Title: Rapidly Deployable Infrastructures for Communications and Localization in Disaster Management Scenar
1Rapidly Deployable Infrastructures for
Communications and Localization in Disaster
Management Scenarios, Requirements and Concepts
United Nations International Workshop on the Use
of Space Technology for Disaster
Management, Munich, Germany, 18-22 October, 2004
- Michael Angermann (German Aerospace Center)
- Thomas Strang (German Aerospace Center)
- Martin Kähmer (University of Freiburg)
- Michael Kreutzer (University of Freiburg)
2Outline
- Motivation
- Technological Components
- Scenarios
- Earthquake/CSSR (collapsed structure search and
rescue) - Field hospital
- Flooding/evacuation
- Conclusions
- Request for Feedback and Participation
3Motivation I
- Discussions with experienced people of
organizations involved in disaster management and
humanitarian aid (Red Cross, THW, German Armed
Forces, UNHCR,) have given us some insight into
the current status of communications and
information technology, typically in use - Voice radio communication is used for
communicating among on-site personnel - Voice satellite communication is used for
communicating among local and central HQs (fixed
terminals) and sometimes between mobile personnel
(Thuraya, Iridium) - Data satellite communication is only rarely used
(e.g. for uploading pictures for press work).
These data satellite communication links
terminate at local and central HQs and are rarely
or not at all utilized from mobile terminals.
- Note Satellites, typically in use, are
Eutelsat, Intelsat, PanAmSat, Inmarsat, Thuraya,
Iridium
4Motivation II
- Information/Data is relayed by hand/voice from
HQ to mobile personnel. - The potential benefit of more advanced
information sharing is not fully utilized, due
to - Problem 1 Cost of hardware
- Problem 2 Incompatibility among systems
- Problem 3 Lack of a suitable mechanism to
select the information/addressee suiting the
scope of the task at hand - Hence, funds and the efforts of personnel may
result in less aid than possible. - Our previous work in the relevant technical
fields gives us reason to believe that the major
problems can be solved.
5Technological Components
- Existing satellite communication systems
(Inmarsat, Thuraya,) - Satellite navigation systems (GPS, Galileo to
come) - (Near-) real time earth observation data from
satellites - Common-off-the-shelf (COTS) small handheld
computers PDAs - Standardized wireless local area networking
components (802.11) - Royalty-free non-proprietary operating system
(Linux)
6COMM
EO
NAV
HQ
disaster area
Ad hoc network
7Resulting Features
- Direct feed of relevant information to/from
personnel at the site - Permanent localization of personnel and material
- WLAN infrastructure is inexpensive
- Self configuration of local ad hoc network (no
experts needed) - Mobile devices are inexpensive (only WLAN and GPS)
8Scenarios under Investigation
- We show three tiny examples illustrating the use
of the technical infrastructure for improving
efficiency in disaster management - Earthquake/CSSR (collapsed structure search and
rescue) - Field Hospital
- Flooding/Evacuation
9Scenario I Earthquake/CSSR
- INSARAG Marking system is typically used as
language spoken between rescue teams - A system used to identify structures,
conditions, hazards and victim status in a
standardized, simple and clear fashion that can
be understood by all local, national and
international rescue personnel - Common identification system marking and
signaling - Structure assessment go/no-go, search, rescue
and special hazards of a particular structure,
victim location - Results warning, tracking and continuity/ease of
work transfer (interoperability) - All markings must be conspicuous, using a
high-contrast, durable, fluorescent color - Examples of INSARAG markings
10Scenario I Earthquake/CSSR
potential victim location
Source Structural Triage and the INSARAG Marking
System
11Scenario I Earthquake/CSSR
L - 3
potential victim location, 3 live victims,
confirmed
Source Structural Triage and the INSARAG Marking
System
12CHEM GASES REQUIRES SHORING
G
AUSTRIAN TEAM 20/11 0730 Hr
2
12?
