Is it true what they say about learning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Is it true what they say about learning

Description:

St. Bonaventure put multimedia carts in local schools for student teacher use. Collaboration with Arts&Sciences. Less activity/Great promise ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:17
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: harryf8
Category:
Tags: learning | true

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Is it true what they say about learning


1
Is it true what they say about learning?
  • SREB Educational Technology
  • Cooperative
  • Jan. 17, 2002

2
The drive to learn is as strong as the sexual
driveit begins earlier and lasts longer.
Edward T. Hall, anthropologist
3
Implications
  • Learning should be what you need when you need it
  • Learning should be personal
  • Learning should be social

4
Information is Not Knowledge
  • Information is a wonderful thing, but it is not
    knowledge. You wouldnt be educated if you
    managed to memorize the entire encyclopedia.
  • You would just be weird.
  • Historian David McCullough
  • (from NSBE report)

5
Technology Push Over the Years
  • Overhead projector in every classroom (bowling
    alley??)
  • Technology in special areas (language labs,
    science labs)
  • Computer labs
  • Technology for every professor
  • Teaching with technology

6
What to Teach/What to Learn?
  • Computer literacybits and bites
  • BASIClearn by programming
  • LOGOcreative thinking and turtles
  • CAIsoftware that moves with the child
  • Special tools for contentscience, math
  • Surfing the Web
  • Creating Web sites

7
The Killer Ap
  • Teachers who
  • know what the technology offers to help children
    learn better,
  • understand how to use that technology as
    comfortably as they use other tools in their
    teaching toolbox, and
  • help students identify and develop the unique
    skills associated with new media and technologies

8
Learning about technology is Not instinctual
  • 2/3 of K12 teachers feel not at all or somewhat
    prepared
  • Only 23 of teachers feel well prepared and only
    10 very well prepared to teach with technology
    (NCES, 2000)
  • Average training less than 8 hours

9
We Wont Get What We Dont Pay For!
  • 30 of tech budgets for professional development
    as goal
  • 17 is the realityon average

10
New Models for P12
  • Project MEET in MA (www.doe.mass.edu/edtech/teache
    r/projectmeet)
  • Maryland Technology Academy (http//cte.jhu.edu/te
    chacademy/)
  • Louisiana INTECH (www.lcet.doe.state.la.us/laintec
    h/
  • Online PD
  • e.g. SREB Algebra
  • Concord Consortium (www.concord.org)
  • (e.g. Hands On Physics)

11
Technology Training Model for Effective
Professional Development
  • National Staff Development Council's Standards
    for Staff Development
  • (www.nsdc.org)
  • No More Drive By Staff Development!

12
CONTEXT
  • Learning communities
  • Leadership
  • Resources

13
PROCESS
  • Data-driven
  • Evaluation to test value
  • Research-based
  • Multiple learning strategies
  • Learning theory in practice
  • Collaboration

14
Keys to Success
  • Mentoring
  • Mentoring
  • Mentoring
  • Time
  • Support
  • Sharing
  • Reflecting
  • Visioning
  • Re-visioning
  • More Time

15
The Faculty Challenge Crossing the Chasm
Late Majority
Early Majority
Innovators/Early Adopters
16
The Chasm Challenge
  • Different perceptions of
  • risk reward!
  • Innovators technology enthusiasts looking for
    the next new thing!
  • Early Adopters risk takers looking for great
    gains or improvements from adopting innovation!
  • Early Majority low risk preference the
    pragmatists want proof the innovation works
    and provides some improvement!
  • Late Majority risk averse the conservatives
    only adopt when most colleagues have adopted the
    innovation!

  • (Moore Crossing the Chasm)

17
(No Transcript)
18
Can Faculty Change? Yes, But
  • Very consistent patterns
  • Best Guess, Just-in-Case workshops have
    limited results
  • Targeted, Just-in-Time, Just-as-Needed,
    one-on-one faculty support shows most promise
  • release time and personal time with consultants
    (e.g. SW Missouri State)
  • Student tech mentors (lots of examples)
  • Teaming with other faculty (e.g. (K12/COE/ AS
    Triads , Columbus State, GA)

19
Collaboration with P-12
  • Teams for methods redesign
  • ( U NE Lincoln)
  • Training K12 supervising faculty along with
    higher ed and student teachers
  • (TX Womens U)
  • Build local P12 capacity
  • U MO Columbia only 5 were tech-savvy--developed
    database training of local teachers
  • St. Bonaventure put multimedia carts in local
    schools for student teacher use

20
Collaboration with ArtsSciences
  • Less activity/Great promise
  • AS seek out SCDE as leader in tech
    implementation
  • (e.g. Business, Engineering,Wichita State)
  •  Collaborations (COE/AS/K12) for
    technology/course development
  • (e.g. Kent State)
  • Iowa State Toying with Technology

21
L
L
L
L
L
NETWORKED LEARNING COMMUNITY
22
CLASSROOMS BECOME NETWORKED LEARNING HUBS
Teachers and Students Become Collaborative
Learners
From Producer Driven Education To Consumer Driven
Learning
Personal Learning Portals
23
Any Where, Any Time, Any Place, Any Pace
24
Schools That Learn
  • Mental modelswhat do we believe about how
    children learn? Content? Delivery?
  • Personal mastery
  • Team learning and reflection
  • Shared vision and responsibility
  • Mentor, collaborate, model 21st C skills

25
Systems thinking
26
We Are Educators, We Touch the Future
27
  • Kathleen Fulton
  • National Commission on Teaching and Americas
    Future
  • www.nctaf.org
  • Kathleen_fulton_at_lycos.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com