IPsec%20Benchmarking%20Terminology/Methodology%20IETF69%20-%20Chicago,%20USA

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IPsec%20Benchmarking%20Terminology/Methodology%20IETF69%20-%20Chicago,%20USA


1
IPsec Benchmarking Terminology/MethodologyIETF69
- Chicago, USA
  • Merike Kaeo
  • merike_at_doubleshotsecurit
    y.com

2
Latest Documents
  • Terminology for Benchmarking IPsec Devices
  • draft-ietf-bmwg-ipsec-term-09.txt
  • Methodology for Benchmarking IPsec Devices
  • draft-ietf-bmwg-ipsec-meth-02.txt

3
Terminology Document Changes
  • Updated all references to latest IPsec RFCs
  • Adding limited and scoped DoS Testing
  • IKE Phase 1 PSK or certificate mismatch
  • IKE Phase 2 hash mismatch (for AH or ESP/Null)
  • Replay attack
  • Still need to clean up section 8 Framesizes
  • Need to clean up examples for IPv4/IPv6 cleartext
    and IPv4/IPv6 IPsec protected framesizes
  • New consideration regarding section 10.5
    Back-to-Back Frames
  • Is this test still relevant?
  • Should the length of the burst be different than
    that which is defined in RFC1242?

4
Methodology Document Changes
  • Updated all references to latest IPsec RFCs
  • Modified transform sets to conform to latest
    algorithms
  • Updated security context parameters
  • Back-to-Back Frame Baseline
  • The back-to-back value is the number of frames in
    the longest burst that the DUT will handle
    without the loss of any frames. The trial length
    MUST be at least 2 seconds and SHOULD be repeated
    at least 50 times with the average of the
    recorded values being reported.
  • Is above text appropriate or should length of
    trial be increased?
  • Need to still add DoS Resiliency Methodology

5
Final Steps.
  • Input on missing items would be useful
  • Will ask for last call on next revisions of both
    documents
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com