Title: Political Science 2O06 Political Theory
1Political Science 2O06Political Theory
Lecture One Introduction to Political Theory
2What is Political Theory?
- As we know, political science is the study of
governments, public policies and political
processes, systems, and political behaviour. - There are several different approaches to the
study of politics. - We might divide the study of political science
into two camps. - On the one hand we have the descriptive approach
to political science. This facet of political
science focuses on observing actual behaviour of
political agents (state, politicians, etc.) and
making empirical observations about them. - Political theory takes the prescriptive approach,
and focuses on making normative statements about
the political world.
3The study of political theory could be boiled
down to two questions.
- Who gets what? and Says who? Jonathan Wolff
4Not quite. However.
- it is a useful starting point.
- Political theory focuses on several normative
questions in politics How should it be?. - Political theory deals with the fundamental
questions, or first-order questions about the
state, government, politics, liberty, justice,
property, rights, and law.
5Some major questions
- Should we have a state?
- What justifies the state?
- What is political power?
- What is the best way to make new laws?
- Who or what has the right to exercise this
political power? - How much power should the state exert over
me? - Why should the state have authority over me,
or the lives of those close to me? - Should I be able to do whatever I want? Should
others have the same the right as I do? - These are some of the Says who? questions.
6More major questions
- On what basis should people possess property?
- What rights and liberties should individuals
enjoy? - Is there any good reason why some people should
have more property than others? - What should be the relation between political
power and economic success? - Should there be any connection between the two
at all? - How much liberty should I have?
- How much liberty should my neighbour have?
- How should these rights be given to me? As an
individual, or as a member or group? - Who or what should guarantee my rights?
- What principles should be used to judge when
rights conflict? - These are some of the Who gets what?
questions.
7These are some of the major questions that
political theorists (or political philosophers)
have struggled with for thousands of years.
They are serious questions and must be taken
seriously if we as individuals or as a society
want to seriously answer the question What is
to be done? One thing we have to deal with when
studying the history of political theory is that
these philosophers have answered these questions
in very different ways.
8The study of political theory
- The study of politics goes back to the time of
ancient Greece to both Plato and Aristotle. - They had begun with the question What is the
best regime? - We can study political theory in two different
ways. - One way is to look real-world issues and examine
and debate normative issues surrounding them (ex
when is it right to go to war?) - Another way is to act as a historian of
political ideas and examine what past theorists
have dealt with these issues. - The latter approach will be used in this course.
9Goals of this course
- You will become acquainted with theories of the
some the most important philosophers to have ever
lived. You will be able to distinguish a Platonic
argument from, say, a Lockean one. - This will help you become familiarized and
acquainted various elements within political
theory as presented by the philosophers in this
course. - In this course you will grapple with these
critical issues presented by these thinkers. You
will quickly find that they do not agree with
each other on much. Often you will find a
philosopher arguing directly against another
philosopher (ex. Rousseau against Hobbes and
Locke). - You will learn how to critically and carefully
read. These are not easy texts to understand, and
their meaning can easily be lost. - You will also learn how to critically examine
and assess the works of these theorists, over and
above the ability to summarize and explicate
these arguments.
10About this course
- This is an introductory course in political
theory. It is not meant to be an exhaustive study
of the history of political thought. It is only
meant to give you a sample of what political
theory is like. - It is a selective course. We simply do not have
the time to study everyone who wrote something
significant about politics. - It is selective in two ways. First, it is
selective in who we study. A lot of very
important thinkers are not studied in this
course. - Secondly, it is selective in what we read. Often
a theorist has several key works that are worth
studying (ex Plato. I could easily have you read
The Laws, Gorgias, and the Phaedo in addition to
what I assigned). - It is often a challenge for a lecturer to decide
which thinker and which text to include or not
a lot of exclusions have to be made. - Ultimately these courses are personal or
subjective ones. (Which work does the lecturer
think is important?) - What you do get here are the bare essentials or
absolute classics of this course.
11People worth mentioning
12More worth mentioning
13Germans worth mentioning
14Themes worth mentioning
- You will notice that there are no women in the
course. - Feminist political theory is a relatively new
phenomenon in political theory. Most of the major
contributors are still alive (Carole Pateman,
Catherine McKinnon, Anne Phillips). - The first major contribution to political theory
made a by a woman was by Mary Wollstonecraft (A
Vindication of the Rights of Man and A
Vindication of the Rights of Woman). - Another major female political theorist was
Hannah Arendt. - Other male political theorists have called
attention to feminist issues (J. S. Mills The
Subjection of Women).
