Title: Job profile and training requirements of
1Job profile and training requirements of
European flight dispatchers
2Agenda
1 General 2 Survey results 3 IOSA Auditing 4
Consequences
3What?
- Dissertation as part of a Masters Degree
Programme inAir Transport Management - London City University
- Title Job profile and training requirements of
European Flight Dispatchers - Impartial, not politically motivated
4Who?
- Andreas Cordes, 41 years old
- Ex Lufthansa Captain
- Experience on B747-400, B737, A319/20/21
- Licensed Flight Dispatcher (Germany)
- IOSA Lead Auditor and Trainer
5Goals
- Evaluate the environment of FOO/FDs in Europe
anddefine a job profile - Analyze Operator specific differences
- What kind of training is required in order to get
the job done? - Assess the market chances for such a training
course
6A word about licenses
- It is not the purpose of the study to answer the
question, whether FOO/FDs should be licensed - The issue is highly political and worth a study
of its own - ? But
- the study will deliver arguments for the
discussion
7Confidentialty
- The study has not been completed yet
- Content as presented here is tentative and shall
not be copied and distributed - EUFALDA will receive the full paper as soon as
it has been released by the University
8Agenda
1 General 2 Survey results 3 IOSA Auditing 4
Consequences
9Participants
- Questionnaire has been sent to 140 Operators
- All sizes, all business models, all 32 JAA
member states - Feedback received from 42 Operators
- 24 countries covered
- Unfortunately very little feedback from
- ? UK ? Low-Cost Carriers
10Staff numbers
- Survey covers the work of 972 Flight Dispatchers
- Being responsible for 1807 aircraft
- Staff ratio 0,54 FOO/FD per aircraft
- Ratio varies, depending on the type of operation
-
11Licensing 1
- The majority is unlicensed
-
12Licensing 2
- Small Operators rely more on unlicensed staff
- FAA License is popular for small operators
- Turbo-prop and regional operators have the least
licensed dispatchers -
13Hiring 1
- 1/3 of all Operators require staff to be licensed
- These Operators prefer a license issued by their
authority- followed by FAA license- and only
then accept other EU countrys licenses - EU licenses are isolated
-
14Hiring 2
- Most Operators require previous airline
experience -
15Hiring 3
- Most Operators have hiring difficulties
-
16Hiring 4
- Average on-the-job training for new-entrants is 3
months - Unlicensed staff does not receive more on-the-job
training? No compensation of training
deficiencies -
17Interfaces/Work environment/Tools
- Highlights
- Primary interfaces for FOO/FDs are
- Cockpit Crew Flow Management Unit Line
maintenance staff - FOO/FDs in small Operators have more interfaces
than others - Unlicensed staff uses complex material less often
(MEL, Performance Manuals) -
18Tasks and duties
- Very detailed data are available in the study
- Only highlights are presented here
- Activities are summarized in an activity index
- For
- - Preflight assistance- Operational Control-
In-flight assistance- Other activities -
19Tasks and duties Preflight assistance
- Type of operation determines level of pre-flight
assistance - Unlicensed staff is almost equally involved
-
20Tasks and duties Operational Control
- All groups of FOO/FDs are equally active in
operational control duties - Exception executive operators
-
21Tasks and duties In-flight assistance
- Level of in-flight assistance varies by operator
type - Remarkable Many operators provide
flight-following - Small Operators provide less in-flight assistance
-
-
22Tasks and duties Other activities
- FOO/FDs that work for small operators are kept
busy with commercial activities (scheduling,
bookings.) -
23Agenda
1 General 2 Survey results 3 IOSA Auditing 4
Consequences
24IOSA Audits
- European Operators have more findings in the
Dispatch section, especially - Initial training
- and
- recurrent training
-
25IOSA Audits
- Operational problems discovered in IOSA audits
-
26IOSA Audits
- IOSA Auditing is extremely difficult in the
European environment because - ? U.S. and Europe are treated with identical
standards - ConsequenceIOSA standards have completely
changed in late 2006 - Highlight Introduction of the Flight Operations
Assistant (FOA) to help EU carriers meet the
standard - EUFALDA is strongly recommended to become
familiar with the new concept !! -
27Agenda
1 General 2 Survey results 3 IOSA Auditing 4
Consequences
28Consequences I
- European FOO/FDs perform work that meets the
definition of ICAO Annex VI in the new version of
2006 - But
- Many FOO/FD are not adequately qualified
- Training deficiencies are obvious, large spread
exists between groups of Operators - Hence
- Formal basic dispatch training is needed for all
FOO/FDs Most existing programmes do not meet
industry needs -
29Consequences II
- Operators believe that a 3 mth. training would be
adequate -
30Consequences III
- Market chances of such training is limited
- because
- ? Training is not mandatory in most countries
- ? Operators are not willing to pay
- ? FAA training is cheaper and shorter
- Possible solution
- ?Minimum training could become mandatory
irrespective of a licensing requirement - No change in regulation to be expected before
EASA has full competence -
31Thank you!
- for your attention
- and
- for your support !
-
Have a successful venue in Iceland !
In case of questions, please contact andreas.co
rdes_at_online.de