Title: Sarah McCarthy
1Trophic performance of Oncorhynchus mykiss along
forest gradients in the South Fork Trinity River
watershed
2South Fork Trinity River
Photo courtesy of J. Duda
3- Klamath River tributary
- Trinity River dam 1962
- South Fork Trinity undammed
- Klamath Mountains Province steelhead ESU unlisted
4Objectives
- What factors control O. mykiss production in CA?
- Temperature Effects
- Prey Quality
- Feeding Rate
- Use bioenergetics modeling to identify effect of
season, age, forest cover, and temperature on O.
mykiss consumption and growth efficiency (GE).
5Study Design
- 9 streams
- 3 forest cover categories
- 2 temperature regimes
6Study Design
7Bioenergetics Model
FISH GROWTH
C G M W
DIET COMPOSITION
PREDATOR ENERGY DENSITY
THERMAL EXPERIENCE
PREY ENERGY DENSITY
Proportion of maximum consumption (p) C/Cmax
G/C Growth efficiency (GE)
CONSUMPTION
8Model Inputs
- Stream Temperature
- (constant temperature monitoring)
- Prey Quality
- (invertebrate drift sampling)
- O. mykiss Growth Measurements
- O. mykiss Diet Composition
9Fish Sampling
- Electrofished 9 streams during June, August, and
October 2003
10Fish Sampling
- Electrofished 9 streams during June, August, and
October 2003 - Measured length weight
11Fish Sampling
- Electrofished 9 streams during June, August, and
October 2003 - Measured length weight
- Collected scales
12Fish Sampling
- Electrofished 9 streams during June, August, and
October 2003 - Measured length weight
- Collected scales
- Collected stomach contents
13Fish Sampling
Conifer-cool highest weight, but all groups had
slow growth
Warm streams had sharpest growth increase
Hardwood-cool and conifer-cool grew most
14Diet Composition
- Prey items
- Immature aquatic sources
- Aquatic larvae (Diptera, Coleoptera, Trichoptera,
etc) - Aquatic nymphs (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, etc)
- Aquatic other (Gastropoda, Isopoda, Crustacea,
Acarina, Ostracoda, etc) - Adult invertebrates
- Aquatic (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera,
Diptera) - Terrestrial (Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, Araneae)
15Diet Composition
- Contribution of adult insects increased with age
16Diets varied by season and age
17Bioenergetics Modeling
- Low proportion of maximum consumption (avg0.25)
1.0
Cmax
0.8
Consumption
0.6
Specific rate (g/g/d)
0.4
0.2
Respiration
0.0
5
10
15
20
25
Temperature (C)
C G M W
18Simulating Increased Summer Temperature Effects
Age 0
Age 0
Age 1
Age 1
Age 2
Age 2
Most growth occurs during winter/spring
19Simulating Increased Summer Temperature Effects
11.5
18.8
5.4
8.9
With 2oC temperature increase, O. mykiss required
to grow more over winter.
20Summary
- Increased consumption of adult insects with age
and season - Higher consumption of adult invertebrates in
conifer-cool category - Decreased or negative growth during late summer
- Low feeding rates throughout summer
- Decreased summer growth after 2oC temperature
increase
Photo courtesy of J. Duda
21Summary
- Increased consumption of adult insects with age
and season - Higher consumption of adult invertebrates in
conifer-cool category - Decreased or negative growth during late summer
- Low feeding rates throughout summer
- Decreased summer growth after 2oC temperature
increase
Photo courtesy of J. Duda
22Summary
- Increased consumption of adult insects with age
and season - Higher consumption of adult invertebrates in
conifer-cool category - Decreased or negative growth during late summer
- Low feeding rates throughout summer
- Decreased summer growth after 2oC temperature
increase
Photo courtesy of J. Duda
23Summary
- Increased consumption of adult insects with age
and season - Higher consumption of adult invertebrates in
conifer-cool category - Decreased or negative growth during late summer
- Low feeding rates throughout summer
- Decreased summer growth after 2oC temperature
increase
Photo courtesy of J. Duda
24Summary
- Increased consumption of adult insects with age
and season - Higher consumption of adult invertebrates in
conifer-cool category - Decreased or negative growth during late summer
- Low feeding rates throughout summer
- Decreased summer growth after 2oC temperature
increase
Photo courtesy of J. Duda
25Conclusions
- Isnt summer the growing season?
- O. mykiss may be food-limited across the
watershed - Heightens concern for effects of interannual
variability and/or climate shifts - Implications for other steelhead stocks in CA
- high temperatures exacerbated by low prey supply
- even minor shifts in temperature or food supply
could push population further into negative
growth patterns - Recommend extending study to neighboring
populations
26Acknowledgements
Graduate committee Dr. David Beauchamp, Dr.
John Emlen, Dr. Thomas Quinn
USGS Jeffrey Duda, C. Ostberg, Dr. R.
Reisenbichler, Dr. S. Rubin, K. Larsen, S.
Dufrene, L. Pascoe, C. Chambers, C. Galitsky, J.
Steinbacher UW School of Aquatic and Fishery
Sciences Dr. C. Grue, Dr. L. Conquest, V.
Blackhurst, E. Chia, D. ODonnell, A. Van Mason,
A. Lind, C. Sergeant, S. Damm, J. Matilla, E.
Duffy, A. Cross, J. Moss, M. Mazur, N. Overman,
S. Wang, E. Schoen USFS Redwood Sciences
Laboratory, Arcata, CA Dr. H. Welsh, G.
Hodgson, Dr. B. Harvey USFS Ranger Station,
Hayfork, CA J. Lang, J. Fitzgerald
27(No Transcript)
28Effects of Food and Temperature on Growth
Energetics
Consumption rate reduction reduced optimal
temperature for growth and growth potential.
29Effects of Food and Temperature on Growth
Energetics
25 Cmax
Absolute growth very low when costs associated
with metabolism and waste are accounted for.
30Physical Stream Characteristics
- Stream Temperature
- Temperature loggers deployed April-October 2003
- Temperature recorded every 20 minutes
- Avg daily temp gt17C warm
- Avg daily temp lt17C cool
31Prey Sampling
- Drift Composition
- Drift samplers deployed before dusk collected
after dawn - Evaluated relative proportion of invertebrate
drift - Invertebrates used for bomb calorimetry
32Relative Prey Supply
- Drift Composition
- Higher volume of immature aquatic invertebrates
- Higher prey supply in hardwood-cool
33Cumulative Consumption
2.9 - 8.9
-2.3 9.7
-7.3 7.2
GE Growth/Consumption
Lower growth efficiencies during late summer
34Cumulative Consumption
-1.1 11
-42 15.2
-3.8 15.4
GE Growth/Consumption
Lower growth efficiencies during late summer
35Cumulative Consumption
3.7 7.1
-2.7 13.2
-12.2 15.9
GE Growth/Consumption
Lower growth efficiencies during late summer