Intro to Evaluative Arguments

1
Intro to Evaluative Arguments

• Stasis Theory Part II

2
X Y

• Synonymous with the terms genus species
• X is the individual case Y is the larger group
  to which X does (or does not) belong.
• This is applicable to both definitional and
  evaluative arguments

3
X Y Continued

• The Oxford English Dictionary is the most
  authoritative dictionary in the English language
• X The OED Y authoritative English language
  dictionaries
• This pinot noir is an excellent wine
• X this pinot noir Y excellent wines

4
Definitional vs. Evaluative Arguments

• The X is or is not a Y format is very similar
  for both definitional and evaluative arguments
• The distinction is that definitional arguments
  merely claim that X is a Y evaluative arguments
  examine whether or not X is a good, efficient,
  effective, attractive or potent (to name a few
  possibilities) Y

5
Definitional vs. Evaluative Arguments - Criteria

• Like definitional arguments, evaluative arguments
  are focused on defining criteria for the Y
  term, and then evaluating the X according to
  those criteria.
• A 3-sentence summary of an evaluative paper
• - A good Y meets criteria A, B C
• - X meets the criteria A, B C
• - Therefore X is a good Y
• Unlike definitional arguments, evaluative
  arguments are often most controversial in their
  choice of criteria. Expect to defend your
  selections.

6
Standards for Criteria

• Criteria are often established according to what
  is normal OR according to what is ideal.
• Some situations lend themselves to different
  kinds of criteria be self-aware about your
  selection. In formulating a mission statement,
  you want to be ideal. In suggesting drug
  treatment methods, it may be imperative to
  consider what is normal.

7
Mitigating Circumstances Cost

• Be aware that, if you argue for mitigating
  circumstances in your criteria, you will have a
  harder sell. (I shot John Lennon because I
  hated my father)
• Keep in mind the issue of cost (in time, money,
  spirit, c.) the most superlative X is useless
  if it is too expensive, hard-to-use,
  time-consuming, c.

8
Building Your Evaluative Argument 1) Choose
your Y

• Determine the most suitable Y category for your
  X.
• Choose the smallest possible Y (within reason).
• Amazon.com is the best website is less
  informative that Amazon.com is the best on-line
  bookstore.

9
Building Your Evaluative Argument 2) Choosing
criteria

• Select your criteria by considering the function
  of your Y term.
• What is it supposed to do? Granny Smiths are
  the best baking apples Baking apples should
  stay firm when cooked and not become cloyingly
  sweet
• Arabella is the best candidate for this
  engineering internship - A good engineering
  intern should be skilled with computers and
  capable of following highly detailed directions.

10
Building Your Evaluative Argument 3 4

• 3 Use the Y terms purpose to generate criteria
• 4 Sort the criteria by importance
• You may want to assemble your criteria in you
  paper in order of increasing strength of argument
  importance.

11
Building Your Evaluative Argument Outline

• Introduce your issues why evaluating X is
  problematic or controversial
• Explain your choice of criteria
• Refute opposition to your criteria
• Present your own claim
• Criterion 1
• Criterion 2
• Criterion 3 c
• Sum up your evaluation (conclusion)

12
Testing Your Evaluative Argument

• Will my audience accept my criteria?
• Are my criteria based on the smallest applicable
  class for X?
• Will readers accept my weighting of the criteria?
• Do I need to defend my use of normal/ideal
  criteria?

13
The End

• Go to class website