Earths Dynamic Magnetic Field: The State of the Art Comprehensive Model - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

Earths Dynamic Magnetic Field: The State of the Art Comprehensive Model

Description:

Earths Dynamic Magnetic Field: The State of the Art Comprehensive Model – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: genghi
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Earths Dynamic Magnetic Field: The State of the Art Comprehensive Model


1
Earths Dynamic Magnetic Field The State of the
Art Comprehensive Model
Terence J. Sabaka
Geodynamics Branch NASA/GSFC
with special thanks to
Nils Olsen
Danish Space Research Institute
2
Outline
  • Introduction
  • Data
  • Parameterization
  • Estimation
  • Results
  • Conclusions

3
Electromagnetic Basics The Biot-Savart Law
4
Major near-Earth Current Systems
5
Nature of near-Earth Magnetic Fields
  • Core
  • Motion of conductive outer core fluid
  • 30,000-50,000 nT
  • Changes on order of centuries
  • Ionosphere
  • Dynamo layer between 100-140 km altitude in
    the E-region
  • 10-50 nT at surface
  • EEJ is from enhanced eastward current at dip
    equator

6
Nature of near-Earth Magnetic Fields
  • Magnetosphere
  • Magnetopause, tail and ring currents
  • 20-30 nT at surface
  • Broad scale, but rapidly changing
  • FACs
  • Connect ionosphere with magnetosphere at high
    latitudes in the F-region
  • 30-100 nT during quiet times

7
Nature of near-Earth Magnetic Fields
  • Lithosphere
  • Rigid portion of crust above Curie temperature
  • Induced and remanent
  • Up to 20 nT at satellite altitude
  • Induced fields
  • Time varying external fields influencing
    conductive material in Earth skin layer
  • Magnitude depends upon inducing period

8
Time Scales of Magnetic Fields from Various
Sources
9
Terrestrial Magnetic Field Applications
  • Orientation/Reckoning
  • Used by satellites including GPS
  • Navigation systems
  • Geophysical prospecting
  • Aeromagnetic surveys
  • Towed by ships
  • Military targets
  • Deep Earth probing
  • Space weather

10
Comprehensive Approach to Modelling Terrestrial
Fields
  • Method
  • Parameterize fields from all major near- Earth
    sources
  • Coestimate these parameters by solving an
    inverse problem
  • Use satellite vector/scalar and ground- based
    observatory hourly-means data
  • Advantages
  • Optimal for frequency overlap
  • More feasible than treating fields as noise

11
Data Used for Modelling
  • Satellites
  • POGO 1965-1971, scalar only, elliptic
  • Magsat 1980, vector, six months duration, only
    dawn and dusk, 450 km
  • Oersted 1999-present, vector, 750 km
  • CHAMP 2001-present, vector, 400 km
  • Observatories
  • Several hundred, continuous, but poorly
    distributed
  • Vector hourly-mean values

12
Recent Satellite Magnetic Mapping Missions
Oersted vector and scalar at 750 km
CHAMP vector and scalar at 400 km
13
Permanent Magnetic Observatory Stations
14
Maxwells Equations
Amperes Law
Absence of magnetic monopoles
Faradays Law
Gauss Law
15
Potential Fields (zero J)
(Laplace Eqn)
(Internal)
(External)
16
Absence of Monopoles
Internal n 0 term violates Maxwells
monopole equation at origin
O External n 0 term is constant, doesnt
contribute
17
Spherical Harmonic Functions (Ynm )
n6, m0 n6, m3 n6, m6

18
Toroidal Fields (non-zero J in
thin shells)
Vector potential
Toroidal only
Toroidal scalar

19
Parameterizing Core and Lithospheric Fields
  • Core
  • Broad scale, dominates n 1-14
  • Secular variation (SV) represented by cubic
    B-spline functions
  • Lithosphere
  • All spatial scales, but breaks from core Rn at
    about n 15
  • Modelled as n 15-65
  • Considered static
  • Vector biases solved for at observatories

20
Rn Spectrum of Internal Field

21
Fluid Velocity at Core-Mantle Boundary

22

External Field Current Systems
ionospheric current systems
magnetospheric ring-current
23
Ionospheric Daytime Electron Density
24
Parameterizing Ionospheric E-region Field
  • Primary
  • Assume currents flow in sheet at 110 km
  • Use potential functions conforming to
    quasi-dipole (QD) coordinates defined by
    DGRF1980
  • Diurnal and seasonal variation
  • Solar activity via scaling by F10.7 cm flux
  • Induced
  • A priori 1-D conductivity model (4-layer)
  • Infinite conductor at 1000 km depth

25
Continuity Across E-region Sheet Current
26
E-region Breathes with F10.7 cm Solar Flux
27
Quasi-Dipole Chart at Surface from DGRF1980
28
Parameterizing Magnetospheric Field
  • Primary
  • Distant currents not differentiated
  • Potential functions in dipole coordinates
  • Diurnal and seasonal variation
  • Ring current activity via linear dependence of
    external dipole on Dst index
  • Induced
  • Same as for E-region
  • Internal dipole also linear in Dst

29
Dst Behavior Around Storm Main Phase on 18 Aug
1998
30
Parameterizing Ionospheric F-region Field
  • Magsat (vector only)
  • Modelled separately for dawn and dusk
  • Assume QD meridional currents
  • Use toroidal functions conforming to QD
    coordinates
  • Seasonal variation
  • Oersted (vector only)
  • Same as above, but single model with diurnal
    variation

31
Ionospheric F-region Currents
  • Field-aligned currents (FACs) connect
    ionosphere and magnetosphere in polar region
  • Meridional currents associated with the
    equatorial electrojet (EEJ)

32
Ionospheric F-region Currents
33
The Principle of Least-Squares Estimation
34
Estimation of CM Parameters via Iterative Gauss
Method
  • Solves non-linear LS problems
  • Fast convergence
  • Cheaper than Newton method
  • Allows for A priori information
  • Smooth core SV
  • Eliminate nightside E-region current
  • Damp excursions from LT external dipole
  • Smooth F-region current

35
CM Fits to Observatory Hourly-Means
36
CM Fits to Satellite Data
37
CM Core Br at CMB at 2000

38
CM Core F at Surface at 1980

39
CM Core DF at Surface from 1980 to 2000

40
CM Lithospheric Br at 400 km

41
CM Ionospheric Z at Surface
42
CM Magnetospheric Z at Surface on 22 Aug 1998
43
CM F-region Jr from Magsat at Dawn and Dusk
44
CM F-region J from Oersted at Noon
45
Conclusions
  • Present
  • CMs are only models accounting for all these
    field sources
  • CMs are separating fields in a consistent and
    plausible manner
  • Future
  • More realistic conductivity models
  • Better treatment of magnetospheric fields
  • Increased use of CMs for applications
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com