15More themes worth mentioning
- You will also notice that we only cover Western
thinkers. - Usually Eastern political theorists (much like
feminist theorists) are usually studied in their
own courses. - However, it is important to recognize that
without medieval Muslim scholars (such as
Averroes and Avercinna), political theory could
not have evolved. - Muslim scholars rediscovered Aristotle and
reintroduced his work to the Western world. - Averroes had a profound impact on medieval
political philosophy, most notably on the work of
St. Thomas Aquinas.
16A quick summary
- So far we have looked at what political theory
is about. - We have looked at some of the normative
questions that political theorists have dealt
with in the past, and continue to deal with
today. - We talked about how we study political theory.
- We talked about some of the skills that you
should be develop when this course is finished. - We also had a look at some of the major
political thinkers that will not be covered in
this course.
17So what will we do in this course?
18Who we will read in this course
19Themes studied in this course
- Justification of the State
- The State of Nature
- Who Should Rule?
- The Place and the Nature of Liberty
- The Distribution of Property
- The Individual and Justice
20Justification of the State
- The purpose of political theory is not to
answer what kind of state there should be, but
rather whether there should be states at all
Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia. - As stated earlier, this question was one of the
first question asked by political philosophers
(Platos Republic and Aristotles Politics). - What is the best kind of state that can allow
for its citizens to live justly? - What kind of normative principles should the
state embody? - What should the ideal arrangement of the state
be? - What actions should the state do to render
itself legitimate to its citizens? - What principles should the state embody for its
citizens? (utility? Justice? Etc.) - What makes people want to live under the state
than live without it?
21The State of Nature
- The state of nature is the state of existence
human beings live in without the state. - This has been interpreted to mean either one of
two things. - First, the state of nature has been used to
refer to an actual historical time when human
beings lived without a state. - Second, it has been used as a hypothetical
situation that imagines how human beings would
behave if the state were not there. - This has been used by political theorists to
help justify the state. - How would people act if the state was not there?
Would they do bad things? - What is the nature of humans? Are their natures
something set in stone or is it something that
has evolved over time and can continue to evolve?
22Who Should Rule?
- So we have a state. Who should be in control of
it? - To use a more elegant term who or what should
be sovereign? - We have a few options we can have the rule of
none (anarchy), the rule of one (monarchy), the
rule of the few (oligarchy), or the rule of many
(democracy). - Believe it or not, you will find people in this
course who will make the case that ordinary
people should not have a say in ruling (due to
their nature). - Even if theorists argue that the many should
rule, they will disagree how they should rule. - When should people have a direct say in their
own rule, and when should they trust
representatives to rule in their place? - What are the duties of citizens in a regime if
they have a share in ruling?
23The Place and the Nature of Liberty
- How and when are individuals free?
- Does freedom exist when we do not have
restrictions or barriers to our actions placed in
our way? - Or are we free when we have the capabilities to
do whatever we want? - What guarantees our freedom? What should be the
tools to protect freedom? - Is there are a sphere of non-interference that a
person enjoys that no one can encroach upon? - When is it justified for an individual to
interfere in the liberty of others? - When is it justified for the state to interfere
in the liberty of others? - How do I enjoy my liberty? Do I enjoy it as an
individual or as a member of society?
24The Distribution of Property
- In society, people own property. That is part of
human nature. - Should everyone have the same amount of
property? Or at the very least, should none be so
rich that they could buy another? - Everyone having the same amount of property is
highly unlikely. So how much inequality is
acceptable between individuals? - What should be the relationship between economic
wealth and political power? - Put another way should only the rich or
well-off be able to rule? - And how do we come to own property? Why should
you believe me when I say that this laptop is
mine? - What are legitimate ways to acquire property?
- Do people have the right to acquire whatever
they want? Are there things that they can and
cannot own?
25The Individual and Justice
- How are we to enjoy or social and political
rights? How do are we to respected in society? - What should take priority the individual or
society? - Should our identifications to various groups
(ethnicity, religion, etc.) have any bearing in
the political sphere? Should we be accorded
special rights because of our belonging to these
groups? - If we have group rights, how are they to mesh
with individual rights? What do we do when they
conflict? - What role should justice play in politics?
- What is the relationship between the justice on
the individual level and justice at the
collective level? - What is the form that justice takes, if it is
agreed that justice should play a role in
politics? - Can a system of rights and a set of political
institutions be derived from principles of
justice?
26How to do well in this course
- Attend every lecture.
- Read everything that is assigned to you at
least once. Your ability to read and understand
these texts is critical to your success in this
course. Ideally you should read everything twice. - When you get your essay questions, it is
imperative that you answer the question that you
choose to answer. Dont answer the question you
want to answer. - Structure your essays properly.
- The essays should be considered dry runs for the
exams. The nature of the questions for both the
essays and exam will be very much the same. The
only difference is the time in which to do them.