Source Structural Triage and the INSARAG Marking
System
13CHEM GASES REQUIRES SHORING RATS
G
AUSTRIAN TEAM 20/11 0730 Hr 21/11 1730 Hr
2
7
12? 2 DEAD IN ELEVATOR
Source Structural Triage and the INSARAG Marking
System
14Scenario I Earthquake/CSSR
- The INSARAG marking system is established,
conveys all important information and is easy to
understand - BUT, no direct information feed or status update
between teams and headquarters. updates have to
be relayed by (voice) radio - The INSARAG marking system is ideally suited for
entering, updating and displaying information on
a small portable device (small display/touch
display)
15Scenario I Earthquake/CSSR
- Precise localization of the devices allows to
show/reference the information at the right
location - This way, important information can flow faster
between HQs and local teams. - Hazards known from non-local sources can be
displayed - Victim counts can be relayed to inform hospitals
- Teams can be better coordinated by better
informed HQs - Note The electronic marking is not supposed to
replace the conventional spray-can marking, but
done in parallel and using the same language!
16Scenario II - German Red Cross Field Hospital
University Freiburg Institute of Computer Science
and Social Studies Department of Telematics
IIG
- Transportable hospitals
- Modularly packed camps
- Built up in areas of war or disaster
- Installed within 1-2 days
- Fully extended, size of 2 football fields
- Up to 200 inpatients and 1000 outpatients
- At present, deployed without any IT as
- "not maintenancefree"
- "not ready for use"
17Scenario II - German Red Cross Field Hospital
University Freiburg Institute of Computer Science
and Social Studies Department of Telematics
IIG
- Aim
- Develop a maintenancefree network and middleware
platform - Provide fail-safe technology where even more
then 1,000 devices are interconnected - Allow adoption of certain applications from
"home" hospitals,e.g. for planning and
organizing resources - Approach
- MANET provides a maintenancefree and robust
network solution - New self-organizing, self-configuring and
self-healing service discovery provides
applications with up-to-date view on resources - Clustering allows scaling for large and dynamic
networks
18Scenario III Flooding/Evacuation
- Concept
- Deploy robust Internet-born technology to warn
individual mobile users via already disseminated
devices (i.e. mobile phones) in terms of
emergency channels (cf. RSS newsfeeds, ICQ
etc.) - Propagate information such as nearest shelter
with free capacity through local and/or regional
communication systems including multi-hop
communication enabled by ad-hoc short-range
networking - Approach
- Standardize emergency-messaging as base
communication protocol for smart mobile devices - Develop advanced emergency-messaging, e.g.
extending GNSS by a more flexible SAR service
being capable to distribute / feedback sensor
information such as water level or wind direction
19Further down the road Smart Dust
smart dust devices (Motes) tiny wireless
microelectromechanical sensors (MEMS) that can
detect everything from light to
vibrations contain sensors, computing circuits,
bidirectional wireless communications technology
and a power supply gather scads of data, run
computations and communicate that information
using two-way band radio between motes at
distances approaching 1,000 feet
July99
11.7 mm3
2004 6.6 mm3
2003
Source Berkeley Sensor Actuator Center (BSAC)
20Making use of Smart Dust technology
DLR MicroAirLab
21Conclusions and Open Questions
- Technical issues are challenging but should be
feasible - The benefit/cost ratio appears favorable
- Only tests under real world conditions can show
existing problems and/or prove the the concepts - A publicly funded project (EU,?) seems to be a
suitable vehicle to transform the concepts to
reality - Several questions remain
- What about radio licenses? WLAN is operating in
internationally license-free ISM band (2.4 GHz),
However, local authorities might object... - Usability issues, e.g. languages, training,
- many others, unknown so far.
22Request for Feedback and Participation
- We are seeking
- Feedback, especially by people/organizations
experienced in organizational and operational
aspects of disaster management, humanitarian aid,
etc. - Partners, interested in actively participating in
RD activities to define, develop and test
rapidly deployable infrastructures with - Suitable technical background
- Suitable organizational and operational
background in disaster management, humanitarian
aid, etc.
23Contact
- Please contact
- Thank you very much!
Michael.Angermann_at_DLR.DE