Research Proven Strategies in Language ArtsLiteracy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Research Proven Strategies in Language ArtsLiteracy

Description:

Definitive research base still building. Controversies continue (e.g., Fletcher & Lyon, 1998) ... Still need basics; higher level decoding (Moats, 1998) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: lhed7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Research Proven Strategies in Language ArtsLiteracy


1
Research Proven Strategies in Language
Arts/Literacy
  • Katie Drummond
  • CCSSO, October 20, 2003

2
Reading Prominent Issues
  • Definitive research base still building
  • Controversies continue (e.g., Fletcher Lyon,
    1998)
  • Concern over identification
  • reading deficit vs. reading disability
  • (e.g., Snow, Burns, Griffin, 1998)
  • Literacy acquisition is problematic for many

3
The Evidence Base
  • 5 strands from Reading Panel (NRP, 2000)
  • Phonemic Awareness
  • Phonics
  • Fluency
  • Vocabulary
  • Comprehension
  • Literacy for adolescents
  • Writing


4
Phonemic Awareness Phonics
  • Best when explicit, systematic
  • Not a complete program
  • System is complicated teachers skills need to
    be developed (Moats, 2001)
  • Need to ensure that materials are carefully
    constructed (Stein, Johnson Gutlohn, 1999)

5
Fluency
  • Accurate and quick reading of text
  • Repeated, monitored, modeled oral reading is
    best mode of achieving
  • (Chard, Vaughn, Tyler, 2002)
  • Passages need to be at independent-reading level

6
Vocabulary
  • Extended instruction
  • Repeated exposure
  • Word substitution
  • Multiple methods work best

7
Comprehension
  • Use of graphic organizers
  • Question answering/generation
  • Structure--fiction and expository (Gersten,
    Fuchs, Williams, Baker, 2001)
  • Summarization
  • Mixed methods work best

8
Reading and Verbal Competency
  • As skill in decoding grows, general linguistic
    competency accounts for more of reading outcomes
    (Shankweiler et al., 1999)
  • Metalinguistic awareness
  • Background knowledge (Shankweiler et al., 1999)
  • Engagement with complex ideas
  • (Beck, McKeown, Hamilton, Kucan, 1998)

9
Older Readers
  • Need to transact with text (Peterson, Caverly,
    Nicholson, ONeal, Cusenbary, 2000)
  • Evidence of late-emerging reading disability
    (Leach, Scarborough, Rescorla, 2003)
  • Still need basics higher level decoding (Moats,
    1998)
  • Need ways to engage with complex ideas even if
    they cannot read it yet

10
Writing
  • Process and self-regulation are key
  • Mechanisms for consistency
  • Tools for planning (Harris Graham, 1992)
  • Attention or compensation for handwriting and
    spelling issues (Mastropieri Scruggs, 2004)

11
Overall
  • More conclusive findings on general strategies
    than programs/curricula
  • Expertise of teachers
  • Rigor of instruction time (Chard Kameenui,
    2000 Vaughn, Levy, Coleman, 2002)
  • Metacognitive strategies, integration important
    for special needs (Vaughn, Gersten, Chard,
    2000)
  • More research

12
  • This content was developed by staff at The Access
    Center Improving Outcomes for All Students K-8,
    funded by U. S. Department of Education, Office
    of Special Education Programs and housed at the
    American Institutes for Research. Retrieved
    today's date, from the World Wide Web
    http//www.k8accesscenter.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com