MERCURY IN GROUND WATER, SOILS, AND SEPTAGE, NEW JERSEY COASTAL PLAIN - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

MERCURY IN GROUND WATER, SOILS, AND SEPTAGE, NEW JERSEY COASTAL PLAIN

Description:

MERCURY IN GROUND WATER, SOILS, AND SEPTAGE, NEW JERSEY COASTAL PLAIN. Julia L. Barringer and Zoltan Szabo. U.S. Geological Survey, West Trenton, NJ ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: jbar79
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MERCURY IN GROUND WATER, SOILS, AND SEPTAGE, NEW JERSEY COASTAL PLAIN


1
MERCURY IN GROUND WATER, SOILS, AND SEPTAGE, NEW
JERSEY COASTAL PLAIN
  • Julia L. Barringer and Zoltan Szabo
  • U.S. Geological Survey, West Trenton, NJ
  • In cooperation with the New Jersey Department of
    Environmental Protection (NJDEP)

2
Our objectives information about--
  • Occurrence of mercury (Hg) contamination in
    groundwater in southern New Jerseyan ongoing
    problem (rarely studied elsewhere)
  • Likely and unlikely Hg sources
  • Processes that are believed to lead to the
    contamination
  • The environments that seem conducive to causing
    the contamination.

3
OCCURRENCE
4
The Problem
  • Total Hg exceeds the MCL (2 mg/L) in water from a
    major NJ aquifer system.
  • More than 600 domestic wells in more than 70
    residential areas in 8 counties affected
  • Hg concentrations as high as 72 mg/L
  • Concentrations of sodium, chloride and nitrate
    elevated in domestic-well water
  • VOCs may be detected.
  • Hg found in ground water in Delaware, too.

5
The aquifer and affected residential areas are
shown below. Aquifer characteristics are
  • Quartz-rich sand and gravel scattered clay
    lenses
  • Acidic ground water (pH 4.5 6.0)
  • Background Hg concentrations lt0.01 mg/L in water
  • Vulnerability to contamination from the land
    surface.

6
SOURCES
7
None of the potential point sources (below) of Hg
investigated by USGS and NJDEP could be
conclusively linked to the Hg-contaminated ground
water in the residential areas.
  • Landfills
  • Industrial sites
  • Commercial operations
  • Dentists offices
  • Military Installations
  • Cemeteries
  • Hospital septic systems
  • Laboratories

8
Likely Hg sources to land surface
  • Atmospheric deposition
  • Mercurial pesticides used on crops and turf (most
    residential areas were built on former
    agricultural land)
  • Fertilizers containing Hg.

9
Hg in soils and aquifer materials
  • More Hg in undisturbed soils (up to 150 mg/kg)
    than in (1) disturbed residential soils (lt50
    mg/kg) and (2) most aquifer materials (lt50
    mg/kg)
  • Hg higher in aquifer clay lenses (50-110 mg/kg)
  • Hg in ground water above and below clay lenses at
    background levels.

10
Hg in topsoils was associated with organic
materials, but, in subsoils, with iron and
aluminum hydroxides.
11
We studied Hg in several residential septic
systems to discover whether they were sources of
Hg to ground water, or part of the process of Hg
mobilization, or both.
12
At an unsewered residential area, evidence of
septic-system effects on domestic-well water were
  • Presence of detergents
  • High concentrations of ammonia, boron, chloride,
    nitrate, and sodium
  • Undetectable sulfate and detected sulfide, which
    indicate likely presence of sulfate-reducing
    bacteria that methylate Hg.

13
Chemical characteristics of septage and
leach-field effluent were--
  • Hg concentrations in septage ranging from lt 0.02
    to 0.06 mg/L
  • No dilution of Hg concentrations from septage to
    effluent, but dilution of other constituents
  • Concentrations of chloride (Cl) and sodium (Na)
    in domestic-well water overlapping those in
    leach-field effluent.

14
----Effluent------
------------Domestic wells----------------
15
PROCESSES
16
Potential processes for mobilizing mercury are--
  • Soil disturbance moves Hg from topsoil to
    subsoil
  • Hg adsorbs to iron hydroxides in subsoils
  • Effluent removes Hg from subsoils as it moves
    downgradient from the septic tank,
  • Effluent reduces the subsoils iron hydroxides,
  • Iron and adsorbed Hg go into solution in the
    effluent.

17
In leach-field effluent, Hg concentrations
increased with Fe concentrations.
18
Hg concentrations decreased with dissolved
organic carbon (DOC) concentrations apparently,
DOC is not transporting Hg.
19
Concentrations of Hg in effluent increased as pH
decreased. In ground water, the same relation
occurs.
20
The USGS and NJDEP also collected both unfiltered
and filtered ground-water samples for Hg analysis
  • In some cases, the filtered sample contained less
    Hg than the corresponding unfiltered sample.
  • A likely explanation for this observation is that
    some of the Hg is bound to particles that are
    removed by filtering.

21
Differences in Hg in filtered and unfiltered
sample pairs from 16 domestic and production
wells
22
Co-occurrence of Hg gt0.1 mg/L and VOCs was
examined for 6 Atlantic County Hg sites. o,
Non-significant at p0.10 Significant at or
above p0.1 , Significant at or above p0.05
Significant at or above p0.01 --,
Insufficient VOC data to test
23
IMPORTANT ENVIRONMENTS
24
Some important components of the environment
where Hg is mobilized may be
  • Disturbed soils
  • Leach-field effluent
  • Localized anoxic zones where iron reduction
    (also sulfate reduction and Hg methylation?) can
    occur
  • Particles to transport Hg.

25
Were still trying to find out
  • Whether VOCs affect Hg mobility
  • Whether methyl Hg in ground water poses a
    problem
  • How Hg accumulates to high levels in the aquifer
  • Will the problem occur elsewhere in similar
    land-use, geologic, and biogeochemical settings?
  • Contact jbarring_at_usgs.gov
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com