Results and Discussion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

Results and Discussion

Description:

Results. Effect on productivity indicators ... Results are preliminary. Further controls for experience throughout the surveys needed. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:122
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: mcan2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Results and Discussion


1
Effect of Pay Structure on Interviewer
Productivity Michelle Cantave (REDA
International, Inc JPSM), Frauke Kreuter (JPSM,
University of Maryland), Elham-Eid Alldredge
(REDA International, Inc)
  • Study Background
  • JPSM 2008 Practicum Survey
  • Primary purpose of the study was to see if there
    was an effect of filter question format (grouped
    vs. interleafed) on respondent answers.
  • Additional experiment to test if interviewer pay
    structure had an effect on productivity and the
    quality of the data collected.
  • Telephone survey conducted for the University of
    Maryland, College Park JPSM Practicum class.
  • Data collected by REDA International, Inc. from
    August 2008 to September 2008. Sample released in
    replicates.
  • N 1,745 825 in grouped and 827 in interleafed
    condition. Test for successful randomization on
    frame variables. AAPOR Response Rate (4) 14.
  • Acknowledgements Stanley Presser, Roger
    Tourangeau, Katharine Abraham, Susan McCulloch
  • Experimental Design
  • Questionnaire Format Respondents were randomly
    assigned to a Grouped or Interleafed
    questionnaire format
  • Interviewer pay structure
  • All interviewers were paid by the hour at the
    beginning of the study.
  • At the time of release of the 2nd replicate, a
    random subset of interviewers (n20) were
    switched a paid-by-case payment scheme. Remaining
    interviewers (n16) continued with normal hourly
    payment.
  • Measures Examined
  • Productivity
  • Dialings Per Log-on Hour The number of telephone
    calls the interviewer made on average for every
    hour he or she was logged on. Interviewer is
    considered productive if the rate is high.
  • Completes Per Log-on Hour The average number of
    completes the interviewer get for every hour
    logged on to the system. Interviewer is
    considered productive the higher this rate is.
  • Dialings Per Complete This rate is a measure of
    how good the interviewer is at gaining the
    cooperation of respondents and how difficult the
    respondents are. The lower this rate, the more
    successful the interviewer in gaining
    cooperation.
  • Consequences for Data Quality
  • Interviewers in pay-by-case scheme have an
    incentive to shorten the interview. Thus
    interviews conducted in this payment scheme
    might
  • Take on average less time
  • Show fewer affirmative responses to filter
    questions

Results and Discussion
  • Results
  • Effect on productivity indicators
  • No difference in average number of dialings
    before and after the switch in interviewer pay
    structure.
  • Increase in the average completes per log-on hour
    after the change in interviewer pay structure
    (plt0.05).
  • Decrease in the average dialings per complete
    after the change in interviewer pay structure
    (plt0.05).
  • Data Quality
  • No significant effect on interview length (569
    interviews conducted in pay-by-case payment
    scheme took on average 18 minutes 95 interviews
    conducted in hourly payment condition took on
    average 20 minutes).
  • There was not a significant different in the
    average number of affirmative answers to filter
    questions when comparing individual interviewers
    results before and after the switch in payment,
    nor when comparing two payment conditions for the
    second replicate sample.
  • Summary and Discussion
  • The switch in interviewer pay structure had a
    positive effect on interviewer productivity.
  • Results are preliminary. Further controls for
    experience throughout the surveys needed.
  • It appears that paying interviewers by the
    completed interview, as opposed to by the hour,
    does not reduce the frequency of affirmative
    answers to filter questions.
  • We compared hourly payment to case payment with a
    floor (that is interviewers were told they could
    earn more in the per-case condition but not
    less). The effect on data quality in a pure
    by-the-case comparison scheme might be different.
  • The effect of compensation arrangement for
    decentralized in-person surveys (where monitoring
    is unusual) might differ from that in centralized
    telephone surveys (where monitoring is routine).

REDA International, Inc. Quality
research guiding policy and change Since
1992 www.redainternational.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com