it or not, you will find people in this
    course who will make the case that ordinary
    people should not have a say in ruling (due to
    their nature).
  • Even if theorists argue that the many should
    rule, they will disagree how they should rule.
  • When should people have a direct say in their
    own rule, and when should they trust
    representatives to rule in their place?
  • What are the duties of citizens in a regime if
    they have a share in ruling?

23
The Place and the Nature of Liberty
  • How and when are individuals free?
  • Does freedom exist when we do not have
    restrictions or barriers to our actions placed in
    our way?
  • Or are we free when we have the capabilities to
    do whatever we want?
  • What guarantees our freedom? What should be the
    tools to protect freedom?
  • Is there are a sphere of non-interference that a
    person enjoys that no one can encroach upon?
  • When is it justified for an individual to
    interfere in the liberty of others?
  • When is it justified for the state to interfere
    in the liberty of others?
  • How do I enjoy my liberty? Do I enjoy it as an
    individual or as a member of society?

24
The Distribution of Property
  • In society, people own property. That is part of
    human nature.
  • Should everyone have the same amount of
    property? Or at the very least, should none be so
    rich that they could buy another?
  • Everyone having the same amount of property is
    highly unlikely. So how much inequality is
    acceptable between individuals?
  • What should be the relationship between economic
    wealth and political power?
  • Put another way should only the rich or
    well-off be able to rule?
  • And how do we come to own property? Why should
    you believe me when I say that this laptop is
    mine?
  • What are legitimate ways to acquire property?
  • Do people have the right to acquire whatever
    they want? Are there things that they can and
    cannot own?

25
The Individual and Justice
  • How are we to enjoy or social and political
    rights? How do are we to respected in society?
  • What should take priority the individual or
    society?
  • Should our identifications to various groups
    (ethnicity, religion, etc.) have any bearing in
    the political sphere? Should we be accorded
    special rights because of our belonging to these
    groups?
  • If we have group rights, how are they to mesh
    with individual rights? What do we do when they
    conflict?
  • What role should justice play in politics?
  • What is the relationship between the justice on
    the individual level and justice at the
    collective level?
  • What is the form that justice takes, if it is
    agreed that justice should play a role in
    politics?
  • Can a system of rights and a set of political
    institutions be derived from principles of
    justice?

26
How to do well in this course
  • Attend every lecture.
  • Read everything that is assigned to you at
    least once. Your ability to read and understand
    these texts is critical to your success in this
    course. Ideally you should read everything twice.
  • When you get your essay questions, it is
    imperative that you answer the question that you
    choose to answer. Dont answer the question you
    want to answer.
  • Structure your essays properly.
  • The essays should be considered dry runs for the
    exams. The nature of the questions for both the
    essays and exam will be very much the same. The
    only difference is the time in which to do them.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com